首页 > 最新文献

Expert Opinion on Drug Safety最新文献

英文 中文
Adverse events associated with aromatase inhibitors: an analysis of real-world datasets and drug-gene interaction network. 与芳香化酶抑制剂相关的不良事件:真实世界数据集和药物基因相互作用网络分析》。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-11 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2424443
Si-Qi Zhang, Shujing Jia, Xiang Li, Rui-Rui Hu, Zhanyang Luo, Junhai Wang, Hongyan Xi

Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are commonly used to treat postmenopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer, but there is currently a lack of comprehensive safety reports on AIs in large-scale cohorts.

Research design and methods: We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance survey based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, retrieving relevant reports from the 2004 to the 2023, aiming to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of adverse reactions associated with AIs. In addition, we elucidated the potential toxicological mechanisms of AIs related adverse events through functional enrichment analysis.

Results: A total of 7,933 adverse event reports related to AIs were collected, and there were 642 positive signals at the preferred term level. The top three signal intensities for anastrozole are: antiphospholipid syndrome, plantar fasciitis and autoimmune pancreatitis. The top three signal intensities for letrozole are: androgenetic alopecia and myosclerosis, pneumonic herpes virus. The top three signal intensities for exemestane are: infection reactivation, thyroxine free decreased and dilatation atrial. In terms of onset time, letrozole has the earliest onset time overall, followed by exemestane, and finally anastrozole.

Conclusions: Our research corroborates the typical adverse events linked to AIs while highlighting potential safety concerns in their real-world clinical application.

背景:芳香化酶抑制剂(AIs)是治疗绝经后激素受体阳性乳腺癌的常用药物,但目前缺乏大规模队列中关于AIs的全面安全性报告:我们基于美国食品药品管理局的不良事件报告系统进行了一项回顾性药物警戒调查,检索了从 2004 年第一季度到 2023 年第三季度的相关报告,旨在对临床实践中常用人工合成药物的相关不良反应进行全面的比较分析。不良事件信号采用不成比例分析法进行评估。此外,我们还通过对与人工合成药物相互作用的人类基因进行功能富集分析,阐明了芳香化酶抑制剂相关不良反应的潜在毒理学机制:结果:共收集了 7,933 份与 AIs 相关的不良事件报告,其中有 642 个首选术语级别的阳性信号。阿那曲唑的前三个信号强度分别是:抗磷脂综合征、足底筋膜炎和自身免疫性胰腺炎。来曲唑的前三位信号强度是:雄激素性脱发和肌硬化症、肺疱疹病毒。依西美坦的前三位信号强度是:感染再激活、游离甲状腺素减少和心房扩张。从发病时间来看,来曲唑的发病时间最早,其次是依西美坦,最后是阿那曲唑:我们的研究证实了与人工合成药物相关的典型不良事件,同时强调了在实际临床应用中可能存在的安全问题。
{"title":"Adverse events associated with aromatase inhibitors: an analysis of real-world datasets and drug-gene interaction network.","authors":"Si-Qi Zhang, Shujing Jia, Xiang Li, Rui-Rui Hu, Zhanyang Luo, Junhai Wang, Hongyan Xi","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2424443","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2424443","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are commonly used to treat postmenopausal hormone receptor positive breast cancer, but there is currently a lack of comprehensive safety reports on AIs in large-scale cohorts.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective pharmacovigilance survey based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System, retrieving relevant reports from the 2004 to the 2023, aiming to conduct a comprehensive comparative analysis of adverse reactions associated with AIs. In addition, we elucidated the potential toxicological mechanisms of AIs related adverse events through functional enrichment analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 7,933 adverse event reports related to AIs were collected, and there were 642 positive signals at the preferred term level. The top three signal intensities for anastrozole are: antiphospholipid syndrome, plantar fasciitis and autoimmune pancreatitis. The top three signal intensities for letrozole are: androgenetic alopecia and myosclerosis, pneumonic herpes virus. The top three signal intensities for exemestane are: infection reactivation, thyroxine free decreased and dilatation atrial. In terms of onset time, letrozole has the earliest onset time overall, followed by exemestane, and finally anastrozole.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our research corroborates the typical adverse events linked to AIs while highlighting potential safety concerns in their real-world clinical application.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142575642","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real-world analysis of levetiracetam-associated rhabdomyolysis: insights from the FDA adverse event reporting system. 左乙拉西坦相关横纹肌溶解症的真实世界分析:美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统的启示。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-08 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2421340
Guo Yinan, Gong Guangming, Guo Guangyu, Cheng Xianghai, Yin Jingwen, Qin Jie

Background: Levetiracetam, a widely prescribed antiseizure medication, is recognized for its broad-spectrum efficacy, good tolerability, and minimal drug interactions. This study examines the association between levetiracetam and rhabdomyolysis, utilizing real-world data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to further elucidate its safety profile.

