Management of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis: a probability-based approach and recent literature appraisal : Update of the Swiss national guideline of the Swiss Society of Neonatology and the Pediatric Infectious Disease Group Switzerland.
Martin Stocker, Flavia Rosa-Mangeret, Philipp K A Agyeman, Jane McDougall, Christoph Berger, Eric Giannoni
{"title":"Management of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis: a probability-based approach and recent literature appraisal : Update of the Swiss national guideline of the Swiss Society of Neonatology and the Pediatric Infectious Disease Group Switzerland.","authors":"Martin Stocker, Flavia Rosa-Mangeret, Philipp K A Agyeman, Jane McDougall, Christoph Berger, Eric Giannoni","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05811-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Switzerland and other high-income countries, one out of 3000 to 5000 term and late preterm neonates develops early onset sepsis (EOS) associated with a mortality of around 3%, while incidence and mortality of EOS in very preterm infants are substantially higher. Exposure to antibiotics for suspected EOS is disproportionally high compared to the incidence of EOS with consequences for future health and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A safe reduction of unnecessary antibiotic treatment has to be a major goal of new management strategies and guidelines. Antibiotics should be administered immediately in situations with clinical signs of septic shock. Group B streptococcus (GBS) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) are the leading pathogens of EOS. Amoxicillin combined with an aminoglycoside remains the first choice for empirical treatment. Serial physical examinations are recommended for all neonates with risk factors for EOS. Neonates without any clinical signs suggestive of EOS should not be treated with antibiotics. In Switzerland, we do not recommend the use of the EOS calculator, a risk stratification tool, due to its unclear impact in a population with an observed antibiotic exposure below 3%. Not all neonates with respiratory distress should be empirically treated with antibiotics. Isolated tachypnea or respiratory distress starting immediately after delivery by elective caesarean section or a clearly assessed alternative explanation than EOS for clinical signs may point towards a low probability of sepsis. On the other hand, unexplained prematurity with risk factors has an inherent higher risk of EOS. Before the start of antibiotic therapy, blood cultures should be drawn with a minimum volume of 1 ml in a single aerobic blood culture bottle. This standard procedure allows antibiotics to be stopped after 24 to 36 h if no pathogen is detected in blood cultures. Current data do not support the use of PCR-based pathogen detection in blood as a standard method. Lumbar puncture is recommended in blood culture-proven EOS, critical illness, or in the presence of neurological symptoms such as seizures or altered consciousness. The accuracy of a single biomarker measurement to distinguish inflammation from infection is low in neonates. Therefore, biomarker guidance is not a standard part of decision-making regarding the start or stop of antibiotic therapy but may be used as part of an algorithm and after appropriate education of health care teams. Every newborn started on antibiotics should be assessed for organ dysfunction with prompt initiation of respiratory and hemodynamic support if needed. An elevated lactate may be a sign of poor perfusion and requires a comprehensive assessment of the clinical condition. Interventions to restore perfusion include fluid boli with crystalloids and catecholamines. Neonates in critical condition should be cared for in a specialized unit. In situations with a low probability of EOS, antibiotics should be stopped as early as possible within the first 24 h after the start of therapy. In cases with microbiologically proven EOS, reassessment and streamlining of antibiotic therapy in neonates is an important step to minimize AMR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> This guideline, developed through a critical review of the literature, facilitates a probability-based approach to the management of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis.</p><p><strong>What is known: </strong>• Neonatal exposure to antibiotics is disproportionally high compared with the incidence of early onset sepsis with implications for future health and antimicrobial resistance.</p><p><strong>What is new: </strong>• A probability-based approach may facilitate a more balanced management of neonatal sepsis and antibiotic stewardship.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"5517-5529"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11527939/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05811-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In Switzerland and other high-income countries, one out of 3000 to 5000 term and late preterm neonates develops early onset sepsis (EOS) associated with a mortality of around 3%, while incidence and mortality of EOS in very preterm infants are substantially higher. Exposure to antibiotics for suspected EOS is disproportionally high compared to the incidence of EOS with consequences for future health and antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A safe reduction of unnecessary antibiotic treatment has to be a major goal of new management strategies and guidelines. Antibiotics should be administered immediately in situations with clinical signs of septic shock. Group B streptococcus (GBS) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) are the leading pathogens of EOS. Amoxicillin combined with an aminoglycoside remains the first choice for empirical treatment. Serial physical examinations are recommended for all neonates with risk factors for EOS. Neonates without any clinical signs suggestive of EOS should not be treated with antibiotics. In Switzerland, we do not recommend the use of the EOS calculator, a risk stratification tool, due to its unclear impact in a population with an observed antibiotic exposure below 3%. Not all neonates with respiratory distress should be empirically treated with antibiotics. Isolated tachypnea or respiratory distress starting immediately after delivery by elective caesarean section or a clearly assessed alternative explanation than EOS for clinical signs may point towards a low probability of sepsis. On the other hand, unexplained prematurity with risk factors has an inherent higher risk of EOS. Before the start of antibiotic therapy, blood cultures should be drawn with a minimum volume of 1 ml in a single aerobic blood culture bottle. This standard procedure allows antibiotics to be stopped after 24 to 36 h if no pathogen is detected in blood cultures. Current data do not support the use of PCR-based pathogen detection in blood as a standard method. Lumbar puncture is recommended in blood culture-proven EOS, critical illness, or in the presence of neurological symptoms such as seizures or altered consciousness. The accuracy of a single biomarker measurement to distinguish inflammation from infection is low in neonates. Therefore, biomarker guidance is not a standard part of decision-making regarding the start or stop of antibiotic therapy but may be used as part of an algorithm and after appropriate education of health care teams. Every newborn started on antibiotics should be assessed for organ dysfunction with prompt initiation of respiratory and hemodynamic support if needed. An elevated lactate may be a sign of poor perfusion and requires a comprehensive assessment of the clinical condition. Interventions to restore perfusion include fluid boli with crystalloids and catecholamines. Neonates in critical condition should be cared for in a specialized unit. In situations with a low probability of EOS, antibiotics should be stopped as early as possible within the first 24 h after the start of therapy. In cases with microbiologically proven EOS, reassessment and streamlining of antibiotic therapy in neonates is an important step to minimize AMR.
