Trends in NHANES Biomonitored Exposures in California and the United States following Enactment of California's Proposition 65.

IF 10.1 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Health Perspectives Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1289/EHP13956
Kristin E Knox, Megan R Schwarzman, Ruthann A Rudel, Claudia Polsky, Robin E Dodson
{"title":"Trends in NHANES Biomonitored Exposures in California and the United States following Enactment of California's Proposition 65.","authors":"Kristin E Knox, Megan R Schwarzman, Ruthann A Rudel, Claudia Polsky, Robin E Dodson","doi":"10.1289/EHP13956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prevalence of toxic chemicals in US commerce has prompted some states to adopt laws to reduce exposure. One with broad reach is California's Proposition 65 (Prop 65), which established a list of chemicals that cause cancer, developmental harm, or reproductive toxicity. The law is intended to discourage businesses from using these chemicals and to minimize consumer exposure. However, a key question remains unanswered: Has Prop 65 reduced population-level exposure to the listed chemicals?</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We used national biomonitoring data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate the impact of Prop 65 on population-level exposures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated changes in blood and urine concentrations of 37 chemicals (including phthalates, phenols, VOCs, metals, PAHs, and PFAS), among US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants in relation to the time of chemicals' Prop 65 listing. Of these, 11 were listed prior to, 11 during, and 4 after the biomonitoring period. The remaining 11 were not listed but were closely related to a Prop 65-listed chemical. Where biomonitoring data were available from before and after the date of Prop 65 listing, we estimated the change in concentrations over time for Californians compared with non-Californians, using a difference-in-differences model. We used quantile regression to estimate changes in exposure over time, as well as differences between Californians and non-Californians at the 25th, 75th, and 95th percentiles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that concentrations of biomonitored chemicals generally declined nationwide over time irrespective of their inclusion on the Prop 65 list. Median bisphenol A (BPA) concentrations decreased 15% after BPA's listing on Prop 65, whereas concentrations of the nonlisted but closely related bisphenol S (BPS) increased 20% over this same period, suggesting chemical substitution. Californians generally had lower levels of biomonitored chemicals than the rest of the US population.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings suggest that increased scientific and regulatory attention, as well as public awareness of the harms of Prop 65-listed chemicals, prompted changes in product formulations that reduced exposure to those chemicals nationwide. Trends in bisphenols and several phthalates suggest that manufacturers replaced some listed chemicals with closely related but unlisted chemicals, increasing exposure to the substitutes. Our findings have implications for the design of policies to reduce toxic exposures, biomonitoring programs to inform policy interventions, and future research into the regulatory and market forces that affect chemical exposure. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13956.</p>","PeriodicalId":11862,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Health Perspectives","volume":"132 10","pages":"107007"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493239/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Health Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13956","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of toxic chemicals in US commerce has prompted some states to adopt laws to reduce exposure. One with broad reach is California's Proposition 65 (Prop 65), which established a list of chemicals that cause cancer, developmental harm, or reproductive toxicity. The law is intended to discourage businesses from using these chemicals and to minimize consumer exposure. However, a key question remains unanswered: Has Prop 65 reduced population-level exposure to the listed chemicals?

Objective: We used national biomonitoring data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to evaluate the impact of Prop 65 on population-level exposures.

Methods: We evaluated changes in blood and urine concentrations of 37 chemicals (including phthalates, phenols, VOCs, metals, PAHs, and PFAS), among US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) participants in relation to the time of chemicals' Prop 65 listing. Of these, 11 were listed prior to, 11 during, and 4 after the biomonitoring period. The remaining 11 were not listed but were closely related to a Prop 65-listed chemical. Where biomonitoring data were available from before and after the date of Prop 65 listing, we estimated the change in concentrations over time for Californians compared with non-Californians, using a difference-in-differences model. We used quantile regression to estimate changes in exposure over time, as well as differences between Californians and non-Californians at the 25th, 75th, and 95th percentiles.

Results: We found that concentrations of biomonitored chemicals generally declined nationwide over time irrespective of their inclusion on the Prop 65 list. Median bisphenol A (BPA) concentrations decreased 15% after BPA's listing on Prop 65, whereas concentrations of the nonlisted but closely related bisphenol S (BPS) increased 20% over this same period, suggesting chemical substitution. Californians generally had lower levels of biomonitored chemicals than the rest of the US population.

