Examining health literacy in the Danish general population: a cross-sectional study on the associations between individual factors and healthcare-seeking behaviour.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH European Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2024-10-14 DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckae150
Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Isabella Pernille Raasthøj, Sofie Amalie Seldorf, Sanne Rasmussen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam
{"title":"Examining health literacy in the Danish general population: a cross-sectional study on the associations between individual factors and healthcare-seeking behaviour.","authors":"Lisa Maria Sele Sætre, Dorte Ejg Jarbøl, Isabella Pernille Raasthøj, Sofie Amalie Seldorf, Sanne Rasmussen, Kirubakaran Balasubramaniam","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckae150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Knowledge about health literacy challenges among the general population is valuable for initiatives targeting social inequity in health. We investigated health literacy in various population groups and the impact of healthcare-seeking behaviour by analysing the associations between (i) lifestyle, socioeconomics, self-rated health, chronic disease, and health literacy and (ii) symptom burden, contact to general practitioner (GP), and health literacy. In total, 27 488 individuals participated in a population-based survey. Questionnaire data comprised information about symptoms, GP contact, lifestyle, self-rated health, chronic disease, and four aspects of health literacy: feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers, having sufficient information about health, having social support for health, and being able to actively engage with healthcare providers. Socioeconomics were obtained from registers. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression models were applied. Individuals who smoked, lived alone, had different ethnicity than Danish, and low self-rated health had more health literacy challenges reflected in lower scores for all aspects of health literacy. Individuals with high symptom burden and those who had presented a high absolute number of symptoms to their GP were less likely to have sufficient information about health and be able to actively engage, whereas individuals reporting GP contact with a high relative percentage of their symptoms were more likely to feel understood and supported by healthcare providers. Health literacy challenges are related to healthcare-seeking behaviour and several individual factors. To address social inequity in health and society, interventions aimed at both the individual and community-based health literacy are essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae150","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Knowledge about health literacy challenges among the general population is valuable for initiatives targeting social inequity in health. We investigated health literacy in various population groups and the impact of healthcare-seeking behaviour by analysing the associations between (i) lifestyle, socioeconomics, self-rated health, chronic disease, and health literacy and (ii) symptom burden, contact to general practitioner (GP), and health literacy. In total, 27 488 individuals participated in a population-based survey. Questionnaire data comprised information about symptoms, GP contact, lifestyle, self-rated health, chronic disease, and four aspects of health literacy: feeling understood and supported by healthcare providers, having sufficient information about health, having social support for health, and being able to actively engage with healthcare providers. Socioeconomics were obtained from registers. Descriptive statistics and multivariable linear regression models were applied. Individuals who smoked, lived alone, had different ethnicity than Danish, and low self-rated health had more health literacy challenges reflected in lower scores for all aspects of health literacy. Individuals with high symptom burden and those who had presented a high absolute number of symptoms to their GP were less likely to have sufficient information about health and be able to actively engage, whereas individuals reporting GP contact with a high relative percentage of their symptoms were more likely to feel understood and supported by healthcare providers. Health literacy challenges are related to healthcare-seeking behaviour and several individual factors. To address social inequity in health and society, interventions aimed at both the individual and community-based health literacy are essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丹麦普通人群健康素养调查:关于个人因素与就医行为之间关系的横断面研究。
了解普通人群在健康素养方面所面临的挑战,对于针对社会健康不平等问题采取相应措施非常有价值。我们通过分析(i)生活方式、社会经济、自我健康评价、慢性病和健康素养之间的关联,以及(ii)症状负担、与全科医生(GP)的联系和健康素养之间的关联,调查了不同人群的健康素养以及对医疗行为的影响。共有 27 488 人参与了一项基于人口的调查。问卷数据包括症状、与全科医生的联系、生活方式、自我健康评价、慢性病以及健康素养四个方面的信息:感受到医疗服务提供者的理解和支持、拥有足够的健康信息、在健康方面获得社会支持以及能够积极与医疗服务提供者联系。社会经济情况来自登记册。采用了描述性统计和多变量线性回归模型。吸烟、独居、种族与丹麦人不同以及自我健康评价较低的人在健康素养方面面临更多挑战,这反映在他们在健康素养各方面的得分都较低。症状负担重的人和向全科医生反映症状绝对数高的人不太可能获得足够的健康信息,也不太可能积极地参与,而向全科医生反映症状相对比例高的人则更有可能感受到医疗服务提供者的理解和支持。健康素养方面的挑战与寻求医疗保健的行为和一些个人因素有关。要解决健康和社会中的社会不平等问题,针对个人和社区健康素养的干预措施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
期刊最新文献
Support for a ban on characterizing flavours in cigarettes in the UK: a longitudinal online survey. Prospective relationship between family screen time rules, obesogenic behaviours, and childhood obesity. Association of unemployment and increased depressive symptoms with all-cause mortality: follow-up study of a cardiovascular prevention programme. Correction. The impact of reminders on representativeness and survey estimates among web-mode invited in the Danish National Health Survey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1