Long term safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation prior to chemotherapy treatment in breast cancer patients.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Fertility and sterility Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.014
Moran Shapira, Tal Sella, Myriam Safrai, Evyatar Villain, Dror Lifshitz, Raoul Orvieto, Einav Gal-Yam, Dror Meirow
{"title":"Long term safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation prior to chemotherapy treatment in breast cancer patients.","authors":"Moran Shapira, Tal Sella, Myriam Safrai, Evyatar Villain, Dror Lifshitz, Raoul Orvieto, Einav Gal-Yam, Dror Meirow","doi":"10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the long-term safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation prior to breast cancer chemotherapy treatment DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort SUBJECTS: 213 women aged 18-43 years with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy during 2015-2019. Of those, 74 underwent controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation recipients and 141 did not (controls).</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Invasive disease-free survival, calculated from the time of surgery to the time of detection of breast cancer recurrence or death, whichever came first.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At diagnosis, fertility preservation recipients were significantly younger than controls (32.7 vs 38.5 years), were less likely to be partnered (44.4% vs 90.1%) or parous (38.9% vs 95%) and were more likely to harbor a BRCA germline mutation (36.5% vs 14.2%). Disease characteristics and treatment modalities were comparable between groups, apart from tumor staging, with maximal tumor diameter being over 5 cm in 22.2% of fertility preservation recipients as opposed to 5.7% of controls (P<0.05). Mean follow-up was 60.9 and 65.4 months for fertility preservation recipients and controls, respectively. 5-year-invasive disease free survival was 80% for fertility preservation recipients and 86% for controls (p=0.20). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for statistically significant covariates, invasive disease free survival remained similar between the groups (Hazards Ratio (HR), 0.86, 95CI 0.4-1.87, p = 0.71). Invasive disease free survival rates were not statistically different in clinically relevant subgroups including patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.57, CI 95 0.62-3.99, p=0.34), and those co-treated with tamoxifen during stimulation due to an ER-positive disease (HR 1.66, 95CI 0.67-3.49, p=0.23).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Fertility preservation with controlled ovarian stimulation for patients with breast cancer was not found to impair long-term oncologic outcomes, including in emerging clinically relevant subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12275,"journal":{"name":"Fertility and sterility","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fertility and sterility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.014","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the long-term safety of controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation prior to breast cancer chemotherapy treatment DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort SUBJECTS: 213 women aged 18-43 years with newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy during 2015-2019. Of those, 74 underwent controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation recipients and 141 did not (controls).

Exposure: Controlled ovarian stimulation for fertility preservation MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Invasive disease-free survival, calculated from the time of surgery to the time of detection of breast cancer recurrence or death, whichever came first.

Results: At diagnosis, fertility preservation recipients were significantly younger than controls (32.7 vs 38.5 years), were less likely to be partnered (44.4% vs 90.1%) or parous (38.9% vs 95%) and were more likely to harbor a BRCA germline mutation (36.5% vs 14.2%). Disease characteristics and treatment modalities were comparable between groups, apart from tumor staging, with maximal tumor diameter being over 5 cm in 22.2% of fertility preservation recipients as opposed to 5.7% of controls (P<0.05). Mean follow-up was 60.9 and 65.4 months for fertility preservation recipients and controls, respectively. 5-year-invasive disease free survival was 80% for fertility preservation recipients and 86% for controls (p=0.20). In a multivariate analysis adjusted for statistically significant covariates, invasive disease free survival remained similar between the groups (Hazards Ratio (HR), 0.86, 95CI 0.4-1.87, p = 0.71). Invasive disease free survival rates were not statistically different in clinically relevant subgroups including patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (HR 1.57, CI 95 0.62-3.99, p=0.34), and those co-treated with tamoxifen during stimulation due to an ER-positive disease (HR 1.66, 95CI 0.67-3.49, p=0.23).

Conclusions: Fertility preservation with controlled ovarian stimulation for patients with breast cancer was not found to impair long-term oncologic outcomes, including in emerging clinically relevant subgroups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌患者化疗前为保留生育能力而进行的控制性卵巢刺激的长期安全性。
目的评估乳腺癌化疗前控制性卵巢刺激保留生育力的长期安全性 设计:回顾性观察队列 对象:213名年龄在18-43岁之间、在2015-2019年间接受全身化疗的新诊断I-III期乳腺癌女性。其中,74人接受了保留生育力的控制性卵巢刺激,141人未接受(对照组):主要结局指标:无侵袭性疾病生存期,从手术时间计算到发现乳腺癌复发或死亡时间,以先到者为准:结果:在诊断时,接受生育力保留的患者明显比对照组年轻(32.7 岁对 38.5 岁),有伴侣(44.4% 对 90.1%)或parous(38.9% 对 95%)的可能性较低,而且更有可能携带 BRCA 基因突变(36.5% 对 14.2%)。除肿瘤分期外,各组间的疾病特征和治疗方式相当,22.2%的生育力保留受试者的肿瘤最大直径超过5厘米,而对照组仅为5.7%(PConclusions:研究发现,对乳腺癌患者进行有控制的卵巢刺激以保留生育力不会影响长期肿瘤治疗效果,包括新出现的临床相关亚组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fertility and sterility
Fertility and sterility 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.00%
发文量
1446
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Fertility and Sterility® is an international journal for obstetricians, gynecologists, reproductive endocrinologists, urologists, basic scientists and others who treat and investigate problems of infertility and human reproductive disorders. The journal publishes juried original scientific articles in clinical and laboratory research relevant to reproductive endocrinology, urology, andrology, physiology, immunology, genetics, contraception, and menopause. Fertility and Sterility® encourages and supports meaningful basic and clinical research, and facilitates and promotes excellence in professional education, in the field of reproductive medicine.
期刊最新文献
Human embryos with segmental aneuploidies display delayed early development: a multi-centre morphokinetic analysis. Pharmacological and Surgical Strategies to Improve Cryopreserved Ovarian Tissue Transplantation Longevity and Outcomes. Editorial Board Table of Contents When should assisted reproductive technology workups be performed: following a tiered approach or all on day 1?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1