Methods: This study extracted adverse events related to levetiracetam from the FAERS database (Q1 2013 to Q1 2024). Four types of disproportionality analysis identified rhabdomyolysis as a significant adverse event. Logistic regression assessed risk factors, including gender, age, and severity. A Gaussian Mixture Model analyzed the time-to-onset distribution of rhabdomyolysis, while the impact of concomitant medications on its risk was evaluated using Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR).

Results: Levetiracetam significantly increased rhabdomyolysis risk (ROR = 13.5). Males showed a higher incidence (OR = 2.60). Most adverse events occurred within the first 30 days, with a bimodal onset distribution. Co-administration of antibiotics, antipsychotics, and PPIs elevated the risk while other antiseizure medications did not.

Conclusion: This study found a significant association between levetiracetam and the risk of rhabdomyolysis, highlighting the need for increased clinical vigilance in this patient population. Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms and optimizing clinical guidelines.

背景:左乙拉西坦是一种广泛处方的抗癫痫药物,因其广谱的疗效、良好的耐受性和极少的药物相互作用而广受认可。本研究利用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中的真实数据,探讨了左乙拉西坦与横纹肌溶解症之间的关联,以进一步阐明其安全性:本研究从FAERS数据库(2013年第一季度至2024年第一季度)中提取了与左乙拉西坦相关的不良事件。四种比例失调分析确定横纹肌溶解症是一种重要的不良事件。逻辑回归评估了风险因素,包括性别、年龄和严重程度。高斯混合模型分析了横纹肌溶解症的发病时间分布,同时使用报告比值比(ROR)评估了伴随用药对其风险的影响:结果:左乙拉西坦显著增加横纹肌溶解风险(ROR = 13.5)。男性发病率更高(OR = 2.60)。大多数不良事件发生在最初的30天内,呈双峰分布。同时服用抗生素、抗精神病药和PPIs会增加风险,而其他抗癫痫药物则不会:本研究发现,左乙拉西坦与横纹肌溶解症的风险有明显关联,这突出表明临床上需要对这一患者群体提高警惕。未来的研究应侧重于阐明潜在机制和优化临床指南。
{"title":"Real-world analysis of levetiracetam-associated rhabdomyolysis: insights from the FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Guo Yinan, Gong Guangming, Guo Guangyu, Cheng Xianghai, Yin Jingwen, Qin Jie","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2421340","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2421340","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Levetiracetam, a widely prescribed antiseizure medication, is recognized for its broad-spectrum efficacy, good tolerability, and minimal drug interactions. This study examines the association between levetiracetam and rhabdomyolysis, utilizing real-world data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database to further elucidate its safety profile.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study extracted adverse events related to levetiracetam from the FAERS database (Q1 2013 to Q1 2024). Four types of disproportionality analysis identified rhabdomyolysis as a significant adverse event. Logistic regression assessed risk factors, including gender, age, and severity. A Gaussian Mixture Model analyzed the time-to-onset distribution of rhabdomyolysis, while the impact of concomitant medications on its risk was evaluated using Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Levetiracetam significantly increased rhabdomyolysis risk (ROR = 13.5). Males showed a higher incidence (OR = 2.60). Most adverse events occurred within the first 30 days, with a bimodal onset distribution. Co-administration of antibiotics, antipsychotics, and PPIs elevated the risk while other antiseizure medications did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found a significant association between levetiracetam and the risk of rhabdomyolysis, highlighting the need for increased clinical vigilance in this patient population. Future research should focus on elucidating the underlying mechanisms and optimizing clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142497753","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Ocular adverse events associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a real-world study based on the FAERS database and network pharmacology. 与 GLP-1 受体激动剂相关的眼部不良事件:基于 FAERS 数据库和网络药理学的真实世界研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2419989
Zhan-Yang Luo, Xiang Li, Cui-Ting Chen, Hong-Hua Kang, Zhi-Jie Zhang, Dong Wang, Jing-Ru Gong

Objective: This study evaluates the risk of ocular adverse events (AEs) associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and network pharmacology methods.

Methods: FAERS data from 2004 to 2024 were analyzed for ocular AEs linked to GLP-1 RA treatments. Disproportionality analysis (Reporting Odds Ratio, ROR) was used to identify signals, and a drug-gene interaction network explored potential mechanisms.

Results: Among 17,785,793 FAERS reports, semaglutide and lixisenatide were significantly associated with ocular AEs, with RORs of 1.25 (95% CI, 1.20-1.31) and 1.96 (95% CI, 1.70-2.27), respectively. Commonly reported AEs included blurred vision, visual impairment, and diabetic retinopathy, with some AEs occurring as early as 10 days after treatment initiation. Gene enrichment analysis highlighted potential links between GLP-1-related genes and ocular AEs.

Conclusion: The widespread use of GLP-1 RAs has raised concerns regarding their ophthalmic safety. This study contributes new evidence from real-world data, suggesting that semaglutide and lixisenatide are associated with significant risks of ocular AEs. Further experimental studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and confirm these associations.

