首页 > 最新文献

Expert Opinion on Drug Safety最新文献

英文 中文
From black box to clear box: explainable AI for next-gen pharmacovigilance. 从黑箱到清箱:用于下一代药物警戒的可解释人工智能。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2026.2628822
Nirmala Suryadevara, Vishnu Priya, Sanjay Sharma

Introduction: Pharmacovigilance (PV) plays a vital role in post-marketing surveillance of drug safety; however, traditional methods are hindered by underreporting, data heterogeneity, and delayed signal detection. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been increasingly employed to overcome these shortcomings through automation, advanced pattern recognition, and multimodal fusion of patient data.

Areas covered: The regulatory acceptance of these systems rests on explainability, transparency, and auditability, which necessitate the inclusion of explainable AI (XAI) methods. This review thoroughly examines the international regulatory environment for AI in PV and suggests using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) to build regulatory trust. Research materials, including official guidelines and publications, were systematically sourced from authoritative regulatory websites in the US, Europe, and India, as well as from major academic databases such as Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and PubMed.

Expert guidance: The EU AI Act classifies PV algorithms as 'high-risk,' imposing strict requirements for human oversight and transparency, aligning with the FDA's GMLP and India's Responsible AI principles. The review emphasizes traceability and governance, recommending convergence with human oversight into a regulatory-fit XAI framework to maximize safety signal detection and foster international trust in AI-based decision-making.

{"title":"From black box to clear box: explainable AI for next-gen pharmacovigilance.","authors":"Nirmala Suryadevara, Vishnu Priya, Sanjay Sharma","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2026.2628822","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2026.2628822","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pharmacovigilance (PV) plays a vital role in post-marketing surveillance of drug safety; however, traditional methods are hindered by underreporting, data heterogeneity, and delayed signal detection. Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been increasingly employed to overcome these shortcomings through automation, advanced pattern recognition, and multimodal fusion of patient data.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The regulatory acceptance of these systems rests on explainability, transparency, and auditability, which necessitate the inclusion of explainable AI (XAI) methods. This review thoroughly examines the international regulatory environment for AI in PV and suggests using Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) to build regulatory trust. Research materials, including official guidelines and publications, were systematically sourced from authoritative regulatory websites in the US, Europe, and India, as well as from major academic databases such as Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and PubMed.</p><p><strong>Expert guidance: </strong>The EU AI Act classifies PV algorithms as 'high-risk,' imposing strict requirements for human oversight and transparency, aligning with the FDA's GMLP and India's Responsible AI principles. The review emphasizes traceability and governance, recommending convergence with human oversight into a regulatory-fit XAI framework to maximize safety signal detection and foster international trust in AI-based decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146124321","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Are the current safety measures for the treatment of depression with esketamine sufficient? 目前艾氯胺酮治疗抑郁症的安全措施是否足够?
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2026.2627184
Kyle Valentino, Kayla M Teopiz, Christine E Dri, Jennifer Swainson, Yang Jing Zheng, Roger S McIntyre
{"title":"Are the current safety measures for the treatment of depression with esketamine sufficient?","authors":"Kyle Valentino, Kayla M Teopiz, Christine E Dri, Jennifer Swainson, Yang Jing Zheng, Roger S McIntyre","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2026.2627184","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2026.2627184","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112643","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety and efficacy of hormonal therapies used to treat endometriosis in women suffering migraine. 用于治疗女性偏头痛子宫内膜异位症的激素疗法的安全性和有效性。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-02 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2026.2627190
Umberto Perrone, Fabio Barra, Giulio Evangelisti, Alberto Izzotti, Claudio Gustavino, Andrea Antonelli, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Simone Ferrero

Introduction: Hormonal therapy is the cornerstone of long-term endometriosis management, especially for women deferring surgery. In patients with comorbid migraine - a common, disabling condition - therapeutic choices must balance efficacy with neurological and vascular safety.

Areas covered: This review summarizes hormonal therapies for endometriosis with a focus on safety in migraineurs. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2025.

