{"title":"Cesarean Section Is a Risk Factor That Prevents Organ Transplantation by Increasing the Development of Anti-HLA Antibodies in Women","authors":"Gökhan Akyüz, Hasan Doğan","doi":"10.1111/ctr.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>In this study, prenatal and postnatal blood samples were taken from pregnant women who had 35 or more gestational weeks and had not developed anti-HLA positivity yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors that may be effective in the development of panel reactive antibody (PRA) positivity during pregnancy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>PRA testing was studied by taking the blood of 86 pregnant women 1 month before birth. Blood was taken again 1 month after birth from these women with prenatal PRA negative and it was checked whether PRA positivity developed. As a control group, 40 women without pregnancy were selected for the study.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Of the 86 pregnant, 42 (48.8%) had cesarean sections, 44 (51.2%) had normal births, and PRA positivity developed in 14 (32.5%) of cesarean deliveries and three (8.0%) of normal births. In the control group, there were three (7.5%) PRA positivity. A statistically significant difference was found between cesarean delivery, normal delivery, and control group. Moreover, when compared with the control group, it was found statistically significant that all deliveries increased the development of HLA Class II antibodies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>Cesarean delivery was associated with increased PRA positivity compared to normal birth. The new information presented in this study will pave the way for further research and enable healthcare professionals to consider both the individual's potential future need for organ transplantation and the positive impact on public health and more effective management of healthcare costs when making decisions regarding cesarean section.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10467,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Transplantation","volume":"38 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ctr.70005","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ctr.70005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
In this study, prenatal and postnatal blood samples were taken from pregnant women who had 35 or more gestational weeks and had not developed anti-HLA positivity yet. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors that may be effective in the development of panel reactive antibody (PRA) positivity during pregnancy.
Methods
PRA testing was studied by taking the blood of 86 pregnant women 1 month before birth. Blood was taken again 1 month after birth from these women with prenatal PRA negative and it was checked whether PRA positivity developed. As a control group, 40 women without pregnancy were selected for the study.
Results
Of the 86 pregnant, 42 (48.8%) had cesarean sections, 44 (51.2%) had normal births, and PRA positivity developed in 14 (32.5%) of cesarean deliveries and three (8.0%) of normal births. In the control group, there were three (7.5%) PRA positivity. A statistically significant difference was found between cesarean delivery, normal delivery, and control group. Moreover, when compared with the control group, it was found statistically significant that all deliveries increased the development of HLA Class II antibodies.
Discussion
Cesarean delivery was associated with increased PRA positivity compared to normal birth. The new information presented in this study will pave the way for further research and enable healthcare professionals to consider both the individual's potential future need for organ transplantation and the positive impact on public health and more effective management of healthcare costs when making decisions regarding cesarean section.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research aims to serve as a channel of rapid communication for all those involved in the care of patients who require, or have had, organ or tissue transplants, including: kidney, intestine, liver, pancreas, islets, heart, heart valves, lung, bone marrow, cornea, skin, bone, and cartilage, viable or stored.
Published monthly, Clinical Transplantation’s scope is focused on the complete spectrum of present transplant therapies, as well as also those that are experimental or may become possible in future. Topics include:
Immunology and immunosuppression;
Patient preparation;
Social, ethical, and psychological issues;
Complications, short- and long-term results;
Artificial organs;
Donation and preservation of organ and tissue;
Translational studies;
Advances in tissue typing;
Updates on transplant pathology;.
Clinical and translational studies are particularly welcome, as well as focused reviews. Full-length papers and short communications are invited. Clinical reviews are encouraged, as well as seminal papers in basic science which might lead to immediate clinical application. Prominence is regularly given to the results of cooperative surveys conducted by the organ and tissue transplant registries.
Clinical Transplantation: The Journal of Clinical and Translational Research is essential reading for clinicians and researchers in the diverse field of transplantation: surgeons; clinical immunologists; cryobiologists; hematologists; gastroenterologists; hepatologists; pulmonologists; nephrologists; cardiologists; and endocrinologists. It will also be of interest to sociologists, psychologists, research workers, and to all health professionals whose combined efforts will improve the prognosis of transplant recipients.