研究目的本研究通过分析美国食品药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据并采用网络药理学方法,评估与胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)相关的眼部不良事件(AEs)的风险:分析了 2004 年第一季度至 2024 年第一季度的 FAERS 数据,重点关注与 GLP-1 RA 治疗相关的眼部 AE 报告。采用报告几率比(ROR)进行比例失调分析,以确定眼部AEs信号。此外,还利用来自多个公共数据库的数据构建了药物-基因相互作用网络,以阐明这些AEs的潜在机制:结果:对FAERS数据库中的17,785,793份报告进行分析后发现,semaglutide、lixisenatide与眼部AEs之间存在显著关联。塞马鲁肽的ROR为1.25(95% CI,1.20-1.31),利塞那肽的ROR为1.96(95% CI,1.70-2.27),表明眼部AEs风险增加。经常报告的眼部 AE 包括视力模糊、视力损害和糖尿病视网膜病变。发病时间分析表明,有些AE最早可在治疗开始后10天出现。基因富集分析进一步强调了GLP-1相关基因与眼部AEs之间的潜在联系:结论:GLP-1 RAs 的广泛使用引起了人们对其眼科安全性的关注。本研究提供了来自真实世界数据的新证据,表明塞马鲁肽和利塞那肽与眼部AEs的重大风险相关。有必要开展进一步的实验研究,以阐明其潜在机制并确认这些关联。
{"title":"Ocular adverse events associated with GLP-1 receptor agonists: a real-world study based on the FAERS database and network pharmacology.","authors":"Zhan-Yang Luo, Xiang Li, Cui-Ting Chen, Hong-Hua Kang, Zhi-Jie Zhang, Dong Wang, Jing-Ru Gong","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2419989","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2419989","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluates the risk of ocular adverse events (AEs) associated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) using data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) and network pharmacology methods.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>FAERS data from 2004 to 2024 were analyzed for ocular AEs linked to GLP-1 RA treatments. Disproportionality analysis (Reporting Odds Ratio, ROR) was used to identify signals, and a drug-gene interaction network explored potential mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 17,785,793 FAERS reports, semaglutide and lixisenatide were significantly associated with ocular AEs, with RORs of 1.25 (95% CI, 1.20-1.31) and 1.96 (95% CI, 1.70-2.27), respectively. Commonly reported AEs included blurred vision, visual impairment, and diabetic retinopathy, with some AEs occurring as early as 10 days after treatment initiation. Gene enrichment analysis highlighted potential links between GLP-1-related genes and ocular AEs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The widespread use of GLP-1 RAs has raised concerns regarding their ophthalmic safety. This study contributes new evidence from real-world data, suggesting that semaglutide and lixisenatide are associated with significant risks of ocular AEs. Further experimental studies are warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanisms and confirm these associations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142461473","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Is metformin safe in pregnancy: a focus on offspring outcomes. 二甲双胍在孕期是否安全:关注后代的结果。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2424410
Rana Malek, Stephen N Davis

Introduction: Metformin has been part of treatment algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for decades. While it has formal approval in the U.S.A. for treatment of T2DM, it is used off-label in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), and ovarian hyperstimulation prevention. Its role as an insulin sensitizer has made it an attractive therapeutic to address the insulin resistance seen in these syndromes. In 2022, the European Union approved metformin as the only oral antidiabetic medication for diabetes in pregnancy. While its safety and benefits for the mother are well documented, it does cross the placenta with plasma concentrations comparable between mother and child at delivery.

Areas covered: This special report will focus on major randomized control trials investigating metformin use in pregnancies impacted by PCOS, GDM, T2DM, and obesity and their offspring follow-up trials.

Expert opinion: For the mother, metformin can be beneficial, with reduction in insulin therapeutic burden, weight gain, hypoglycemia and in certain situations, pre-eclampsia. For the neonate, benefits may include reduction in hypoglycemia and no increased risk of congenital anomalies. It is the long-term data in the offspring that remains unknown with some areas of concerns (SGA, altered anthropometrics) requiring continued research.