Expert opinion: Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) and progestins remain first-line options for treating endometriosis-related pain. CHCs are contraindicated in patients with migraine with aura because of the increased risk of ischemic stroke, while their prescription in migraine without aura should be individualized, considering also the fact that evidence in women with concomitant endometriosis is still limited. Progestins generally show better tolerability and may improve migraine outcomes, despite the occurrence of breakthrough bleeding or mood changes. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists are second-line options, providing effective pain control, although their effects on migraine are variable and headaches are a frequent adverse event. Add-back therapy is essential to mitigate hypoestrogenic sequelae, particularly about bone health. Overall, treatment should be individualized according to migraine subtype and vascular risk profile to ensure long-term safety, adherence, and therapeutic effectiveness.

激素治疗是长期子宫内膜异位症治疗的基石,特别是对推迟手术的妇女。对于合并症偏头痛患者——一种常见的致残性疾病——治疗选择必须在疗效与神经和血管安全性之间取得平衡。涵盖领域:本文综述了子宫内膜异位症的激素治疗,重点是偏头痛患者的安全性。使用MEDLINE, EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的文献检索,直至2025年3月。专家意见:联合激素避孕药(CHCs)和孕激素仍然是治疗子宫内膜异位症相关疼痛的一线选择。有先兆偏头痛患者禁用CHCs,因为缺血性卒中的风险增加,而无先兆偏头痛患者的处方应个体化,同时考虑到伴有子宫内膜异位症的女性的证据仍然有限。孕激素通常表现出更好的耐受性,并可能改善偏头痛的预后,尽管发生突破性出血或情绪变化。促性腺激素释放激素(GnRH)激动剂和拮抗剂是二线选择,提供有效的疼痛控制,尽管它们对偏头痛的影响是可变的,头痛是常见的不良事件。补充疗法对于减轻雌激素水平低下的后遗症,尤其是对骨骼健康的影响至关重要。总的来说,治疗应根据偏头痛亚型和血管风险概况进行个体化,以确保长期的安全性、依从性和治疗效果。
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of hormonal therapies used to treat endometriosis in women suffering migraine.","authors":"Umberto Perrone, Fabio Barra, Giulio Evangelisti, Alberto Izzotti, Claudio Gustavino, Andrea Antonelli, Umberto Leone Roberti Maggiore, Simone Ferrero","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2026.2627190","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2026.2627190","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Hormonal therapy is the cornerstone of long-term endometriosis management, especially for women deferring surgery. In patients with comorbid migraine - a common, disabling condition - therapeutic choices must balance efficacy with neurological and vascular safety.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review summarizes hormonal therapies for endometriosis with a focus on safety in migraineurs. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library up to March 2025.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) and progestins remain first-line options for treating endometriosis-related pain. CHCs are contraindicated in patients with migraine with aura because of the increased risk of ischemic stroke, while their prescription in migraine without aura should be individualized, considering also the fact that evidence in women with concomitant endometriosis is still limited. Progestins generally show better tolerability and may improve migraine outcomes, despite the occurrence of breakthrough bleeding or mood changes. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists and antagonists are second-line options, providing effective pain control, although their effects on migraine are variable and headaches are a frequent adverse event. Add-back therapy is essential to mitigate hypoestrogenic sequelae, particularly about bone health. Overall, treatment should be individualized according to migraine subtype and vascular risk profile to ensure long-term safety, adherence, and therapeutic effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146104393","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety assessment of tafamidis: a real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database. 他法米底的安全性评估:来自FAERS数据库的真实世界不良事件分析。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-13 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2438751
Min Chen, Yaping Huang, Chengjie Ke, Maohua Chen

Background: Tafamidis emerged as the first FDA-approved drug for treating termed amyloid fibrils. This study aims to analyze adverse events (AEs) related to tafamidis from the second quarter (Q2) of 2019 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2023 from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.

Research design and methods: The AE data related to tafamidis from 2019 Q2 to 2023 Q4 were collected and standardized. Various signal quantification techniques, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker, were employed for analysis.

Results: Among the 8742 AE reports with tafamidis as the primary suspected drug, 180 preferred terms of AEs spanning 27 different system organ classes were identified. Unique adverse events to tafamidis included renal and urinary disorders and ear and labyrinth disorders, with not mentioned in the official drug label. Additionally, uncommon but significantly strong AE signals, such as blood culture positive and acquired hemophilia, were observed. Common AEs with relatively high occurrence rates included death, off-label use, fall, hypoacusis, and dysphagia.

Conclusion: These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing the use of tafamidis and reducing potential side effects, thereby facilitating its safe use in clinical settings.