Discussion: Our findings suggest that increased scientific and regulatory attention, as well as public awareness of the harms of Prop 65-listed chemicals, prompted changes in product formulations that reduced exposure to those chemicals nationwide. Trends in bisphenols and several phthalates suggest that manufacturers replaced some listed chemicals with closely related but unlisted chemicals, increasing exposure to the substitutes. Our findings have implications for the design of policies to reduce toxic exposures, biomonitoring programs to inform policy interventions, and future research into the regulatory and market forces that affect chemical exposure. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13956.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加州 65 号提案颁布后加州和美国 NHANES 生物监测暴露趋势。
背景:有毒化学品在美国商业中的普遍存在促使一些州通过法律来减少化学品的接触。加利福尼亚州的第 65 号提案(Proposition 65)就是一项影响广泛的法律,该提案列出了一份可致癌、对发育有害或具有生殖毒性的化学品清单。该法律旨在阻止企业使用这些化学品,并最大限度地减少消费者的接触。然而,一个关键问题仍然没有答案:提案 65 是否减少了人群对所列化学品的暴露?我们利用疾病控制和预防中心 (CDC) 提供的全国生物监测数据,评估提案 65 对人群暴露的影响:我们评估了美国国家健康与营养调查 (NHANES) 参与者血液和尿液中 37 种化学品(包括邻苯二甲酸盐、酚类、挥发性有机化合物、金属、多环芳烃和全氟辛烷磺酸)浓度的变化与 65 号提案列出化学品时间的关系。其中,11 种在生物监测期之前被列入,11 种在生物监测期期间被列入,4 种在生物监测期之后被列入。其余 11 种虽然未被列入名单,但与列入 65 号提案的化学品密切相关。在有 65 号提案上市日期前后的生物监测数据的情况下,我们使用差分模型估算了加州人与非加州人的浓度随时间的变化。我们使用量子回归法估算了暴露量随时间的变化,以及加州人与非加州人在第 25、75 和 95 百分位数上的差异:我们发现,随着时间的推移,全国范围内生物监测化学品的浓度普遍下降,与这些化学品是否被列入 65 号提案清单无关。双酚 A (BPA) 的浓度中位数在双酚 A 被列入 65 号提案后下降了 15%,而未被列入提案但与之密切相关的双酚 S (BPS) 的浓度在同一时期上升了 20%,这表明存在化学替代现象。加利福尼亚人的生物监测化学品水平普遍低于美国其他地区的人口:讨论:我们的研究结果表明,科学和监管部门的日益关注以及公众对提案 65 所列化学品危害的认识,促使产品配方发生变化,从而在全国范围内减少了对这些化学品的接触。双酚和几种邻苯二甲酸盐的趋势表明,制造商用密切相关但未列入清单的化学品替代了某些列入清单的化学品,从而增加了对替代品的接触。我们的研究结果对减少有毒物质暴露的政策设计、为政策干预提供信息的生物监测计划以及未来对影响化学品暴露的监管和市场力量的研究都有意义。https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP13956。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Health Perspectives
Environmental Health Perspectives 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
388
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Health Perspectives (EHP) is a monthly peer-reviewed journal supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health under the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Its mission is to facilitate discussions on the connections between the environment and human health by publishing top-notch research and news. EHP ranks third in Public, Environmental, and Occupational Health, fourth in Toxicology, and fifth in Environmental Sciences.
期刊最新文献
Gut Check: Microbiota and Obesity in Mice Exposed to Polystyrene Microspheres. A Prospective Analysis of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances from Early Pregnancy to Delivery in the Atlanta African American Maternal-Child Cohort. Association between Diet-Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Mortality among Japanese Adults: The Japan Collaborative Cohort Study. Madagascar's Plague: One Health Research Aims to Slow Its Spread. Organophosphorus Flame Retardants and Metabolic Disruption: An in Silico, in Vitro, and in Vivo Study Focusing on Adiponectin Receptors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1