Conclusion: This guideline, developed through a critical review of the literature, facilitates a probability-based approach to the management of neonates at risk of early onset sepsis.
What is known: • Neonatal exposure to antibiotics is disproportionally high compared with the incidence of early onset sepsis with implications for future health and antimicrobial resistance.
What is new: • A probability-based approach may facilitate a more balanced management of neonatal sepsis and antibiotic stewardship.
在瑞士和其他高收入国家,每 3000 到 5000 名足月儿和晚期早产儿中就有一名新生儿患上早发性败血症(EOS),死亡率约为 3%,而极早产儿的 EOS 发病率和死亡率则要高得多。与 EOS 的发病率相比,因疑似 EOS 而使用抗生素的比例过高,这将对未来健康和抗菌素耐药性 (AMR) 造成影响。安全减少不必要的抗生素治疗必须成为新管理策略和指南的主要目标。在出现脓毒性休克临床症状时,应立即使用抗生素。B 组链球菌(GBS)和大肠杆菌(E. coli)是 EOS 的主要病原体。阿莫西林联合氨基糖苷类药物仍是经验性治疗的首选。建议对所有有 EOS 危险因素的新生儿进行连续体检。没有任何临床症状提示 EOS 的新生儿不应使用抗生素治疗。在瑞士,我们不建议使用 EOS 计算器这一风险分层工具,因为在抗生素暴露率低于 3% 的人群中,该工具的作用尚不明确。并非所有出现呼吸窘迫的新生儿都应使用抗生素进行经验性治疗。通过选择性剖腹产分娩后立即出现的孤立性呼吸过速或呼吸窘迫,或临床症状中除 EOS 外有明确评估的其他解释,都可能表明患败血症的可能性较低。另一方面,有风险因素的不明原因早产儿发生 EOS 的风险较高。在开始抗生素治疗前,应在单个需氧血培养瓶中抽取至少 1 毫升的血培养液。如果在血液培养物中未检测到病原体,则可在 24 至 36 小时后停止使用抗生素。目前的数据并不支持将基于 PCR 的血液病原体检测作为标准方法。建议在血培养证实为 EOS、病情危重或出现癫痫发作或意识改变等神经系统症状时进行腰椎穿刺。在新生儿中,单一生物标记物测量区分炎症和感染的准确性较低。因此,生物标志物指导并不是开始或停止抗生素治疗决策的标准组成部分,但可作为算法的一部分,并在对医疗团队进行适当教育后使用。每个开始使用抗生素的新生儿都应接受器官功能障碍评估,必要时及时启动呼吸和血液动力学支持。乳酸升高可能是灌注不良的迹象,需要对临床状况进行全面评估。恢复血流灌注的干预措施包括使用晶体液和儿茶酚胺。情况危急的新生儿应在专门的监护室接受护理。在 EOS 可能性较低的情况下,应在开始治疗后的 24 小时内尽早停用抗生素。对于经微生物学证实存在 EOS 的病例,重新评估和简化新生儿的抗生素治疗是将 AMR 降到最低的重要步骤: 本指南是通过对文献的严格审查而制定的,有助于采用基于概率的方法来管理有早发性败血症风险的新生儿:- 已知:与早发败血症的发病率相比,新生儿接触抗生素的比例过高,这对未来健康和抗菌素耐药性都有影响:- 新内容:基于概率的方法有助于对新生儿败血症和抗生素管理进行更平衡的管理。
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics.
EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned.
The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics.
EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate.
EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.