背景:Tafamidis是fda批准的首个治疗淀粉样蛋白原纤维的药物。本研究旨在从FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中分析2019年第二季度(Q2)至2023年第四季度(Q4)与他法米地相关的不良事件(ae)。研究设计与方法:收集2019年第二季度至2023年第四季度与他法米迪斯相关的声发射数据并进行标准化。采用报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器等多种信号量化技术进行分析。结果:在8742例以他法非地为主要疑似药物的AE报告中,共鉴定出180个AE首选术语,涵盖27个不同的系统器官类别。他法他底的独特不良事件包括肾脏和泌尿系统疾病以及耳朵和迷宫疾病,在官方药物标签中未提及。此外,还观察到罕见但明显强烈的AE信号,如血培养阳性和获得性血友病。发生率相对较高的常见不良事件包括死亡、说明书外用药、跌倒、听觉减退和吞咽困难。结论:这些发现为优化他法非底斯的使用和减少潜在的副作用提供了有价值的见解,从而促进了其在临床环境中的安全使用。
{"title":"Safety assessment of tafamidis: a real-world adverse event analysis from the FAERS database.","authors":"Min Chen, Yaping Huang, Chengjie Ke, Maohua Chen","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438751","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438751","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tafamidis emerged as the first FDA-approved drug for treating termed amyloid fibrils. This study aims to analyze adverse events (AEs) related to tafamidis from the second quarter (Q2) of 2019 to the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2023 from the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The AE data related to tafamidis from 2019 Q2 to 2023 Q4 were collected and standardized. Various signal quantification techniques, including reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), Bayesian confidence propagation neural network, and multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker, were employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 8742 AE reports with tafamidis as the primary suspected drug, 180 preferred terms of AEs spanning 27 different system organ classes were identified. Unique adverse events to tafamidis included renal and urinary disorders and ear and labyrinth disorders, with not mentioned in the official drug label. Additionally, uncommon but significantly strong AE signals, such as blood culture positive and acquired hemophilia, were observed. Common AEs with relatively high occurrence rates included death, off-label use, fall, hypoacusis, and dysphagia.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings offer valuable insights for optimizing the use of tafamidis and reducing potential side effects, thereby facilitating its safe use in clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"401-409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142785081","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Drug-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation: insights from FAERS database analysis. 药物诱导的乙型肝炎病毒再激活:来自FAERS数据库分析的见解。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2438752
Genshan Zhang, Hanpeng Yan, Haokun Zhang, Lin Zhu, Jie Fu

Background: Reactivation of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) induced by drugs is a commonly overlooked but clinically significant complication, posing risks of treatment interruptions, hepatitis exacerbation, liver failure, and even mortality.

Methods: Disproportionality analyses were conducted on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database data spanning from January 2017 to December 2023 to detect drugs posing a risk of HBV reactivation (HBV-R). HBV-R cases were identified using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), and drug generic names were ascertained from the DrugBank database.

Results: A total of 2596 adverse event reports (AERs) were found to be related to drug-induced HBV-R.According to the disproportionality analysis, the top five drugs with the highest ROR and PRR were daklinza, vocabria, doxorubicin, sovaldi, and ribavirin. The top 40 drugs causing drug-induced HBV-R can be roughly divided into three categories: anti-tumor drugs, immunosuppressive drugs, and antiviral drugs. Among them, 23 drugs do not explicitly mention the risk of HBV-R in their drug instructions.

Conclusions: It was observed that some pharmaceuticals do not adequately address the risk of HBV-R in their drug documentation. These findings could assist healthcare providers in promptly recognizing drug-induced HBV-R.