简介数十年来,二甲双胍一直是 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)治疗方案的一部分。虽然二甲双胍在美国已被正式批准用于治疗 T2DM,但它也被用于妊娠糖尿病(GDM)、多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)和卵巢过度刺激预防。胰岛素增敏剂的作用使其成为解决这些综合征中出现的胰岛素抵抗的一种有吸引力的疗法。2022 年,欧盟批准二甲双胍作为治疗妊娠糖尿病的唯一口服抗糖尿病药物。虽然二甲双胍的安全性和对母亲的益处有据可查,但它会穿过胎盘,母亲和婴儿在分娩时的血浆浓度相当:本特别报告将重点关注调查二甲双胍在受多囊卵巢综合征、糖尿病、T2DM 和肥胖症影响的妊娠中使用情况的主要随机对照试验及其后代随访试验:专家观点:二甲双胍对母亲有益,可减少胰岛素治疗负担、体重增加、低血糖,在某些情况下还可减少先兆子痫。对新生儿而言,二甲双胍的益处可能包括减少低血糖,以及不会增加先天性畸形的风险。后代的长期数据仍是未知数,一些令人担忧的方面(SGA、人体测量学改变)需要继续研究。
{"title":"Is metformin safe in pregnancy: a focus on offspring outcomes.","authors":"Rana Malek, Stephen N Davis","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2424410","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2424410","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Metformin has been part of treatment algorithms for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) for decades. While it has formal approval in the U.S.A. for treatment of T2DM, it is used off-label in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS), and ovarian hyperstimulation prevention. Its role as an insulin sensitizer has made it an attractive therapeutic to address the insulin resistance seen in these syndromes. In 2022, the European Union approved metformin as the only oral antidiabetic medication for diabetes in pregnancy. While its safety and benefits for the mother are well documented, it does cross the placenta with plasma concentrations comparable between mother and child at delivery.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This special report will focus on major randomized control trials investigating metformin use in pregnancies impacted by PCOS, GDM, T2DM, and obesity and their offspring follow-up trials.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>For the mother, metformin can be beneficial, with reduction in insulin therapeutic burden, weight gain, hypoglycemia and in certain situations, pre-eclampsia. For the neonate, benefits may include reduction in hypoglycemia and no increased risk of congenital anomalies. It is the long-term data in the offspring that remains unknown with some areas of concerns (SGA, altered anthropometrics) requiring continued research.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142557495","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Statin alternatives for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia - a safety evaluation. 治疗高胆固醇血症的他汀类药物替代品--安全性评估。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2424411
Weiwei Zeng, Brian Tomlinson

Introduction: Statins are well established as the first-line treatment to reduce low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular (CV) events, but some patients are unable to tolerate effective doses or sometimes any dose of statins and alternative treatments may be required.

Areas covered: In this review we summarize the relevant published literature obtained from a PubMed search on the safety of statin alternatives for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.

Expert opinion: The main alternatives to statins are ezetimibe, the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, evolocumab, alirocumab, and inclisiran, and the recently approved bempedoic acid. These have all shown an excellent safety profile and have not been associated with skeletal muscle symptoms or with increased risk of new onset diabetes and they have no major drug interactions. The injectable PCSK9 inhibitors are associated with a small increase in injection site reactions which are usually of mild or moderate intensity. Bempedoic acid is associated with a small increase in plasma uric acid and slightly increased frequency of episodes of gout in susceptible subjects. The cost and availability and the degree of lowering of LDL-C required are more likely to determine the choice of statin alternatives than the safety issues.

导言:他汀类药物是降低低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)和心血管(CV)事件的一线治疗药物,但有些患者无法耐受有效剂量的他汀类药物,有时甚至无法耐受任何剂量的他汀类药物,因此可能需要使用替代疗法。专家观点:在本综述中,我们总结了通过PubMed搜索获得的相关已发表文献,这些文献涉及他汀类药物替代品治疗高胆固醇血症的安全性:专家观点:他汀类药物的主要替代药物有依折麦布、蛋白转换酶亚基酶/kexin 9型(PCSK9)抑制剂、evolocumab、alirocumab和inclisiran,以及最近获批的贝美多克酸。这些药物都显示出极佳的安全性,与骨骼肌症状或新发糖尿病风险增加无关,也没有重大的药物相互作用。注射用 PCSK9 抑制剂与注射部位反应的小幅增加有关,这些反应通常为轻度或中度。本贝多酸与易感人群血浆尿酸的小幅升高和痛风发作频率的轻微增加有关。与安全性问题相比,他汀类药物替代品的成本、可获得性和所需的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇降低程度更有可能决定患者的选择。
{"title":"Statin alternatives for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia - a safety evaluation.","authors":"Weiwei Zeng, Brian Tomlinson","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2424411","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2424411","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Statins are well established as the first-line treatment to reduce low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and cardiovascular (CV) events, but some patients are unable to tolerate effective doses or sometimes any dose of statins and alternative treatments may be required.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>In this review we summarize the relevant published literature obtained from a PubMed search on the safety of statin alternatives for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The main alternatives to statins are ezetimibe, the proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors, evolocumab, alirocumab, and inclisiran, and the recently approved bempedoic acid. These have all shown an excellent safety profile and have not been associated with skeletal muscle symptoms or with increased risk of new onset diabetes and they have no major drug interactions. The injectable PCSK9 inhibitors are associated with a small increase in injection site reactions which are usually of mild or moderate intensity. Bempedoic acid is associated with a small increase in plasma uric acid and slightly increased frequency of episodes of gout in susceptible subjects. The cost and availability and the degree of lowering of LDL-C required are more likely to determine the choice of statin alternatives than the safety issues.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142557496","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Drug-induced noninfectious myocarditis: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database. 药物诱发的非感染性心肌炎:FAERS 数据库的比例失调分析。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-03 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2423679
Liyuan Yan, Guanqun Zheng

Background: This investigation aims to identify and evaluate the most common and critical drugs associated with the risk of noninfectious myocarditis utilizing the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Methods: Data pertaining to noninfectious myocarditis from 2004 Q1 to 2024 Q2 were extracted. Following data standardization, multiple signal quantification techniques, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio, were employed for analysis.

