Effects of Motor and Cognitive Dual-Task Demands on Ankle Dorsiflexor and Plantarflexor Force Control in Older Adults.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Experimental Aging Research Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1080/0361073X.2024.2406172
Riku Ishizaka, Ippei Nojima, Kazuto Ishida, Hideshi Sugiura, Aoki Takahashi, Kodai Minami, Tatsunori Watanabe
{"title":"Effects of Motor and Cognitive Dual-Task Demands on Ankle Dorsiflexor and Plantarflexor Force Control in Older Adults.","authors":"Riku Ishizaka, Ippei Nojima, Kazuto Ishida, Hideshi Sugiura, Aoki Takahashi, Kodai Minami, Tatsunori Watanabe","doi":"10.1080/0361073X.2024.2406172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Force steadiness can be impaired under dual-task conditions in older adults. Since this impairment is attributed to their limited attentional resources, we hypothesized that the degree of cortical activity involved in muscle contraction would affect force steadiness under dual-task conditions. To test this hypothesis, based on the premise that dorsiflexion requires more cortical resources than plantarflexion, we compared the effects of additional motor and cognitive task demands on force steadiness between dorsiflexion and plantarflexion contractions in young and older adults.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Eighteen young and eighteen older adults performed a force tracking task by applying either isometric dorsiflexion or plantarflexion force concurrently with and without (control) secondary upper-limb motor or cognitive task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Force steadiness was impaired by both secondary upper-limb motor and cognitive tasks for the dorsiflexors and plantarflexors in older adults. While force steadiness was impaired similarly by additional task demands regardless of the secondary task type for the dorsiflexors, the impairment effect was larger in the secondary cognitive than motor task for the plantarflexors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The effects of dual-task demand on force steadiness could depend on the degree of cortical activity involved in muscle contraction in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":12240,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Aging Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Aging Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2024.2406172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Force steadiness can be impaired under dual-task conditions in older adults. Since this impairment is attributed to their limited attentional resources, we hypothesized that the degree of cortical activity involved in muscle contraction would affect force steadiness under dual-task conditions. To test this hypothesis, based on the premise that dorsiflexion requires more cortical resources than plantarflexion, we compared the effects of additional motor and cognitive task demands on force steadiness between dorsiflexion and plantarflexion contractions in young and older adults.

Method: Eighteen young and eighteen older adults performed a force tracking task by applying either isometric dorsiflexion or plantarflexion force concurrently with and without (control) secondary upper-limb motor or cognitive task.

Results: Force steadiness was impaired by both secondary upper-limb motor and cognitive tasks for the dorsiflexors and plantarflexors in older adults. While force steadiness was impaired similarly by additional task demands regardless of the secondary task type for the dorsiflexors, the impairment effect was larger in the secondary cognitive than motor task for the plantarflexors.

Conclusion: The effects of dual-task demand on force steadiness could depend on the degree of cortical activity involved in muscle contraction in older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动和认知双重任务要求对老年人踝关节背屈和跖屈力量控制的影响
背景:在双重任务条件下,老年人用力的稳定性会受到影响。由于这种障碍是由于老年人的注意力资源有限造成的,因此我们假设肌肉收缩所涉及的大脑皮层活动程度会影响双任务条件下的用力稳定性。为了验证这一假设,在背屈比跖屈需要更多大脑皮层资源的前提下,我们比较了额外的运动和认知任务要求对年轻人和老年人背屈和跖屈收缩时力量稳定性的影响:方法:18 名年轻人和 18 名老年人在进行力追踪任务时,同时施加等长背伸或跖屈力量,并同时进行和不进行(对照组)辅助上肢运动或认知任务:结果:对于老年人的背屈肌和跖屈肌来说,次要上肢运动任务和认知任务都会影响用力的稳定性。虽然对于背屈肌来说,无论次要任务类型如何,额外的任务要求都会对力量稳定性造成类似的损害,但对于足底屈肌来说,次要认知任务比运动任务的损害效应更大:结论:双重任务要求对力量稳定性的影响可能取决于老年人肌肉收缩时大脑皮层活动的程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Experimental Aging Research
Experimental Aging Research 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental Aging Research is a life span developmental and aging journal dealing with research on the aging process from a psychological and psychobiological perspective. It meets the need for a scholarly journal with refereed scientific papers dealing with age differences and age changes at any point in the adult life span. Areas of major focus include experimental psychology, neuropsychology, psychobiology, work research, ergonomics, and behavioral medicine. Original research, book reviews, monographs, and papers covering special topics are published.
期刊最新文献
Association Between Metabolic Disorders and Cognitive Domains in Community-Dwelling Older Adults. Role of Cardiovascular Risk in Associations of Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor with Longitudinal Brain and Cognitive Trajectories in Older Adults. Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain is Associated With Depressive Symptoms in Community-Dwelling Older Adults Independent of Physical Activity. Experimental Aging Research. Predictors of the Disability in Activities of Daily Living in Nursing Home Residents: A Descriptive Study. Effect of Age and Education on Discourse Cohesion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1