Artificial intelligence in traumatology.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING Bone & Joint Research Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1302/2046-3758.1310.BJR-2023-0275.R3
Rosmarie Breu, Carolina Avelar, Zsolt Bertalan, Johannes Grillari, Heinz Redl, Richard Ljuhar, Stefan Quadlbauer, Thomas Hausner
{"title":"Artificial intelligence in traumatology.","authors":"Rosmarie Breu, Carolina Avelar, Zsolt Bertalan, Johannes Grillari, Heinz Redl, Richard Ljuhar, Stefan Quadlbauer, Thomas Hausner","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.1310.BJR-2023-0275.R3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to create artificial intelligence (AI) software with the purpose of providing a second opinion to physicians to support distal radius fracture (DRF) detection, and to compare the accuracy of fracture detection of physicians with and without software support.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The dataset consisted of 26,121 anonymized anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral standard view radiographs of the wrist, with and without DRF. The convolutional neural network (CNN) model was trained to detect the presence of a DRF by comparing the radiographs containing a fracture to the inconspicuous ones. A total of 11 physicians (six surgeons in training and five hand surgeons) assessed 200 pairs of randomly selected digital radiographs of the wrist (AP and lateral) for the presence of a DRF. The same images were first evaluated without, and then with, the support of the CNN model, and the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods was compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At the time of the study, the CNN model showed an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.97. AI assistance improved the physician's sensitivity (correct fracture detection) from 80% to 87%, and the specificity (correct fracture exclusion) from 91% to 95%. The overall error rate (combined false positive and false negative) was reduced from 14% without AI to 9% with AI.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of a CNN model as a second opinion can improve the diagnostic accuracy of DRF detection in the study setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":9074,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Research","volume":"13 10","pages":"588-595"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484119/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.1310.BJR-2023-0275.R3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to create artificial intelligence (AI) software with the purpose of providing a second opinion to physicians to support distal radius fracture (DRF) detection, and to compare the accuracy of fracture detection of physicians with and without software support.

Methods: The dataset consisted of 26,121 anonymized anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral standard view radiographs of the wrist, with and without DRF. The convolutional neural network (CNN) model was trained to detect the presence of a DRF by comparing the radiographs containing a fracture to the inconspicuous ones. A total of 11 physicians (six surgeons in training and five hand surgeons) assessed 200 pairs of randomly selected digital radiographs of the wrist (AP and lateral) for the presence of a DRF. The same images were first evaluated without, and then with, the support of the CNN model, and the diagnostic accuracy of the two methods was compared.

Results: At the time of the study, the CNN model showed an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.97. AI assistance improved the physician's sensitivity (correct fracture detection) from 80% to 87%, and the specificity (correct fracture exclusion) from 91% to 95%. The overall error rate (combined false positive and false negative) was reduced from 14% without AI to 9% with AI.

Conclusion: The use of a CNN model as a second opinion can improve the diagnostic accuracy of DRF detection in the study setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤学中的人工智能。
目的:本研究旨在创建人工智能(AI)软件,为医生提供第二意见,以支持桡骨远端骨折(DRF)检测,并比较有软件支持和没有软件支持的医生的骨折检测准确性:数据集包括 26121 张匿名的腕关节前后位(AP)和侧位标准视图射线照片,包括有无桡骨远端骨折。对卷积神经网络(CNN)模型进行了训练,通过比较有骨折和无骨折的X光片来检测是否存在DRF。共有 11 名医生(其中 6 名外科医生正在接受培训,5 名手外科医生)对随机选取的 200 对腕部数字 X 光片(正侧位和侧位)进行了评估,以确定是否存在 DRF。首先在没有 CNN 模型支持的情况下评估相同的图像,然后在有 CNN 模型支持的情况下评估相同的图像,并比较两种方法的诊断准确性:研究结果表明,CNN 模型的接收器工作曲线下面积为 0.97。人工智能辅助将医生的灵敏度(正确的骨折检测)从 80% 提高到 87%,特异性(正确的骨折排除)从 91% 提高到 95%。总体错误率(假阳性和假阴性的总和)从无人工智能时的 14% 降至有人工智能时的 9%:结论:在研究环境中,使用 CNN 模型作为第二意见可提高 DRF 检测的诊断准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Research
Bone & Joint Research CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING-ORTHOPEDICS
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
23.90%
发文量
156
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The gold open access journal for the musculoskeletal sciences. Included in PubMed and available in PubMed Central.
期刊最新文献
Multidimensional characteristics are associated with pain severity in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Inhibition of PA28γ expression can alleviate osteoarthritis by inhibiting endoplasmic reticulum stress and promoting STAT3 phosphorylation. Urgent focus on enhanced recovery after surgery of AIDS patients with limb fractures. The antimicrobial properties of exogenous copper in human synovial fluid against Staphylococcus aureus. Efficacy of a saline wash plus vancomycin/tobramycin-doped PVA composite (PVA-VAN/TOB-P) in a mouse pouch infection model implanted with 3D-printed porous titanium cylinders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1