The impact of different dietary flavonoids on the risk of coronary heart disease in cancer patients and that on the prognosis of patients with cancer and coronary heart disease.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY European Journal of Cancer Prevention Pub Date : 2024-10-09 DOI:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000928
Jingjing Zhu, Tao Xu, Xu Cao, Di Pan, Zhiyuan Yao, Yuqi Li, Hongmei Wang, Zhengxiang Han
{"title":"The impact of different dietary flavonoids on the risk of coronary heart disease in cancer patients and that on the prognosis of patients with cancer and coronary heart disease.","authors":"Jingjing Zhu, Tao Xu, Xu Cao, Di Pan, Zhiyuan Yao, Yuqi Li, Hongmei Wang, Zhengxiang Han","doi":"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to explore the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in cancer patients who consume different flavonoids, and the impact of flavonoids on the prognosis of cancer patients with CHD. We extracted dietary flavonoids data on 1454 patients diagnosed with cancer from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between the intake of flavonoids and the risk of CHD. Cox proportional hazard model was used to explore the impact of flavonoids intake on prognosis in 148 patients with cancer and CHD. Malvidin intake increased the risk of CHD by 1% [odds ratio (OR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.02, P < 0.05] in cancer patients, while epicatechin and isorhamnetin reduced the risk of CHD by 3% (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-1.00, P < 0.05) and 15% (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-1.00, P < 0.05), respectively. Adjusted by age, sex, and race, malvidin intake increased the risk of CHD in cancer patients by 1% (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02, P < 0.05), isorhamnetin decreased the risk by 15% (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-1.00, P < 0.05), and epicatechin showed no effect on the risk of CHD (P > 0.05). No flavonoids had impact on the prognosis of patients with cancer and CHD (P > 0.05). For patients with cancer, consuming malvidin increases the risk of CHD, while isorhamnetin reduces the risk. Consuming flavonoids has no impact on the prognosis of patients with cancer and CHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":11830,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) in cancer patients who consume different flavonoids, and the impact of flavonoids on the prognosis of cancer patients with CHD. We extracted dietary flavonoids data on 1454 patients diagnosed with cancer from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies. Logistic regression analysis was used to explore the relationship between the intake of flavonoids and the risk of CHD. Cox proportional hazard model was used to explore the impact of flavonoids intake on prognosis in 148 patients with cancer and CHD. Malvidin intake increased the risk of CHD by 1% [odds ratio (OR) = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-1.02, P < 0.05] in cancer patients, while epicatechin and isorhamnetin reduced the risk of CHD by 3% (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.94-1.00, P < 0.05) and 15% (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-1.00, P < 0.05), respectively. Adjusted by age, sex, and race, malvidin intake increased the risk of CHD in cancer patients by 1% (OR = 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02, P < 0.05), isorhamnetin decreased the risk by 15% (OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.72-1.00, P < 0.05), and epicatechin showed no effect on the risk of CHD (P > 0.05). No flavonoids had impact on the prognosis of patients with cancer and CHD (P > 0.05). For patients with cancer, consuming malvidin increases the risk of CHD, while isorhamnetin reduces the risk. Consuming flavonoids has no impact on the prognosis of patients with cancer and CHD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同膳食类黄酮对癌症患者冠心病风险的影响,以及对癌症和冠心病患者预后的影响。
本研究旨在探讨摄入不同类黄酮的癌症患者罹患冠心病(CHD)的风险,以及类黄酮对罹患冠心病的癌症患者预后的影响。我们从美国国家健康与营养调查和膳食研究食物与营养素数据库中提取了1454名确诊癌症患者的类黄酮膳食数据。采用逻辑回归分析探讨类黄酮摄入量与冠心病风险之间的关系。采用Cox比例危险模型探讨了类黄酮摄入量对148名癌症和心脏病患者预后的影响。摄入麦饭石黄酮会使癌症患者罹患冠心病的风险增加1%[几率比(OR)=1.01,95%置信区间(CI):1.00-1.02,P < 0.05],而表儿茶素和异鼠李素则会使罹患冠心病的风险分别降低3%(OR = 0.97,95% CI:0.94-1.00,P < 0.05)和15%(OR = 0.85,95% CI:0.72-1.00,P < 0.05)。经年龄、性别和种族调整后,摄入麦饭石黄酮会使癌症患者罹患冠心病的风险增加1%(OR = 1.01,95% CI:1.00-1.02,P < 0.05),异鼠李素会使罹患冠心病的风险降低15%(OR = 0.85,95% CI:0.72-1.00,P < 0.05),而表儿茶素对罹患冠心病的风险没有影响(P > 0.05)。没有一种类黄酮对癌症和心脏病患者的预后有影响(P > 0.05)。对于癌症患者来说,摄入麦饭石黄酮会增加患心脏病的风险,而摄入异鼠李素则会降低患心脏病的风险。食用类黄酮对癌症和心脏病患者的预后没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Cancer Prevention aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer prevention and to stimulate new ideas and innovations. The Journal has a wide-ranging scope, covering such aspects as descriptive and metabolic epidemiology, histopathology, genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, clinical medicine, intervention trials and public education, basic laboratory studies and special group studies. Although affiliated to a European organization, the journal addresses issues of international importance.
期刊最新文献
Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and prognostic factors of patients with second primary triple-negative breast cancer: a study based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Marital status as an independent prognostic factor for survival in women with vaginal cancer: evidence from the SEER database analysis. Use of stool DNA for colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Long-term trends in the burden of breast cancer in China over three decades: a joinpoint regression and age-period-cohort analysis based on Global Burden of Disease 2021. Cryoablation of early breast cancer: the challenge towards de-escalation of surgical treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1