Comparison of adverse events of poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors in patients with ovarian cancer using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2024-10-23 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2418333
Toru Ogura, Chihiro Shiraishi
{"title":"Comparison of adverse events of poly adenosine diphosphate ribose polymerase inhibitors in patients with ovarian cancer using the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System.","authors":"Toru Ogura, Chihiro Shiraishi","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2418333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib are the three primary poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors that are currently available in the market. Previous studies indicate different incidences of adverse events based on the PARP inhibitor or country.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>This study used data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System collected between January 2018 and December 2023. The data analyzed in this study involved patients receiving PARP inhibitors for treating ovarian cancer. A comparative analysis of the three PARP inhibitors was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the adjusted ROR (aROR) controlling for patient background differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The aROR for niraparib was significant at > 1.000, including platelet count decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (<i>p</i> < 0.001) when olaparib was set as the reference. Conversely, the aROR for niraparib was significant at < 1.000, including anemia (<i>p</i> < 0.001). Additionally, significant differences were observed in various adverse events for rucaparib. Moreover, significant differences were observed when comparing between countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that the types of adverse events may vary by PARP inhibitor and by country. These results will be beneficial in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2418333","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib are the three primary poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors that are currently available in the market. Previous studies indicate different incidences of adverse events based on the PARP inhibitor or country.

Research design and methods: This study used data from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System collected between January 2018 and December 2023. The data analyzed in this study involved patients receiving PARP inhibitors for treating ovarian cancer. A comparative analysis of the three PARP inhibitors was conducted using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and the adjusted ROR (aROR) controlling for patient background differences.

Results: The aROR for niraparib was significant at > 1.000, including platelet count decreased (p < 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001) when olaparib was set as the reference. Conversely, the aROR for niraparib was significant at < 1.000, including anemia (p < 0.001). Additionally, significant differences were observed in various adverse events for rucaparib. Moreover, significant differences were observed when comparing between countries.

Conclusions: This study indicates that the types of adverse events may vary by PARP inhibitor and by country. These results will be beneficial in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统对卵巢癌患者使用多聚腺苷二磷酸核糖聚合酶抑制剂的不良事件进行比较。
背景:奥拉帕利(Olaparib)、尼拉帕利(niraparib)和鲁卡帕利(rucaparib)是目前市场上三种主要的多(腺苷二磷酸核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂。以往的研究表明,PARP抑制剂或国家不同,不良事件的发生率也不同:本研究使用的数据来自美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统,收集时间为 2018 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月。本研究分析的数据涉及接受PARP抑制剂治疗卵巢癌的患者。使用报告几率(ROR)和控制患者背景差异的调整ROR(aROR)对三种PARP抑制剂进行了比较分析:结果:尼拉帕利的aROR大于1.000,包括血小板计数下降(p p p 结论:尼拉帕利的aROR显著大于1.000:这项研究表明,不同 PARP 抑制剂和不同国家的不良事件类型可能有所不同。这些结果将有助于临床实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Preserving residual kidney function in persons on peritoneal dialysis: the role of pharmacotherapy. Examining the safety of belimumab, especially in children: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance data from the US FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database. Safety concerns of aztreonam: a real-world disproportionality analysis based on FDA adverse event reporting system. Pharmacovigilance insights into drug-induced cystitis: analysis of FDA data from 2004 to 2024. Increased reporting of accidental overdose with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists: a population-based study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1