Developing and piloting a set of quality-of-care indicators for Romanian public hospitals as part of a national programme to fund quality.

Abstract

Background: Healthcare systems aim to enhance the health status and well-being of the individuals and populations they serve. To achieve this, measuring and evaluating the quality and safety of services provided and the outcomes achieved is essential. Like other countries, Romania faces challenges regarding the quality of care provided in its public hospitals. To address this, the Romanian Ministry of Health initiated reforms in 2022, including implementing a pay-for-performance model based on quality indicators. This paper presents a descriptive analysis of processes, methods, results and lessons learned from developing and piloting a set of Quality of Care indicators for Romanian public hospitals.

Methods: World Health Organization's Athens Office on Quality of Care and Patient Safety assisted Romania in developing and piloting a set of quality-of-care indicators for public hospitals. The development phase included defining indicator domains, identifying potential indicators across these domains, and defining the final indicator set. The piloting phase involved selecting and recruiting piloting hospitals, developing data collection and validation methods and tools, training hospital staff, and collecting and analysing indicator data. Piloting ended with an evaluation workshop. Mixed, quantitative and qualitative methods were used, including literature reviews, stakeholder consultation workshops, survey instruments developed for this study, modified Delphi panels and consensus-building meetings. National stakeholders were actively involved throughout the process.

Results: Four priority domains were defined for quality-of-care indicators for Romanian public hospitals: patient safety, patient experience, healthcare workforce training and safety, and clinical effectiveness. 25 core indicators were selected across these domains. During the pilot, hospitals achieved an average completion rate of 90% for data submission, with all domains rated equally relevant during post-pilot evaluations. Lessons included the need for supportive legislation, improved internal auditing practices and enhanced staff training, refinement of indicator data collection methods and alignment of indicators with hospital-specific contexts.

Conclusions: This work presents a significant stride in improving Romanian public hospitals' quality of care and patient safety. It underscores the importance of high-level commitment, stakeholder engagement, and robust data practices in driving successful quality improvement efforts. Emphasising the role of data-driven and patient-centric approaches in achieving optimal healthcare outcomes, lessons learned offer insights for the continuation of quality improvement work in Romania but also for healthcare systems elsewhere.