Developing a compassionate university: Insights from a longitudinal process evaluation.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Death Studies Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1080/07481187.2024.2420241
Hanne Bakelants, Filip Van Droogenbroeck, Liesbeth De Donder, Kenneth Chambaere, Luc Deliens, Steven Vanderstichelen, Joachim Cohen, Sarah Dury
{"title":"Developing a compassionate university: Insights from a longitudinal process evaluation.","authors":"Hanne Bakelants, Filip Van Droogenbroeck, Liesbeth De Donder, Kenneth Chambaere, Luc Deliens, Steven Vanderstichelen, Joachim Cohen, Sarah Dury","doi":"10.1080/07481187.2024.2420241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Compassionate communities are gaining momentum as a new public health approach emphasizing community support during times of serious illness, death, and bereavement. However, evidence on their development, particularly in higher education, is limited. This study investigates the development of a Compassionate University, examining the underlying processes and contextual factors shaping its development. A longitudinal process evaluation was conducted, using field notes right-now surveys, individual interviews, focus groups, and strategic learning debriefs. Factors that facilitated the development process included leadership support, the establishment of the Compassionate Schools Learning Network, and alignment with existing university programs. Barriers were the lack of guiding examples, the fragmented university environment, resource constraints, and limited prioritization. Cognitive and social processes that supported the work involved recognizing the value of Compassionate University and adapting implementation strategies based on empirical feedback. However, challenges such as building coherence, engaging stakeholders, and assessing the work hampered the development process.</p>","PeriodicalId":11041,"journal":{"name":"Death Studies","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Death Studies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2024.2420241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Compassionate communities are gaining momentum as a new public health approach emphasizing community support during times of serious illness, death, and bereavement. However, evidence on their development, particularly in higher education, is limited. This study investigates the development of a Compassionate University, examining the underlying processes and contextual factors shaping its development. A longitudinal process evaluation was conducted, using field notes right-now surveys, individual interviews, focus groups, and strategic learning debriefs. Factors that facilitated the development process included leadership support, the establishment of the Compassionate Schools Learning Network, and alignment with existing university programs. Barriers were the lack of guiding examples, the fragmented university environment, resource constraints, and limited prioritization. Cognitive and social processes that supported the work involved recognizing the value of Compassionate University and adapting implementation strategies based on empirical feedback. However, challenges such as building coherence, engaging stakeholders, and assessing the work hampered the development process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展富有同情心的大学:纵向过程评估的启示。
慈悲社区作为一种新的公共卫生方法,强调在重病、死亡和丧亲之痛时提供社区支持,其发展势头日益强劲。然而,有关其发展的证据却很有限,尤其是在高等教育中。本研究调查了 "仁爱大学 "的发展情况,研究了影响其发展的基本过程和背景因素。研究采用了现场笔记调查、个人访谈、焦点小组和战略学习汇报等方法,进行了纵向过程评估。促进发展过程的因素包括领导的支持、仁爱学校学习网络的建立以及与现有大学计划的协调。阻碍因素包括缺乏指导范例、大学环境分散、资源限制以及优先次序有限。支持这项工作的认知和社会过程包括认识到 "仁爱大学 "的价值,并根据经验反馈调整实施策略。然而,建立一致性、吸引利益相关者参与和评估工作等挑战阻碍了发展进程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Death Studies
Death Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
7.90%
发文量
94
期刊介绍: Now published ten times each year, this acclaimed journal provides refereed papers on significant research, scholarship, and practical approaches in the fast growing areas of bereavement and loss, grief therapy, death attitudes, suicide, and death education. It provides an international interdisciplinary forum in which a variety of professionals share results of research and practice, with the aim of better understanding the human encounter with death and assisting those who work with the dying and their families.
期刊最新文献
Perinatal death, collective action and legislation against obstetric violence in Argentina. Barriers and solutions to equitable funeral care in the U.S. for the LGBTQIA+ community. Correction. Experiences of maternal-fetal medicine specialists conducting feticide. Network analysis of prolonged grief disorder and anxiety symptoms among bereaved Chinese parents who lost their only child.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1