Results: The study identified a total of 10,763 adverse event reports associated with noninfectious myocarditis. Disproportionality analysis revealed that the top 5 drugs by ROR were phendimetrazine tartrate (ROR 104.64), trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole (ROR 67.65), aldesleukin (ROR 52.67), mesalazine (ROR 49.73), and balsalazide disodium (ROR 45.26). Notably, among the 30 drugs with the strongest ROR signals, 8 drugs lacked myocarditis risk information in their package inserts.

Conclusion: Through comprehensive analysis of the FAERS database, our study identified drugs with a strong signal for myocarditis that are not currently indicated on their labels. The findings suggest that the potential risk of myocarditis associated with these medications is significant and warrants close monitoring in clinical practice.

背景:本调查旨在利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,确定并评估与非感染性心肌炎风险相关的最常见和最关键药物:这项调查旨在利用美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库,确定和评估与非感染性心肌炎风险相关的最常见和最重要的药物:提取2004年第一季度至2024年第二季度与非感染性心肌炎相关的数据。数据标准化后,采用多种信号量化技术进行分析,包括报告比值比(ROR)和比例报告比:研究共发现了 10,763 份与非感染性心肌炎相关的不良事件报告。比例失调分析显示,按ROR计算,排名前5位的药物分别是酒石酸芬地美嗪(ROR 104.64)、三甲双胍+磺胺甲噁唑(ROR 67.65)、醛固酮(ROR 52.67)、美沙拉秦(ROR 49.73)和巴柳氮二钠(ROR 45.26)。值得注意的是,在 ROR 信号最强的 30 种药物中,有 8 种药物的包装说明书中缺乏心肌炎风险信息:通过对 FAERS 数据库的全面分析,我们的研究发现了目前标签上未标明的心肌炎强信号药物。研究结果表明,这些药物引发心肌炎的潜在风险很大,需要在临床实践中密切监测。
{"title":"Drug-induced noninfectious myocarditis: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database.","authors":"Liyuan Yan, Guanqun Zheng","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2423679","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2423679","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This investigation aims to identify and evaluate the most common and critical drugs associated with the risk of noninfectious myocarditis utilizing the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data pertaining to noninfectious myocarditis from 2004 Q1 to 2024 Q2 were extracted. Following data standardization, multiple signal quantification techniques, including Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio, were employed for analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study identified a total of 10,763 adverse event reports associated with noninfectious myocarditis. Disproportionality analysis revealed that the top 5 drugs by ROR were phendimetrazine tartrate (ROR 104.64), trimethoprim + sulfamethoxazole (ROR 67.65), aldesleukin (ROR 52.67), mesalazine (ROR 49.73), and balsalazide disodium (ROR 45.26). Notably, among the 30 drugs with the strongest ROR signals, 8 drugs lacked myocarditis risk information in their package inserts.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Through comprehensive analysis of the FAERS database, our study identified drugs with a strong signal for myocarditis that are not currently indicated on their labels. The findings suggest that the potential risk of myocarditis associated with these medications is significant and warrants close monitoring in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142544569","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Adverse events in patients with cardiovascular disease taking proton pump inhibitors. 服用前列腺素泵抑制剂的心血管疾病患者的不良反应。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-28 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2409702
Aitor Lanas-Gimeno, Ángel Lanas

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) rank among the most frequently prescribed medications to treat acid-related diseases. Mounting concerns surround the potential for serious adverse events, including cardiovascular events, associated with their prolonged use/misuse.

Areas covered: This comprehensive review explores cardiovascular adverse events linked to PPI use among high-risk cardiovascular patients. A structured search was conducted on PubMed.

Expert opinion: Many patients with cardiovascular disease who require antiplatelet treatment will require long-term PPI treatment. Interpreting the published data is not straightforward. First, because there is no plausible mechanistic explanation for PPIs to induce cardiovascular events apart from the potential interaction with the metabolism of thienopyridines. Although several observational studies have shown an increased cardiovascular risk and mortality in patients taking long-term PPIs, most available clinical trials and meta-analyses of available studies do not. However, the absence of firm evidence of this link does not necessarily imply that this association does not exist, and other hypothesis must be explored. Anemia is a common event in patients who take antiplatelet therapy and PPIs, and it is a factor associated with cardiovascular events and death. Anemia in these patients is often attributed to erosive lesions of the small intestine, where PPI may play a key role by modifying the microbiota.

