Whole Blood Transcriptomics Identifies Differences in Innate Immune Pathway Expression in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Clinical and Experimental Allergy Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1111/cea.14587
Abigail Lang, Samantha Gadd, Lauren Gunderman, Elizabeth Lippner, Ashley Devonshire, Matthew J. Schipma, Sergejs Berdnikovs, Rajesh Kumar
{"title":"Whole Blood Transcriptomics Identifies Differences in Innate Immune Pathway Expression in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy","authors":"Abigail Lang,&nbsp;Samantha Gadd,&nbsp;Lauren Gunderman,&nbsp;Elizabeth Lippner,&nbsp;Ashley Devonshire,&nbsp;Matthew J. Schipma,&nbsp;Sergejs Berdnikovs,&nbsp;Rajesh Kumar","doi":"10.1111/cea.14587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Peanut allergy affects up to 2%–4% of children in the United States [<span>1</span>]. Despite advances in peanut allergy prevention through early introduction [<span>2</span>], there is limited understanding of molecular processes that drive development of peanut allergy. Similarly, differences between infants who tolerate peanut but demonstrate allergic sensitization and those with clinical reactivity to peanut are poorly understood. In a pilot study by our group, infants at high risk for peanut allergy demonstrated differential gene expression by clinical phenotype, but the magnitude of differences was not clinically significant given the variance of expression [<span>3</span>]. Further exploration of gene networks from differentially expressed gene (DEG) signatures may provide better targets for future studies. The primary objective of this study was to analyse the transcriptomic signature of a cohort of infants at risk for peanut allergy utilising whole blood RNA sequencing. We hypothesized that infants with peanut allergy would have differential expression of genes involved in immune pathways when compared to infants tolerant of peanut, with or without sensitization to peanut.</p><p>Infants aged 4–11 months (<i>n</i> = 70) with peanut allergy risk factors (egg allergy, moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, or both) were recruited from Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago between 2018 and 2021. Subjects were classified as either peanut non-allergic (PNA), peanut sensitised (PS), or peanut allergic (PA). PA subjects had a convincing clinical history of reaction to peanut and peanut skin prick (SPT) wheal ≥ 3 mm or peanut SPT wheal ≥ 8 mm without history of consumption. Subjects regularly consuming peanut without history of an adverse reaction to peanut or who had never consumed peanut and had peanut SPT wheal size of 0–2 mm were classified as PNA. Infants who had ingested peanut without clinical reaction or passed a peanut oral food challenge (OFC) and had a peanut SPT wheal size of 3–7 mm or positive peanut specific IgE (sIgE) were classified as PS.</p><p>RNA-seq was performed on whole blood. Deconvolution of gene expression by immune cell type showed no clinically significant differences between peanut allergy groups. Comparison of gene expression profiles by peanut allergy status was carried out using <i>DESeq2</i> [<span>4</span>]. DEGs were split into upregulated and downregulated groups and were analysed separately in pathway analyses performed using Metascape [<span>5</span>]. Significant differences in single gene expression between groups were reported if there was ≥ ± absolute log<sub>2</sub> fold change of 0.3 and FDR-corrected <i>p</i> ≤ 0.05.</p><p>Half of the population was PNA (<i>n =</i> 35, 50%), 12 subjects (17%) were PS, and 23 subjects were PA (33%). Most subjects in each sub-group were male and had eczema. When adjusted for multiple comparisons, there were no statistically significant DEGs between PA and PNA subjects and PA and PS subjects. <i>CLEC12B</i>, a C-type lectin receptor exclusively expressed on skin mast cells, was up-regulated in PS versus PNA subjects (fold change 1.3, FDR <i>p</i>-value 0.012). Pathway analyses demonstrated upregulation of innate immune response, neutrophil degranulation, and cytokine signalling in PS as compared to PNA subjects. Inflammatory responses, innate immune responses, neutrophil degranulation, and regulation of immune effector processes were all down-regulated pathways in PA versus PS subjects (Figure 1).