Impact of disclosing a working diagnosis during simulated patient handoff presentation in the emergency department: correctness matters.

Abstract

Introduction: Diagnostic errors in emergency departments (ED) are a significant concern and exacerbated by cognitive biases during patient handoffs. The timing and accuracy of disclosing working diagnoses during these handoffs potentially influence diagnostic decisions, yet empirical evidence remains limited.

Materials and methods: This parallel, quasi-experimental study involved 40 interns from Japanese teaching hospitals, randomly assigned to control or intervention groups. Each group reviewed eight audio-recorded patient handoff scenarios where working diagnoses were disclosed at the start (control) or end (intervention). Four cases presented correct diagnoses, while four featured incorrect ones. The main measure was diagnostic error rate, calculated as the proportion of incorrect post-handoff responses to total questions asked.

Results: No significant difference in diagnostic error rates emerged between the control (39.4 %, 63/160) and intervention (38.8 %, 62/160) groups (point estimate -0.6 %; 95 % CI: -11.3-10.1 %, p=0.91). However, a substantial difference was evident between diagnostic errors after correct (20.6 %, 33/160) and incorrect (57.5 %, 92/160) working diagnoses presented (point estimate: 36.9 %; 95 % CI: 27.0-46.8 %, p<0.001). Diagnostic momentum accounted for 52 % (48/92) of errors under incorrect diagnoses.

Discussion: While the timing of working diagnosis disclosure did not significantly alter diagnostic accuracy during ED handoffs, exposure to incorrect diagnoses markedly increased error rates. These findings underscore the imperative to refine diagnostic skills and reconsider ED handoff protocols to mitigate cognitive biases and optimize patient care outcomes.