Impact of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Diseases of the Colon & Rectum Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1097/DCR.0000000000003418
Zachary Bunjo, Luke Traeger, Ishraq Murshed, Sergei Bedrikovetski, Nagendra N Dudi-Venkata, Christopher Dobbins, Tarik Sammour
{"title":"Impact of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Zachary Bunjo, Luke Traeger, Ishraq Murshed, Sergei Bedrikovetski, Nagendra N Dudi-Venkata, Christopher Dobbins, Tarik Sammour","doi":"10.1097/DCR.0000000000003418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal emergencies represent a large proportion of acute general surgical workload and carry significant mortality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Identify the influence of surgeon specialization on mortality and other outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases were performed for studies published from January 1, 1990, to August 27, 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Studies investigating outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery for adults, comparing colorectal against noncolorectal surgeon specialization, were included. Exclusion criteria were: 1) publications studying primarily pediatric populations; 2) studies incorporating patients who had undergone surgery before 1990; and 3) studies only published in abstract form or non-English language.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were rates of anastomotic leak, reintervention, primary anastomosis, and laparoscopic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 7676 studies identified, 155 were selected for full-text review and 21 were included for quantitative analysis. Eleven studies showed improved 30-day (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60-0.68; p < 0.0001) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89; p = 0.007) with colorectal specialization. There was a significantly higher rate of primary anastomosis (OR 2.95; 95% CI, 2.02-4.31; p < 0.0001) and use of laparoscopic surgery (OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.42-4.00; p = 0.001) among specialized colorectal surgeons. Specialization was also associated with a significant reduction in any stoma formation (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.98; p = 0.04). No significant difference was observed for anastomotic leak (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.45-1.07; p = 0.10) or reintervention rates (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.55-1.10; p = 0.16).</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>Heterogeneity exists within the included patient populations and definitions of colorectal specialization observed in different countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency colorectal surgery undertaken by specialized colorectal surgeons is associated with significantly improved postoperative mortality, lower rates of stoma formation, and increased rates of primary anastomosis and minimally invasive surgery.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration: </strong>CRD42022300541.</p>","PeriodicalId":11299,"journal":{"name":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","volume":" ","pages":"14-30"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diseases of the Colon & Rectum","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000003418","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Colorectal emergencies represent a large proportion of acute general surgical workload and carry significant mortality.

Objective: Identify the influence of surgeon specialization on mortality and other outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery.

Data sources: Systematic searches of Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane electronic databases were performed for studies published from January 1, 1990, to August 27, 2023.

Study selection: Studies investigating outcomes in emergency colorectal surgery for adults, comparing colorectal against noncolorectal surgeon specialization, were included. Exclusion criteria were: 1) publications studying primarily pediatric populations; 2) studies incorporating patients who had undergone surgery before 1990; and 3) studies only published in abstract form or non-English language.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were rates of anastomotic leak, reintervention, primary anastomosis, and laparoscopic approach.

Results: Of 7676 studies identified, 155 were selected for full-text review and 21 were included for quantitative analysis. Eleven studies showed improved 30-day (OR 0.64; 95% CI, 0.60-0.68; p < 0.0001) and in-hospital mortality (OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89; p = 0.007) with colorectal specialization. There was a significantly higher rate of primary anastomosis (OR 2.95; 95% CI, 2.02-4.31; p < 0.0001) and use of laparoscopic surgery (OR 2.38; 95% CI, 1.42-4.00; p = 0.001) among specialized colorectal surgeons. Specialization was also associated with a significant reduction in any stoma formation (OR 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.98; p = 0.04). No significant difference was observed for anastomotic leak (OR 0.70; 95% CI, 0.45-1.07; p = 0.10) or reintervention rates (OR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.55-1.10; p = 0.16).

Limitations: Heterogeneity exists within the included patient populations and definitions of colorectal specialization observed in different countries.

Conclusions: Emergency colorectal surgery undertaken by specialized colorectal surgeons is associated with significantly improved postoperative mortality, lower rates of stoma formation, and increased rates of primary anastomosis and minimally invasive surgery.

Prospero registration: CRD42022300541.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
外科医生专业化对急诊结直肠手术结果的影响:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:结直肠急诊占急性普外科工作量的很大一部分,死亡率很高:结直肠急诊在急诊普外科工作量中占很大比例,死亡率也很高:确定外科医生专业化对急诊结直肠手术死亡率和其他结果的影响:对Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid EMBASE和Cochrane电子数据库中1990年1月1日至2023年8月27日发表的研究进行系统检索:研究选择:纳入调查成人急诊结直肠手术结果的研究,比较结直肠外科医生与非结直肠外科医生的专业。排除标准包括(1)主要研究儿科人群的出版物;(2)纳入1990年之前接受手术的患者的研究;(3)仅以摘要形式发表或非英语语言的研究:主要结果:30 天死亡率和住院死亡率为主要结果。次要结果为吻合口渗漏率、再次手术率、初次吻合率和腹腔镜手术率:结果:在已确定的 7676 项研究中,有 155 项被选中进行全文综述,21 项被纳入进行定量分析。有 11 项研究显示,结直肠专科治疗可提高 30 天死亡率(OR 0.64,95% CI 0.60-0.68,p < 0.0001)和住院死亡率(OR 0.66,95% CI 0.49-0.89,p = 0.007)。专科结直肠外科医生的初次吻合率(OR 2.95,95% CI 2.02-4.31,p < 0.0001)和腹腔镜手术使用率(OR 2.38,95% CI 1.42-4.00,p = 0.001)明显更高。专业化也与造口的显著减少有关(OR 0.52,95% CI 0.28-0.98,p = 0.04)。吻合口漏(OR 0.70,95% CI 0.45-1.07,p = 0.10)或再介入率(OR 0.78,95% CI 0.55-1.10,p = 0.16)方面无明显差异:局限性:纳入的患者群体和不同国家的结直肠专科定义存在差异:由专业结直肠外科医生进行急诊结直肠手术可显著改善术后死亡率,降低造口形成率,提高初次吻合率和微创手术率:CRD42022300541。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
572
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum (DCR) is the official journal of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) dedicated to advancing the knowledge of intestinal disorders by providing a forum for communication amongst their members. The journal features timely editorials, original contributions and technical notes.
期刊最新文献
Clip-and-Lift Retraction Technique During Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection. Jejunal Lymphatic and Vascular Anatomy Defines Surgical Principles for Treatment of Jejunal Tumors. Outreach - A World of Possibilities. Robotic Masterclass: Instrument Control During Total Mesorectal Excision. Area Deprivation, Fragmented Care, and Colectomy Case Acuity in the Veterans Health Administration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1