</p><p>While there were few singly DEGs between peanut allergy groups, pathway analyses revealed several uniquely downregulated pathways in subjects with peanut allergy. The most highly down-regulated pathways in infants with peanut allergy as compared to those sensitised but tolerant to peanut were inflammatory and innate immune responses. The role of the innate immune response in molecular recognition of food allergens and the development of food allergy has been previously described [<span>6, 7</span>]. Our results of decreased innate immune signatures in PA subjects are in line with findings from studies of early life development of wheeze and asthma. Consensus from childhood allergic asthma studies has demonstrated shifts to Th2 immunity and decreased innate immune gene expression, likely because of early imbalance in Th2/Th1 immunity or a general decrease in host defence capability, which may underlie susceptibility to allergic disease [<span>8</span>]. These findings highlight the necessity to understand the timing and nature of immune developmental defects associated with impaired innate immune response and development of food allergy. Further dissection in a longitudinal study to determine which genes are drivers for our pathway results will be important.</p><p>This study was not without limitations. Our classification of peanut allergy was primarily based on reported clinical history, and not all patients underwent OFC to confirm peanut allergy status. We did not have samples to perform single cell RNA sequencing and may have missed some unique DEGs in single cell populations. However, previous studies have demonstrated the utility of using whole blood for RNA extraction, finding associations with genes which would not have been expressed in single cell data [<span>3, 9</span>]. Limitations on blood volume collection in infants restricted additional sample collection for confirmatory functional testing.</p><p>Elucidating biologic pathways that distinguish infants who are sensitised but clinically tolerant to peanut from those infants who are truly peanut-allergic is necessary to help implement allergy prevention and treatment strategies. This study is one of the largest to examine whole blood transcriptomic expression profiles in infants at high risk of peanut allergy. These results suggest that disruption of the innate immune response may play a role in peanut allergy development. It is increasingly recognised that control and coordination of innate immunity is needed to maintain equilibrium with appropriate responses to viral infections, immune tolerance, and prevention of atopy. Further investigation of the innate immune response in infants at high-risk of peanut allergy may have implications for the development of clinical reactivity in sensitised individuals.</p><p>Abigail Lang assisted with interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript. Lauren Gunderman and Elizabeth Lippner assisted with critical appraisal of the analyses and revised the manuscript. Samantha Gadd and Matthew J. Schipma analysed the RNA-sequencing data and performed bioinformatics. Ashley Devonshire assisted with initial study design and acquisition of the original data and interpretation of findings, in addition to providing critical appraisal of the analyses and manuscript. Sergejs Berdnikovs provided critical review and interpretation of the results and contributed to writing the manuscript. Rajesh Kumar supervised the analysis and interpretation of results with critical review of the intellectual content of the manuscript. All listed authors have given final approval of the submitted version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work related to its accuracy and integrity.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":10207,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","volume":"55 1","pages":"100-103"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707303/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cea.14587","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Peanut allergy affects up to 2%–4% of children in the United States [1]. Despite advances in peanut allergy prevention through early introduction [2], there is limited understanding of molecular processes that drive development of peanut allergy. Similarly, differences between infants who tolerate peanut but demonstrate allergic sensitization and those with clinical reactivity to peanut are poorly understood. In a pilot study by our group, infants at high risk for peanut allergy demonstrated differential gene expression by clinical phenotype, but the magnitude of differences was not clinically significant given the variance of expression [3]. Further exploration of gene networks from differentially expressed gene (DEG) signatures may provide better targets for future studies. The primary objective of this study was to analyse the transcriptomic signature of a cohort of infants at risk for peanut allergy utilising whole blood RNA sequencing. We hypothesized that infants with peanut allergy would have differential expression of genes involved in immune pathways when compared to infants tolerant of peanut, with or without sensitization to peanut.