背景:药物引起的乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)再激活是一种常被忽视但临床上重要的并发症,可能导致治疗中断、肝炎加重、肝功能衰竭甚至死亡。本研究旨在通过美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库确定可能导致HBV再激活(HBV- r)的潜在药物。方法:对2017年1月至2023年12月FAERS数据库数据进行歧化分析,检测存在HBV-R风险的药物。使用监管活动医学词典(MedDRA)确定HBV-R病例,并从DrugBank数据库确定药物通用名称。结果:共发现2596例与药物性HBV-R相关的不良事件报告(AERs)。其中,利妥昔单抗(231例)与HBV-R病例数最多。歧化率分析显示,ROR和PRR最高的前5位药物分别是达克林沙、沃布利亚、阿霉素、索伐地和利巴韦林。引起药物性HBV-R的前40种药物大致可分为三类:抗肿瘤药物、免疫抑制药物和抗病毒药物。其中,23种药物在其药物说明书中没有明确提及HBV-R的风险。结论:通过对FAERS数据库的分析,观察到一些药物在其药物文件中没有充分说明HBV-R的风险。这些发现可以帮助医疗保健提供者及时识别药物诱导的HBV-R。
{"title":"Drug-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation: insights from FAERS database analysis.","authors":"Genshan Zhang, Hanpeng Yan, Haokun Zhang, Lin Zhu, Jie Fu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438752","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438752","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reactivation of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) induced by drugs is a commonly overlooked but clinically significant complication, posing risks of treatment interruptions, hepatitis exacerbation, liver failure, and even mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Disproportionality analyses were conducted on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database data spanning from January 2017 to December 2023 to detect drugs posing a risk of HBV reactivation (HBV-R). HBV-R cases were identified using the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA), and drug generic names were ascertained from the DrugBank database.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2596 adverse event reports (AERs) were found to be related to drug-induced HBV-R.According to the disproportionality analysis, the top five drugs with the highest ROR and PRR were daklinza, vocabria, doxorubicin, sovaldi, and ribavirin. The top 40 drugs causing drug-induced HBV-R can be roughly divided into three categories: anti-tumor drugs, immunosuppressive drugs, and antiviral drugs. Among them, 23 drugs do not explicitly mention the risk of HBV-R in their drug instructions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It was observed that some pharmaceuticals do not adequately address the risk of HBV-R in their drug documentation. These findings could assist healthcare providers in promptly recognizing drug-induced HBV-R.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"337-342"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142779718","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Mining and analysis of adverse event signals of trastuzumab deruxtecan via real-world data of FDA adverse event reporting system database from 2019 to 2023. 利用FDA不良事件报告系统数据库2019 - 2023年真实数据挖掘分析曲妥珠单抗德鲁德替康不良事件信号。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2439510
Xiangyu Li, Fang Yang, Fuqun Zhou, Shenghong Zhu, Lingjing Yuan, Li Ma

Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a novel generation antibody-drug conjugate. However, current evidence for the safety of T-DXd is mostly limited to clinical trials. Therefore, we mine and analyze adverse events (AEs) caused by T-DXd based on the FAERS database and to provide reference for the safe use of drug in clinical practice.

Research design and methods: AEs associated with T-DXd were analyzed in the FAERS database from December 2019 to December 2023, and four disproportionality methods were combined to identify and evaluate reports.

Results: A total of 4651 AE reports of T-DXd as the 'primary suspect' were collected. The median time to onset of T-DXd-related AEs was 25 days. The proportion of serious AEs was 69.40%. Death (24.19%) accounted for the highest occurrence frequency of clinical serious outcomes. The top three AEs in both frequency and signal intensity were interstitial lung disease. We also found 12 novel AEs not recorded in the drug label.

Conclusion: This study indicate the importance of timely mining and updating information of adverse drug reactions. Drug evaluation should be performed well before using T-DXd, and timely intervention measures should be taken to avoid related injury caused by AEs.