导言:质子泵抑制剂(PPIs)是治疗胃酸相关疾病最常用的处方药之一。人们越来越关注长期使用/滥用这些药物可能导致的严重不良事件,包括心血管事件:本综述探讨了与高危心血管患者使用 PPI 相关的心血管不良事件。在PubMed上进行了结构化检索:许多需要抗血小板治疗的心血管疾病患者需要长期服用 PPI。解读已发表的数据并不简单。首先,除了与噻吩并吡啶类药物代谢的潜在相互作用外,PPIs 诱发心血管事件并没有合理的机理解释。虽然有几项观察性研究显示长期服用 PPIs 的患者心血管风险和死亡率会增加,但大多数现有的临床试验和对现有研究的荟萃分析都没有显示出这一点。然而,没有确凿证据证明这种联系并不一定意味着这种联系不存在,还必须探索其他假设。贫血是服用抗血小板疗法和 PPIs 患者的常见病,也是心血管事件和死亡的相关因素之一。这些患者贫血的原因通常是小肠侵蚀性病变,而 PPI 可能通过改变微生物群起到关键作用。
{"title":"Adverse events in patients with cardiovascular disease taking proton pump inhibitors.","authors":"Aitor Lanas-Gimeno, Ángel Lanas","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2409702","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2409702","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) rank among the most frequently prescribed medications to treat acid-related diseases. Mounting concerns surround the potential for serious adverse events, including cardiovascular events, associated with their prolonged use/misuse.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This comprehensive review explores cardiovascular adverse events linked to PPI use among high-risk cardiovascular patients. A structured search was conducted on PubMed.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Many patients with cardiovascular disease who require antiplatelet treatment will require long-term PPI treatment. Interpreting the published data is not straightforward. First, because there is no plausible mechanistic explanation for PPIs to induce cardiovascular events apart from the potential interaction with the metabolism of thienopyridines. Although several observational studies have shown an increased cardiovascular risk and mortality in patients taking long-term PPIs, most available clinical trials and meta-analyses of available studies do not. However, the absence of firm evidence of this link does not necessarily imply that this association does not exist, and other hypothesis must be explored. Anemia is a common event in patients who take antiplatelet therapy and PPIs, and it is a factor associated with cardiovascular events and death. Anemia in these patients is often attributed to erosive lesions of the small intestine, where PPI may play a key role by modifying the microbiota.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142361380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Safety considerations for drugs newly approved for treating acute myeloid leukemia. 新批准用于治疗急性髓性白血病的药物的安全性考虑因素。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-08 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2412236
Aleksandra Gołos, Joanna Góra-Tybor, Tadeusz Robak

Introduction: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is typically characterized by a poor prognosis, mainly due to the median age at diagnosis. Until recently, treatment options were limited to intensive chemotherapy (IC) for young patients or hypomethylating agents for those ineligible for IC. Since 2017, nine molecules were registered for newly-diagnosed AML: midostaurin, gilteritinib, quizartinib, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, CPX-351, glasdegib, and venetoclax.

Areas covered: The review examines the safety profile of these drugs and their interactions with other agents used in supportive care. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles in English concerning new agents in AML from 2017 until 2023. Further relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the prescribing information and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data.

Expert opinion: The therapeutic spectrum in AML has broadened over several years and can also improve outcomes in older patients. However, in addition to their well-known cytotoxic activity, new molecules cause several unique, off-target toxicities. Also, potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) should be taken into consideration when choosing optimal first-line therapy; this remains a challenge in clinical practice.