Infants aged 4–11 months (n = 70) with peanut allergy risk factors (egg allergy, moderate to severe atopic dermatitis, or both) were recruited from Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago between 2018 and 2021. Subjects were classified as either peanut non-allergic (PNA), peanut sensitised (PS), or peanut allergic (PA). PA subjects had a convincing clinical history of reaction to peanut and peanut skin prick (SPT) wheal ≥ 3 mm or peanut SPT wheal ≥ 8 mm without history of consumption. Subjects regularly consuming peanut without history of an adverse reaction to peanut or who had never consumed peanut and had peanut SPT wheal size of 0–2 mm were classified as PNA. Infants who had ingested peanut without clinical reaction or passed a peanut oral food challenge (OFC) and had a peanut SPT wheal size of 3–7 mm or positive peanut specific IgE (sIgE) were classified as PS.

RNA-seq was performed on whole blood. Deconvolution of gene expression by immune cell type showed no clinically significant differences between peanut allergy groups. Comparison of gene expression profiles by peanut allergy status was carried out using DESeq2 [4]. DEGs were split into upregulated and downregulated groups and were analysed separately in pathway analyses performed using Metascape [5]. Significant differences in single gene expression between groups were reported if there was ≥ ± absolute log2 fold change of 0.3 and FDR-corrected p ≤ 0.05.

Half of the population was PNA (n = 35, 50%), 12 subjects (17%) were PS, and 23 subjects were PA (33%). Most subjects in each sub-group were male and had eczema. When adjusted for multiple comparisons, there were no statistically significant DEGs between PA and PNA subjects and PA and PS subjects. CLEC12B, a C-type lectin receptor exclusively expressed on skin mast cells, was up-regulated in PS versus PNA subjects (fold change 1.3, FDR p-value 0.012). Pathway analyses demonstrated upregulation of innate immune response, neutrophil degranulation, and cytokine signalling in PS as compared to PNA subjects. Inflammatory responses, innate immune responses, neutrophil degranulation, and regulation of immune effector processes were all down-regulated pathways in PA versus PS subjects (Figure 1).

While there were few singly DEGs between peanut allergy groups, pathway analyses revealed several uniquely downregulated pathways in subjects with peanut allergy. The most highly down-regulated pathways in infants with peanut allergy as compared to those sensitised but tolerant to peanut were inflammatory and innate immune responses. The role of the innate immune response in molecular recognition of food allergens and the development of food allergy has been previously described [6, 7]. Our results of decreased innate immune signatures in PA subjects are in line with findings from studies of early life development of wheeze and asthma. Consensus from childhood allergic asthma studies has demonstrated shifts to Th2 immunity and decreased innate immune gene expression, likely because of early imbalance in Th2/Th1 immunity or a general decrease in host defence capability, which may underlie susceptibility to allergic disease [8]. These findings highlight the necessity to understand the timing and nature of immune developmental defects associated with impaired innate immune response and development of food allergy. Further dissection in a longitudinal study to determine which genes are drivers for our pathway results will be important.

This study was not without limitations. Our classification of peanut allergy was primarily based on reported clinical history, and not all patients underwent OFC to confirm peanut allergy status. We did not have samples to perform single cell RNA sequencing and may have missed some unique DEGs in single cell populations. However, previous studies have demonstrated the utility of using whole blood for RNA extraction, finding associations with genes which would not have been expressed in single cell data [3, 9]. Limitations on blood volume collection in infants restricted additional sample collection for confirmatory functional testing.

Elucidating biologic pathways that distinguish infants who are sensitised but clinically tolerant to peanut from those infants who are truly peanut-allergic is necessary to help implement allergy prevention and treatment strategies. This study is one of the largest to examine whole blood transcriptomic expression profiles in infants at high risk of peanut allergy. These results suggest that disruption of the innate immune response may play a role in peanut allergy development. It is increasingly recognised that control and coordination of innate immunity is needed to maintain equilibrium with appropriate responses to viral infections, immune tolerance, and prevention of atopy. Further investigation of the innate immune response in infants at high-risk of peanut allergy may have implications for the development of clinical reactivity in sensitised individuals.