背景:曲妥珠单抗德鲁西替康(T-DXd)是新一代抗体-药物偶联物。然而,目前关于T-DXd安全性的证据主要局限于临床试验。这导致无法及时更新药物不良事件(AE)。因此,我们基于FAERS数据库对T-DXd引起的声发射信号进行挖掘和分析,为临床安全用药和减少声发射的发生提供参考。研究设计和方法:本研究分析了FAERS数据库2019年12月至2023年12月报告的与T-DXd相关的ae的真实数据,并结合报告优势比、比例报告比、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络和多项目γ泊松收缩法对报告进行识别和评估,可以减少假阳性和假阴性信号的数量,具有良好的灵敏度。结果:共收集到T-DXd作为“主要嫌疑”的AE报告4651份。到T-DXd相关ae发作的中位时间为25天。严重不良反应占69.40%。住院(25.67%)和死亡(24.19%)占临床严重结局发生频次最高。发生频率和信号强度均居前三位的AE均为间质性肺疾病。我们还发现了腹水、脓毒症、乙基肺囊虫肺炎、肠胃炎李斯特菌等12种药物标签中未记录的潜在新危险信号,需要在临床实践中进一步关注和验证。结论:本研究结果提示及时挖掘和更新药物不良反应信息的重要性。使用T-DXd前应做好药物评价,治疗过程中应密切监测肺、骨髓造血、心功能等指标,及时采取干预措施,避免不良反应引起相关损伤。
{"title":"Mining and analysis of adverse event signals of trastuzumab deruxtecan via real-world data of FDA adverse event reporting system database from 2019 to 2023.","authors":"Xiangyu Li, Fang Yang, Fuqun Zhou, Shenghong Zhu, Lingjing Yuan, Li Ma","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2439510","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2439510","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a novel generation antibody-drug conjugate. However, current evidence for the safety of T-DXd is mostly limited to clinical trials. Therefore, we mine and analyze adverse events (AEs) caused by T-DXd based on the FAERS database and to provide reference for the safe use of drug in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>AEs associated with T-DXd were analyzed in the FAERS database from December 2019 to December 2023, and four disproportionality methods were combined to identify and evaluate reports.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4651 AE reports of T-DXd as the 'primary suspect' were collected. The median time to onset of T-DXd-related AEs was 25 days. The proportion of serious AEs was 69.40%. Death (24.19%) accounted for the highest occurrence frequency of clinical serious outcomes. The top three AEs in both frequency and signal intensity were interstitial lung disease. We also found 12 novel AEs not recorded in the drug label.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study indicate the importance of timely mining and updating information of adverse drug reactions. Drug evaluation should be performed well before using T-DXd, and timely intervention measures should be taken to avoid related injury caused by AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"301-310"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142791391","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A comparative analysis of the safety profiles between inclisiran and other PCSK9 inhibitors from real-world evidence - what have we learned recently? 来自真实世界证据的inclisiran和其他PCSK9抑制剂之间的安全性对比分析-我们最近学到了什么?
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-11 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2438753
Su Zhou, Zuyue Liao, Xiubi Chen, Jiong Tang, Yu Wang

Background: Inclisiran is a novel inhibitor of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). This study aimed to explore its safety profiles.

Research design and methods: Reports from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System were collected and analyzed from January 2021 to September 2023. The ROR method was employed to detect safety signals. Comparative analysis was conducted at levels of SOCs, HLGTs, and PTs with other PCSK9 inhibitors.

Results: A total of 136 safety signals were identified, and the majority were novel. In comparison with other PCSK9 inhibitors, inclisiran had a greater number of adverse drug events in 'Gastrointestinal disorders' and 'Infections and infestations.' 'Gastrointestinal symptoms and motility' and 'respiratory and urinary tract infections' are the principal causes for the aforementioned safety issues. Nevertheless, inclisiran demonstrates potential advantages in terms of safety, particularly in 'Eye disorders,' 'Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' and 'General disorders and administration site condition.'

Conclusion: Due to distinctive pharmacological mechanism of action, the safety issues of inclisiran merit meticulous consideration. There are some safety profile tendencies that differ from other PCSK9 inhibitors. Therefore, special attention should be paid to its administration in high-risk populations. Additionally, some results remain uncertain, requiring further verification.

