Low-Level Laser and LED Therapy in Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY Dermatologic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000004442
Sofia M Perez, Mounika Vattigunta, Colin Kelly, Ariel Eber
{"title":"Low-Level Laser and LED Therapy in Alopecia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Sofia M Perez, Mounika Vattigunta, Colin Kelly, Ariel Eber","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000004442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low-level laser/LED therapy (LLLT) has been described as a treatment option for alopecia, but no study has comprehensively reviewed its efficacy in multiple alopecia types.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To review and evaluate LLLT for various alopecia types.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted to identify studies assessing the effect of LLLT on patients diagnosed with alopecia. Prespecified outcome measure was the change in hair density. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the standardized mean difference in hair density before and after LLLT compared with placebo.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight studies were included that described 3,098 patients with androgenetic alopecia (2,930/3,098), scarring alopecia (49/3,098), alopecia areata (50/3,098), telogen effluvium (17/3,098), and chemotherapy-induced alopecia (32/3,098). The mean change in hair density increased significantly in androgenetic alopecia patients after LLLT for 4 to 26 weeks compared with placebo (<20 weeks: SMD = 1.14; 95% CI [0.51-1.78]; p = .000; I2 = 88.26%; >20 weeks: SMD = 1.44; 95% CI [0.97-1.91]; p = .000; I2 = 80.81%). Change in hair density was reported in 5 studies evaluating other alopecia types; however, statistical information was insufficient for meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LLLT is a promising treatment option for patients with androgenetic alopecia, but future studies are needed to better understand its efficacy in other alopecia types.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000004442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Low-level laser/LED therapy (LLLT) has been described as a treatment option for alopecia, but no study has comprehensively reviewed its efficacy in multiple alopecia types.

Objective: To review and evaluate LLLT for various alopecia types.

Materials and methods: A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL was conducted to identify studies assessing the effect of LLLT on patients diagnosed with alopecia. Prespecified outcome measure was the change in hair density. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the standardized mean difference in hair density before and after LLLT compared with placebo.

Results: Thirty-eight studies were included that described 3,098 patients with androgenetic alopecia (2,930/3,098), scarring alopecia (49/3,098), alopecia areata (50/3,098), telogen effluvium (17/3,098), and chemotherapy-induced alopecia (32/3,098). The mean change in hair density increased significantly in androgenetic alopecia patients after LLLT for 4 to 26 weeks compared with placebo (<20 weeks: SMD = 1.14; 95% CI [0.51-1.78]; p = .000; I2 = 88.26%; >20 weeks: SMD = 1.44; 95% CI [0.97-1.91]; p = .000; I2 = 80.81%). Change in hair density was reported in 5 studies evaluating other alopecia types; however, statistical information was insufficient for meta-analysis.

Conclusion: LLLT is a promising treatment option for patients with androgenetic alopecia, but future studies are needed to better understand its efficacy in other alopecia types.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
低强度激光和 LED 治疗脱发:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:低强度激光/LED疗法(LLLT)已被描述为治疗脱发的一种选择,但还没有研究对其在多种脱发类型中的疗效进行全面评估:回顾并评估 LLLT 治疗各种类型脱发的效果:对 PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase 和 CENTRAL 进行了系统检索,以确定评估 LLLT 对确诊脱发患者疗效的研究。预设的结果测量指标为毛发密度的变化。通过进行 Meta 分析,计算出 LLLT 治疗前后头发密度与安慰剂相比的标准化平均差异:结果:共纳入了 38 项研究,这些研究描述了 3098 名雄激素性脱发患者(2930 人/3098 人)、瘢痕性脱发患者(49 人/3098 人)、斑秃患者(50 人/3098 人)、毛发脱落症患者(17 人/3098 人)以及化疗引起的脱发患者(32 人/3098 人)。与安慰剂相比,雄激素性脱发患者在接受 LLLT 治疗 4 到 26 周后,头发密度的平均变化明显增加(20 周:SMD = 1.44;95% CI [0.97-1.91];p = .000;I2 = 80.81%)。5项评估其他脱发类型的研究报告了头发密度的变化,但统计信息不足以进行荟萃分析:结论:对于雄激素性脱发患者来说,LLLT 是一种很有前景的治疗方法,但还需要进行更多研究,以更好地了解它对其他类型脱发的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
期刊最新文献
A Review of Best Practices for Gender-Affirming Laser Hair Removal. Sloppy Language: How Loose Terminology to Describe Patients Obfuscates the Dermatologic Diversity Literature and Invalidates Our Databases. A Review of Aesthetic Considerations for Treating the Transgender Patient. Analysis of the Commitment to Diversity in Dermatology: Reviewing Content on Societies' Websites and Instagram Posts. Reconstruction of a Large Glabellar Defect.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1