Abigail Lang assisted with interpretation of the data and drafted the manuscript. Lauren Gunderman and Elizabeth Lippner assisted with critical appraisal of the analyses and revised the manuscript. Samantha Gadd and Matthew J. Schipma analysed the RNA-sequencing data and performed bioinformatics. Ashley Devonshire assisted with initial study design and acquisition of the original data and interpretation of findings, in addition to providing critical appraisal of the analyses and manuscript. Sergejs Berdnikovs provided critical review and interpretation of the results and contributed to writing the manuscript. Rajesh Kumar supervised the analysis and interpretation of results with critical review of the intellectual content of the manuscript. All listed authors have given final approval of the submitted version of the manuscript and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work related to its accuracy and integrity.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全血转录组学确定了有花生过敏风险的婴儿先天性免疫途径表达的差异。
在美国,花生过敏影响了2%-4%的儿童。尽管通过早期引入[2]在花生过敏预防方面取得了进展,但对驱动花生过敏发展的分子过程的了解有限。同样,耐受花生但表现出过敏反应的婴儿与对花生有临床反应的婴儿之间的差异也知之甚少。在我们小组的一项初步研究中,花生过敏高危婴儿在临床表型上表现出基因表达差异,但考虑到表达差异[3],差异的幅度在临床上并不显著。从差异表达基因(DEG)特征进一步探索基因网络可能为未来的研究提供更好的靶点。本研究的主要目的是利用全血RNA测序分析一组有花生过敏风险的婴儿的转录组特征。我们假设,与对花生过敏或不过敏的婴儿相比,花生过敏的婴儿在免疫途径相关基因的表达上存在差异。在2018年至2021年期间,从芝加哥安和罗伯特·h·卢里儿童医院招募了4-11个月的婴儿(n = 70),他们有花生过敏危险因素(鸡蛋过敏,中度至重度特应性皮炎,或两者兼有)。受试者被分为花生非过敏(PNA)、花生致敏(PS)和花生过敏(PA)。PA受试者有令人信服的花生和花生皮刺(SPT)轮≥3 mm或花生皮刺(SPT)轮≥8 mm的临床反应史,无食用史。经常食用花生而无花生不良反应史或从未食用花生且花生SPT轮大小为0-2 mm的受试者被归类为PNA。将摄入花生无临床反应或通过花生口服食物刺激(OFC)、花生SPT轮大小为3-7 mm或花生特异性IgE (sIgE)阳性的婴儿归类为ps,并对全血进行rna -seq测定。花生过敏组间免疫细胞类型基因表达反褶积差异无临床意义。使用DESeq2[4]比较花生过敏状态的基因表达谱。deg被分为上调组和下调组,并在使用Metascape[5]进行的通路分析中分别进行分析。如果单基因表达≥±log2倍的绝对变化为0.3,fdr校正后的p≤0.05,则组间单基因表达差异有统计学意义。半数为PNA (n = 35, 50%), 12例为PS(17%), 23例为PA(33%)。每个亚组中大多数受试者为患有湿疹的男性。经多重比较调整后,PA与PNA受试者、PA与PS受试者之间的差异无统计学意义。CLEC12B是一种仅在皮肤肥大细胞上表达的c型凝集素受体,在PS与PNA受试者中表达上调(倍数变化1.3,FDR p值0.012)。途径分析表明,与PNA受试者相比,PS的先天免疫反应、中性粒细胞脱颗粒和细胞因子信号传导上调。炎症反应、先天免疫反应、中性粒细胞脱颗粒和免疫效应过程的调节在PA和PS受试者中都是下调的通路(图1)。虽然花生过敏组之间几乎没有单一的deg,但通路分析显示花生过敏受试者中有几个独特的下调通路。与对花生敏感但耐受的婴儿相比,花生过敏婴儿中最高度下调的途径是炎症和先天免疫反应。先天免疫反应在食物过敏原分子识别和食物过敏发生中的作用已有报道[6,7]。我们的研究结果表明,先天免疫特征在PA受试者中下降,这与早期喘息和哮喘发展的研究结果一致。来自儿童过敏性哮喘研究的共识表明,Th2免疫的转变和先天免疫基因表达的下降,可能是由于Th2/Th1免疫的早期失衡或宿主防御能力的普遍下降,这可能是过敏性疾病[8]易感性的基础。