背景:Inclisiran是一种新型的枯草杆菌蛋白转化酶PCSK9 (subtilisin/ keexin type 9)抑制剂。本研究旨在通过现实世界的研究来探索其安全性。研究设计和方法:收集并分析2021年1月至2023年9月FDA不良事件报告系统的报告。采用报告优势比法检测安全信号。比较分析了SOCs、hlgt和PTs与其他PCSK9抑制剂的水平。结果:共识别出136个安全信号,其中大部分是新信号。与其他PCSK9抑制剂相比,inclisiran在“胃肠道疾病”和“感染和感染”方面有更多的药物不良事件。“胃肠道症状和运动”、“呼吸道和尿路感染”是导致上述安全问题的主要原因。然而,inclisiran在安全性方面显示出潜在的优势,特别是在“眼部疾病”、“皮肤和皮下组织疾病”和“一般疾病和给药部位状况”方面。结论:由于其独特的药理作用机制,其安全性问题值得慎重考虑。与其他PCSK9抑制剂不同,它有一些安全性倾向。因此,应特别注意高危人群的用药。此外,一些结果仍然不确定,需要进一步核实。
{"title":"A comparative analysis of the safety profiles between inclisiran and other PCSK9 inhibitors from real-world evidence - what have we learned recently?","authors":"Su Zhou, Zuyue Liao, Xiubi Chen, Jiong Tang, Yu Wang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438753","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438753","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inclisiran is a novel inhibitor of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9). This study aimed to explore its safety profiles.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Reports from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System were collected and analyzed from January 2021 to September 2023. The ROR method was employed to detect safety signals. Comparative analysis was conducted at levels of SOCs, HLGTs, and PTs with other PCSK9 inhibitors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 136 safety signals were identified, and the majority were novel. In comparison with other PCSK9 inhibitors, inclisiran had a greater number of adverse drug events in 'Gastrointestinal disorders' and 'Infections and infestations.' 'Gastrointestinal symptoms and motility' and 'respiratory and urinary tract infections' are the principal causes for the aforementioned safety issues. Nevertheless, inclisiran demonstrates potential advantages in terms of safety, particularly in 'Eye disorders,' 'Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' and 'General disorders and administration site condition.'</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Due to distinctive pharmacological mechanism of action, the safety issues of inclisiran merit meticulous consideration. There are some safety profile tendencies that differ from other PCSK9 inhibitors. Therefore, special attention should be paid to its administration in high-risk populations. Additionally, some results remain uncertain, requiring further verification.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"343-354"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142791390","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Signal detection and analysis of sulfasalazine adverse reaction events based on the US FDA adverse event reporting database. 基于美国FDA不良反应报告数据库的柳氮磺胺嘧啶不良反应事件信号检测与分析
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2438745
Yikuan Du, Lingzhi Zhang, Liang Shi, Zhuoming Guo, Ziyi Luo, Ye Zheng, Yu Zeng, Yin Huang, Jiawen Luo, Xiaochun Guo, Mianda Hu, Yuhong Chen, Jinfeng Zhu, Yi Liu, Chun Yang

Background: Based on real data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), we explored and evaluated the adverse reactions (ADRs) of sulfasalazine (SSZ) in the first quarter of 2004-2023 to provide a reference basis and early warning for the safe use of SSZ in the clinic.

Research design and methods: The reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) were used as measures of SSZ-associated adverse events (AEs) signals, mining for potential positive signals between SSZ and AE.

Results: In this study, a total of 5327 case reports related to SSZ in the last 20 years involving 25 system organ classes (SOCs) were collected in FAERS. The AEs of SSZ were mainly focused on Immune system disorders (n = 1621, IC025 = 2.86), Blood and lymphatic system disorders (n = 638, IC025 = 2.4), and others. In addition, we found 41 adverse reactions not mentioned in the specification, including oculomucocutaneous syndrome (n = 12, IC025 = 4.86), wegener's granulomatosis(n = 6, IC025 = 4.05) and reproductive system aspects.

Conclusion: Significant new AEs signals were observed in this study and may provide important support for clinical monitoring and risk identification in SSZ.

背景:基于美国FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的真实数据,对2004-2023年第一季度磺胺硫氮嗪(SSZ)的不良反应(adr)进行探讨和评价,为临床安全使用SSZ提供参考依据和预警。研究设计与方法:采用报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和经验贝叶斯几何平均(EBGM)作为SSZ相关不良事件(AE)信号的度量,挖掘SSZ与AE之间潜在的积极信号。结果:本研究共收集了近20年来FAERS中与SSZ相关的病例报告5327例,涉及25个系统器官类别(soc)。SSZ的ae主要集中在免疫系统疾病(n = 1621, IC025 = 2.86)、血液和淋巴系统疾病(n = 638, IC025 = 2.4)等。值得注意的是,更严重的DRESS综合征被包括在免疫系统疾病中。此外,我们还发现了说明书中未提及的41个不良反应,包括眼皮肤综合征(n = 12,IC025 = 4.86)、wegener肉芽肿病(n = 6, IC025 = 4.05)和生殖系统方面。结论:本研究观察到明显的新ae信号,可为SSZ的临床监测和风险识别提供重要支持。
{"title":"Signal detection and analysis of sulfasalazine adverse reaction events based on the US FDA adverse event reporting database.","authors":"Yikuan Du, Lingzhi Zhang, Liang Shi, Zhuoming Guo, Ziyi Luo, Ye Zheng, Yu Zeng, Yin Huang, Jiawen Luo, Xiaochun Guo, Mianda Hu, Yuhong Chen, Jinfeng Zhu, Yi Liu, Chun Yang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438745","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2438745","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Based on real data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), we explored and evaluated the adverse reactions (ADRs) of sulfasalazine (SSZ) in the first quarter of 2004-2023 to provide a reference basis and early warning for the safe use of SSZ in the clinic.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM) were used as measures of SSZ-associated adverse events (AEs) signals, mining for potential positive signals between SSZ and AE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In this study, a total of 5327 case reports related to SSZ in the last 20 years involving 25 system organ classes (SOCs) were collected in FAERS. The AEs of SSZ were mainly focused on Immune system disorders (<i>n</i> = 1621, IC025 = 2.86), Blood and lymphatic system disorders (<i>n</i> = 638, IC025 = 2.4), and others. In addition, we found 41 adverse reactions not mentioned in the specification, including oculomucocutaneous syndrome (<i>n</i> = 12, IC025 = 4.86), wegener's granulomatosis(<i>n</i> = 6, IC025 = 4.05) and reproductive system aspects.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant new AEs signals were observed in this study and may provide important support for clinical monitoring and risk identification in SSZ.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"325-335"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142785082","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety review of antithrombotic therapy options after left atrial appendage occlusion. 左心耳闭塞后抗血栓治疗方案的安全性评价。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-19 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2025.2547007
Aanchal Sawhney, Rahul Gupta, Pranav Mahajan, Ankit Agrawal, Sergio Cossu, Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy

Introduction: Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a viable alternative to anticoagulation for treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who cannot tolerate anticoagulation. Post-procedure patients are generally prescribed oral anticoagulation (OAC) for 45 days, while the device is undergoing endothelialization, following which patients are continued on antiplatelet agents. Recommendations for antithrombotic agents following LAAO arrived by consensus, which are not tolerated by all patients.

Areas covered: This review covers the safety profile of antithrombotic therapy options after LAAO. We discuss the side effect profiles including device-related thrombosis (DRT), bleeding, and thromboembolic events. The new randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis compared combinations of DOAC with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), VKA, or only SAPT and studied the incidence of major bleeding, DRT, and thromboembolic events. This review is a comprehensive summary of different antithrombotic agents' combinations along with the duration recommendations and emphasizes the importance of a discussion among involved team members and patients.

Expert opinion: In patients with NVAF undergoing LAAO, initial post-procedural antithrombotic monotherapy with DOAC is associated with low rates of thromboembolism, DRT, and major bleeding followed by DAPT. DAPT is associated with lower incidence of thromboembolic events in comparison to SAPT.

左心耳闭塞(LAAO)是治疗不能耐受抗凝治疗的非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者的可行替代抗凝治疗方法。术后患者通常在设备进行内皮化期间服用口服抗凝剂(OAC) 45天,之后患者继续服用抗血小板药物。LAAO后抗血栓药物的推荐是一致的,但并非所有患者都能耐受。涵盖领域:本综述涵盖LAAO后抗血栓治疗方案的安全性。我们讨论的副作用包括器械相关血栓形成(DRT)、出血和血栓栓塞事件。新的随机对照试验和荟萃分析比较了DOAC与单抗血小板治疗(SAPT)、双抗血小板治疗(DAPT)、VKA或仅SAPT的联合治疗,并研究了大出血、DRT和血栓栓塞事件的发生率。该综述综合总结了不同的抗血栓药物组合以及推荐的持续时间,并强调了在相关团队成员和患者之间进行讨论的重要性。专家意见:接受LAAO的非瓣膜性房颤患者,最初的术后抗血栓单药治疗与低血栓栓塞率、DRT和大出血发生率相关,随后是DAPT。与SAPT相比,DAPT与较低的血栓栓塞事件发生率相关。
{"title":"Safety review of antithrombotic therapy options after left atrial appendage occlusion.","authors":"Aanchal Sawhney, Rahul Gupta, Pranav Mahajan, Ankit Agrawal, Sergio Cossu, Dhanunjaya R Lakkireddy","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2547007","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2025.2547007","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a viable alternative to anticoagulation for treatment in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who cannot tolerate anticoagulation. Post-procedure patients are generally prescribed oral anticoagulation (OAC) for 45 days, while the device is undergoing endothelialization, following which patients are continued on antiplatelet agents. Recommendations for antithrombotic agents following LAAO arrived by consensus, which are not tolerated by all patients.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This review covers the safety profile of antithrombotic therapy options after LAAO. We discuss the side effect profiles including device-related thrombosis (DRT), bleeding, and thromboembolic events. The new randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis compared combinations of DOAC with single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT), dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), VKA, or only SAPT and studied the incidence of major bleeding, DRT, and thromboembolic events. This review is a comprehensive summary of different antithrombotic agents' combinations along with the duration recommendations and emphasizes the importance of a discussion among involved team members and patients.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>In patients with NVAF undergoing LAAO, initial post-procedural antithrombotic monotherapy with DOAC is associated with low rates of thromboembolism, DRT, and major bleeding followed by DAPT. DAPT is associated with lower incidence of thromboembolic events in comparison to SAPT.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"223-232"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"144821037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antibody-drug conjugates-related interstitial lung diseases: data mining of the FAERS database. 抗体药物共轭物相关间质性肺病:FAERS 数据库的数据挖掘。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2026-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-12 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2401025
Zicheng Yu, Haibin Zhu, Xiaolan Liao