简介急性髓性白血病(AML)的典型特征是预后不良,这主要是由于诊断时的中位年龄。直到最近,治疗方案还仅限于对年轻患者进行强化化疗,或对不符合强化化疗条件的患者使用低甲基化药物。自2017年以来,有9种分子被注册用于新诊断的急性髓细胞性白血病:米多司林、吉尔替尼、奎沙替尼、依那西替尼、伊维替尼、吉妥珠单抗奥佐霉素、CPX-351、格拉斯替尼和venetoclax.涉及领域:本综述探讨了这些药物的安全性及其与用于支持性治疗的其他药物之间的相互作用。在PubMed和谷歌学术数据库中检索了2017年至2023年有关急性髓细胞性白血病新药的英文文章。通过审查处方信息和食品药品管理局(FDA)数据,获得了更多相关出版物:几年来,急性髓细胞性白血病的治疗范围不断扩大,也能改善老年患者的预后。然而,除了众所周知的细胞毒性活性外,新分子还会引起一些独特的脱靶毒性。此外,在选择最佳一线疗法时,应考虑到潜在的药物间相互作用(DDI);这在临床实践中仍是一项挑战。
{"title":"Safety considerations for drugs newly approved for treating acute myeloid leukemia.","authors":"Aleksandra Gołos, Joanna Góra-Tybor, Tadeusz Robak","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412236","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2412236","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is typically characterized by a poor prognosis, mainly due to the median age at diagnosis. Until recently, treatment options were limited to intensive chemotherapy (IC) for young patients or hypomethylating agents for those ineligible for IC. Since 2017, nine molecules were registered for newly-diagnosed AML: midostaurin, gilteritinib, quizartinib, enasidenib, ivosidenib, gemtuzumab ozogamicin, CPX-351, glasdegib, and venetoclax.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>The review examines the safety profile of these drugs and their interactions with other agents used in supportive care. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched for articles in English concerning new agents in AML from 2017 until 2023. Further relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the prescribing information and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) data.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>The therapeutic spectrum in AML has broadened over several years and can also improve outcomes in older patients. However, in addition to their well-known cytotoxic activity, new molecules cause several unique, off-target toxicities. Also, potential drug-drug interactions (DDI) should be taken into consideration when choosing optimal first-line therapy; this remains a challenge in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142371409","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Analysis of hemorrhagic drug-drug interactions between P-gp inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. 从 FDA 不良事件报告系统中分析 P-gp 抑制剂和直接口服抗凝剂之间的出血性药物相互作用。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2376693
Mengyao Li, Jian Xiao, Ting Yu, Ling Huang, Ruwen Cai, Huimin Yu, Jingyang Li, Shuqiao Cheng

Background: Limited understanding exists regarding the hemorrhagic risk resulting from potential interactions between P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Utilizing the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data, we analyzed hemorrhagic adverse events (AEs) linked with the co-administration of P-gp inhibitors and DOACs, aiming to offer guidance for their safe and rational use.

Methods: Hemorrhagic events associated with P-gp inhibitors in combination with DOACs were scrutinized from the FAERS database. Hemorrhagic signals mining was performed by estimating the reported odds ratios (RORs), corroborated by additive and multiplicative models and a combination risk ratio (PRR) model.

Results: Our analysis covered 4,417,195 cases, revealing 11,967 bleeding events associated with P-gp inhibitors. We observed a significantly higher risk of bleeding with the combination of apixaban and felodipine (ROR 118.84, 95% CI 78.12-180.79, additive model 0.545, multiplicative model 1.253, PRR 22.896 (2450.141)). Moreover, consistent associations were found in the co-administration analyzes of rivaroxaban with dronedarone and diltiazem, and apixaban with losartan, telmisartan, and simvastatin.

Conclusion: Our FAERS data analysis unveils varying degrees of bleeding risk associated with the co-administration of P-gp inhibitors and DOACs, underscoring the importance of vigilance about them in clinical practice.

背景:关于P-糖蛋白(P-gp)抑制剂和直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)之间潜在的相互作用所导致的出血风险,目前所知有限。我们利用食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的数据,分析了与 P-gp 抑制剂和 DOACs 联合用药相关的出血不良事件(AEs),旨在为其安全合理使用提供指导。通过估算报告的几率比(ROR)进行出血信号挖掘分析,并使用加法和乘法模型以及组合风险比(PRR)模型进一步确认分析结果:我们的分析涵盖 4,417,195 个病例,发现 11,967 例出血事件与 P-gp 抑制剂有关。我们观察到阿哌沙班和非洛地平联合用药的出血风险明显更高(ROR 118.84,95% CI 78.12-180.79,加法模型 0.545,乘法模型 1.253,PRR 22.896(2450.141))。此外,在利伐沙班与决奈达隆和地尔硫卓以及阿哌沙班与洛沙坦、替米沙坦和辛伐他汀的联合用药分析中也发现了一致的关联:我们对 FAERS 数据的分析揭示了与 P-gp 抑制剂和 DOACs 联合用药相关的不同程度的出血风险,强调了在临床实践中对它们保持警惕的重要性。
{"title":"Analysis of hemorrhagic drug-drug interactions between P-gp inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System.","authors":"Mengyao Li, Jian Xiao, Ting Yu, Ling Huang, Ruwen Cai, Huimin Yu, Jingyang Li, Shuqiao Cheng","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2376693","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2376693","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Limited understanding exists regarding the hemorrhagic risk resulting from potential interactions between P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitors and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Utilizing the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data, we analyzed hemorrhagic adverse events (AEs) linked with the co-administration of P-gp inhibitors and DOACs, aiming to offer guidance for their safe and rational use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Hemorrhagic events associated with P-gp inhibitors in combination with DOACs were scrutinized from the FAERS database. Hemorrhagic signals mining was performed by estimating the reported odds ratios (RORs), corroborated by additive and multiplicative models and a combination risk ratio (PRR) model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis covered 4,417,195 cases, revealing 11,967 bleeding events associated with P-gp inhibitors. We observed a significantly higher risk of bleeding with the combination of apixaban and felodipine (ROR 118.84, 95% CI 78.12-180.79, additive model 0.545, multiplicative model 1.253, PRR 22.896 (2450.141)). Moreover, consistent associations were found in the co-administration analyzes of rivaroxaban with dronedarone and diltiazem, and apixaban with losartan, telmisartan, and simvastatin.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our FAERS data analysis unveils varying degrees of bleeding risk associated with the co-administration of P-gp inhibitors and DOACs, underscoring the importance of vigilance about them in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141497544","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
PARP inhibitor-related acute renal failure: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database. PARP 抑制剂相关急性肾衰竭:基于 FDA 不良事件报告系统数据库的真实世界研究。
IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2024.2376690
Xiayang Ren, Ping Sun, Yanfeng Wang