这些发现强调了了解与先天免疫反应受损和食物过敏发展相关的免疫发育缺陷的时间和性质的必要性。在纵向研究中进一步解剖,以确定哪些基因是我们途径结果的驱动因素将是重要的。这项研究并非没有局限性。我们对花生过敏的分类主要基于报告的临床病史,并不是所有患者都接受了OFC来确认花生过敏状态。我们没有样本来进行单细胞RNA测序,可能在单细胞群体中遗漏了一些独特的deg。 然而,先前的研究已经证明了使用全血提取RNA的实用性,发现了与单细胞数据中无法表达的基因的关联[3,9]。婴儿血容量采集的限制限制了额外的样本采集以进行确证性功能检测。阐明区分对花生敏感但临床耐受的婴儿与真正花生过敏的婴儿的生物学途径对于帮助实施过敏预防和治疗策略是必要的。这项研究是对花生过敏高风险婴儿全血转录组表达谱进行研究的最大研究之一。这些结果表明,先天免疫反应的破坏可能在花生过敏的发展中起作用。人们越来越认识到,需要控制和协调先天免疫,以保持对病毒感染、免疫耐受和预防特应性的适当反应的平衡。对花生过敏高危婴儿先天免疫反应的进一步研究可能对过敏个体临床反应性的发展具有指导意义。Abigail Lang协助解读数据并起草手稿。劳伦·冈德曼(Lauren Gunderman)和伊丽莎白·利普纳(Elizabeth Lippner)协助对分析进行了批判性评估,并修改了手稿。Samantha Gadd和Matthew J. Schipma分析了rna测序数据并进行了生物信息学分析。Ashley Devonshire协助最初的研究设计和原始数据的获取以及对研究结果的解释,此外还提供了对分析和手稿的批判性评估。Sergejs Berdnikovs对结果进行了批判性的审查和解释,并为撰写手稿做出了贡献。拉杰什·库马尔(Rajesh Kumar)监督对结果的分析和解释,并对手稿的知识内容进行批判性审查。所有列出的作者都对所提交的手稿版本给予最终批准,并同意对其准确性和完整性相关工作的各个方面负责。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
9.80%
发文量
189
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical & Experimental Allergy strikes an excellent balance between clinical and scientific articles and carries regular reviews and editorials written by leading authorities in their field. In response to the increasing number of quality submissions, since 1996 the journals size has increased by over 30%. Clinical & Experimental Allergy is essential reading for allergy practitioners and research scientists with an interest in allergic diseases and mechanisms. Truly international in appeal, Clinical & Experimental Allergy publishes clinical and experimental observations in disease in all fields of medicine in which allergic hypersensitivity plays a part.
期刊最新文献
Respiratory Viral Infections and the Tonsillar Transcriptome: An Exploratory Study. Circulating Piwi-Interacting RNAs Associate With Childhood Asthma ICS Response With Vitamin D Effect Modification. T Cell O-GlcNAcylation Increases in Patients With Allergic Rhinitis After the Natural Pollen Season. Residential Greenness and Incident Chronic Rhinosinusitis After SARS-CoV-2 Infection in South Korea: A Nationwide Cohort Study. Low-Dose, Slow-Escalation Home-Based and Sustainable Oral Immunotherapy for Walnut and Cashew Allergy: A Retrospective Case Series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1