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is a serious adverse event (AE) associated with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). This study aims to delve deeply into the signals of AE associated with ILD linked to ADCs.

Research design and methods: The AE reports were extracted from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023 based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Signal mining was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) method. Data management, analysis, and visualization were carried out using Python, R software, and MySQL.

Results: A total of 1389 AE reports related to ILD with 11 types of ADCs as the primary suspected drugs were obtained. The age groups most represented were 61-80 age group. ILD-related AE signals were detected for 11 ADCs in the study. Trastuzumab deruxtecan showed the strongest signals in both for ROR and MGPS methods. The median onset time vary from 8 days to 207 days.

Conclusions: The signals of ILD AE associated with ADCs are notably strong. ILD should be closely monitored and assessed in the clinical use of ADCs taking full account of the efficacy and risks of these drugs.

背景:间质性肺病(ILD)是与使用抗体药物共轭物(ADCs)相关的严重不良事件(AE)。本研究旨在利用数据挖掘方法深入研究与ADCs相关的间质性肺病的AE信号:根据FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,对2004年第一季度至2023年第四季度与ADC和ILD相关的AE报告进行了回顾性分析。采用报告几率比(ROR)法和多项目伽马泊松收缩器(MGPS)法进行信号挖掘。数据管理、分析和可视化使用 Python(3.8 版)、R 软件(4.2.1 版)和 MySQL(8.0.34 版)进行:结果:共获得 1389 份与 ILD 相关的 AE 报告,其中 11 种 ADC 为主要可疑药物。这些报告中出现最多的年龄组是 61-80 岁年龄组和 41-60 岁年龄组。曲妥珠单抗德鲁替康的报告最多。数据挖掘结果表明,研究中的 11 种 ADC 均检测到与 ILD 相关的 AE 信号。在 ROR 和 MGPS 两种方法中,曲妥珠单抗地昔康的信号最强。与 ILD 相关的 ADC 的中位发病时间从 8 天到 207 天不等:结论:与 ADC 相关的 ILD AE 信号并不强烈。在临床使用 ADCs 时,应充分考虑药物的疗效和风险以及患者的具体情况,密切监测和评估 ILD。
{"title":"Antibody-drug conjugates-related interstitial lung diseases: data mining of the FAERS database.","authors":"Zicheng Yu, Haibin Zhu, Xiaolan Liao","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2401025","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2401025","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is a serious adverse event (AE) associated with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs). This study aims to delve deeply into the signals of AE associated with ILD linked to ADCs.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>The AE reports were extracted from the first quarter of 2004 to the fourth quarter of 2023 based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Signal mining was performed using the reporting odds ratio (ROR) method and the multi-item gamma Poisson shrinker (MGPS) method. Data management, analysis, and visualization were carried out using Python, R software, and MySQL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1389 AE reports related to ILD with 11 types of ADCs as the primary suspected drugs were obtained. The age groups most represented were 61-80 age group. ILD-related AE signals were detected for 11 ADCs in the study. Trastuzumab deruxtecan showed the strongest signals in both for ROR and MGPS methods. The median onset time vary from 8 days to 207 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The signals of ILD AE associated with ADCs are notably strong. ILD should be closely monitored and assessed in the clinical use of ADCs taking full account of the efficacy and risks of these drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"411-417"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142125243","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1