Background: Current clinical trial data on PARP inhibitors (PARPis)-related acute renal failure (ARF) are not entirely representative of real-world situations. Therefore, in this study, the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was used to evaluate PARPis-related ARF.

Research design and methods: Data were obtained from 1 January 2015, to 30 September 2023. ARF event reports were analyzed based on four algorithms. The time-to-onset (TTO) and clinical outcomes of PARPis-associated ARF were assessed.

Results: The total included cases were 2726. Significant signals were observed for olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib (reporting odds ratio (ROR): 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-1.78, 1.25, 95% CI: 1.19-1.32 and 1.59, 95% CI: 1.47-1.72 respectively). The median TTO of ARF onset was 57, 36, and 85 days for olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib, respectively. The proportion of deaths with olaparib (9.88%) was significantly higher than for niraparib (2.52%) and rucaparib (2.94%) (p < 0.005). The proportion of life-threatening adverse events associated with niraparib (4.89%) was significantly higher than for rucaparib (0.98%) (p < 0.005).

Conclusions: ARF and PARPi were related, with the exception of talazoparib. More emphasis should be given to PARPis-related ARF due to the high proportion of serious AEs and delayed adverse reactions.

背景:目前关于 PARP 抑制剂(PARPis)相关急性肾衰竭(ARF)的临床试验数据并不能完全代表真实世界的情况。因此,本研究采用美国食品药品管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)来评估PARPis相关的ARF:数据采集时间为 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 9 月 30 日。ARF事件报告根据四种算法进行分析。评估PARPis相关ARF的发病时间(TTO)和临床结果:结果:共纳入 2726 个病例。观察到奥拉帕利、尼拉帕利和鲁卡帕利出现了显著信号(报告几率比(ROR):1.62,95% 置信区间(CI):1.49-1.781.25,95% CI:1.19-1.32 和 1.59,95% CI:1.47-1.72),它们都出现了 "血肌酐升高 "和 "肾小球滤过率降低 "的阳性信号。奥拉帕利、尼拉帕利和芦卡帕利的ARF发病中位TTO分别为57天、36天和85天。与ARF相关的死亡、危及生命事件和住院不良事件(AEs)的比例分别为4.27%、3.57%和19.80%。奥拉帕利的死亡比例(9.88%)明显高于尼拉帕利(2.52%)和鲁卡帕利(2.94%)(p p 结论):ARF与PARPi有关,但talazoparib除外。肌酐水平升高和肾小球滤过率降低与奥拉帕利、尼拉帕利和芦卡帕利有关。由于 PARPis 相关 ARF 的严重 AE 和延迟不良反应比例较高,因此应更加重视 PARPis 相关 ARF。
{"title":"PARP inhibitor-related acute renal failure: a real-world study based on the FDA adverse event reporting system database.","authors":"Xiayang Ren, Ping Sun, Yanfeng Wang","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2376690","DOIUrl":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2376690","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current clinical trial data on PARP inhibitors (PARPis)-related acute renal failure (ARF) are not entirely representative of real-world situations. Therefore, in this study, the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) was used to evaluate PARPis-related ARF.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Data were obtained from 1 January 2015, to 30 September 2023. ARF event reports were analyzed based on four algorithms. The time-to-onset (TTO) and clinical outcomes of PARPis-associated ARF were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total included cases were 2726. Significant signals were observed for olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib (reporting odds ratio (ROR): 1.62, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.49-1.78, 1.25, 95% CI: 1.19-1.32 and 1.59, 95% CI: 1.47-1.72 respectively). The median TTO of ARF onset was 57, 36, and 85 days for olaparib, niraparib, and rucaparib, respectively. The proportion of deaths with olaparib (9.88%) was significantly higher than for niraparib (2.52%) and rucaparib (2.94%) (<i>p</i> < 0.005). The proportion of life-threatening adverse events associated with niraparib (4.89%) was significantly higher than for rucaparib (0.98%) (<i>p</i> < 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ARF and PARPi were related, with the exception of talazoparib. More emphasis should be given to PARPis-related ARF due to the high proportion of serious AEs and delayed adverse reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141533977","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Expert Opinion on Drug Safety
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1