Nursing home leader response during COVID-19: a qualitative descriptive study about use of external resources during the pandemic.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMC Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11718-1
Amy Vogelsmeier, Lori L Popejoy, Alisha Harvey Johnson, Steven Miller, Lisa Young, Roy A Thompson, Lona Mody, Marilyn Rantz, David R Mehr
{"title":"Nursing home leader response during COVID-19: a qualitative descriptive study about use of external resources during the pandemic.","authors":"Amy Vogelsmeier, Lori L Popejoy, Alisha Harvey Johnson, Steven Miller, Lisa Young, Roy A Thompson, Lona Mody, Marilyn Rantz, David R Mehr","doi":"10.1186/s12913-024-11718-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>US nursing homes were ground zero for COVID-19 and nursing home leaders faced multiple challenges to keep residents and staff safe. Understanding the leader's role and their use of external resources to rapidly respond to the pandemic is important to better prepare for the next infectious disease outbreak emergency. The purpose of this study is to describe Missouri nursing home leaders' use of external resources to manage challenges encountered during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This qualitative descriptive study uses data from semi-structured interviews conducted with leaders from 24 Midwestern nursing homes between March 2022 and March 2023. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Dedoose software. Directed content analysis, guided by Donabedian's Structure, Process, Outcome framework, was used for analysis. Interviews were conducted as part of a larger mixed-methods study focused on developing knowledge and recommendations to improve US nursing homes' capacity to respond to infectious disease outbreaks.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-three interviews were conducted across the 24 homes. Participants included administrators (n = 24), nurse leaders (n = 19), and infection preventionists (n = 16). Six sub-categories of external resources/support were used by leaders to manage challenges during the pandemic:1) corporate support and communications, 2) statewide resources, 3) community-based resources, 4) health care coalitions focused on emergency response planning, 5) existing affiliations with local organizations i.e., hospitals, and 6) community members and families. Corporate support was a primary resource; however, it was limited to chain-based homes. Leaders from standalone homes seemed most reliant on statewide agencies, existing affiliations, and other community-based resources due to their lack of corporate connections. Health care coalitions were few, but when available, helped nursing homes prepare for the pandemic onset. Family and community members were vital despite being off-site from nursing homes at the pandemic onset.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Leaders played a pivotal role in accessing and using external resources to manage challenges during the pandemic. Statewide and community-based agencies and existing affiliations were particularly critical for standalone homes who otherwise had little to no means of support. Federal, state and local agencies must consider opportunities to build multi-agency regional collaborations, local health care coalitions and community-based partnerships that include nursing homes as member. Finally, community members and family were important in providing support, thus closing visitation is a double-edged sword that needs careful, future consideration.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476967/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11718-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: US nursing homes were ground zero for COVID-19 and nursing home leaders faced multiple challenges to keep residents and staff safe. Understanding the leader's role and their use of external resources to rapidly respond to the pandemic is important to better prepare for the next infectious disease outbreak emergency. The purpose of this study is to describe Missouri nursing home leaders' use of external resources to manage challenges encountered during the pandemic.

Methods: This qualitative descriptive study uses data from semi-structured interviews conducted with leaders from 24 Midwestern nursing homes between March 2022 and March 2023. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using Dedoose software. Directed content analysis, guided by Donabedian's Structure, Process, Outcome framework, was used for analysis. Interviews were conducted as part of a larger mixed-methods study focused on developing knowledge and recommendations to improve US nursing homes' capacity to respond to infectious disease outbreaks.

Results: Forty-three interviews were conducted across the 24 homes. Participants included administrators (n = 24), nurse leaders (n = 19), and infection preventionists (n = 16). Six sub-categories of external resources/support were used by leaders to manage challenges during the pandemic:1) corporate support and communications, 2) statewide resources, 3) community-based resources, 4) health care coalitions focused on emergency response planning, 5) existing affiliations with local organizations i.e., hospitals, and 6) community members and families. Corporate support was a primary resource; however, it was limited to chain-based homes. Leaders from standalone homes seemed most reliant on statewide agencies, existing affiliations, and other community-based resources due to their lack of corporate connections. Health care coalitions were few, but when available, helped nursing homes prepare for the pandemic onset. Family and community members were vital despite being off-site from nursing homes at the pandemic onset.

Conclusion: Leaders played a pivotal role in accessing and using external resources to manage challenges during the pandemic. Statewide and community-based agencies and existing affiliations were particularly critical for standalone homes who otherwise had little to no means of support. Federal, state and local agencies must consider opportunities to build multi-agency regional collaborations, local health care coalitions and community-based partnerships that include nursing homes as member. Finally, community members and family were important in providing support, thus closing visitation is a double-edged sword that needs careful, future consideration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理院领导在 COVID-19 期间的应对措施:关于大流行期间外部资源使用情况的定性描述性研究。
背景:美国养老院是 COVID-19 的原发地,养老院领导面临着保护居民和员工安全的多重挑战。了解领导者在快速应对大流行病时所扮演的角色及其对外部资源的使用情况,对于更好地应对下一次传染病爆发的紧急情况非常重要。本研究的目的是描述密苏里州养老院领导如何利用外部资源来应对大流行病期间遇到的挑战:这项定性描述性研究使用的数据来自 2022 年 3 月至 2023 年 3 月期间对 24 家中西部疗养院领导进行的半结构化访谈。访谈内容使用 Dedoose 软件进行逐字记录和分析。在唐纳贝迪安的结构、过程、结果框架指导下,采用了定向内容分析法进行分析。访谈是一项大型混合方法研究的一部分,该研究的重点是开发知识和提出建议,以提高美国养老院应对传染病爆发的能力:对 24 家养老院进行了 43 次访谈。参与者包括管理人员(24 人)、护士长(19 人)和感染预防专家(16 人)。领导者在应对大流行病期间的挑战时使用了六个子类别的外部资源/支持:1)企业支持和沟通;2)全州资源;3)社区资源;4)以应急计划为重点的医疗联盟;5)与当地组织(如医院)的现有联系;6)社区成员和家庭。企业支持是一种主要资源,但仅限于连锁安老院。由于缺乏与企业的联系,独立安老院的领导者似乎最依赖全州机构、现有的附属机构和其他社区资源。医疗保健联盟为数不多,但只要有,就能帮助养老院为大流行病的爆发做好准备。家庭和社区成员尽管在大流行开始时不在疗养院内,但也发挥了重要作用:在大流行期间,领导者在获取和利用外部资源应对挑战方面发挥了关键作用。全州和社区机构以及现有的附属机构对独立的养老院尤为重要,否则这些养老院几乎得不到任何支持。联邦、州和地方机构必须考虑建立多机构地区合作、地方医疗保健联盟和社区合作关系的机会,将养老院纳入其中。最后,社区成员和家庭在提供支持方面非常重要,因此关闭探视是一把双刃剑,需要在未来仔细考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
期刊最新文献
Employer support for health and social care registered professionals, their patients and service users involved in regulatory fitness to practise regulatory proceedings. Factors influencing the turnover intention for disease control and prevention workers in Northeast China: an empirical analysis based on logistic-ISM model. Qualitative drivers of postoperative prophylactic antibiotics use and resistance in Ethiopia. Supporting young people through the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: a multi-site qualitative longitudinal study. The potential promise and pitfalls of point-of-care viral load monitoring to expedite HIV treatment decision-making in rural Uganda: a qualitative study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1