Risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with zoster-associated neuralgia who underwent interventional pain management.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-10-02 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnmol.2024.1393219
Junpeng Yuan, Youjia Yu, Hong Liu, Huichan Xu, Yan Li, Xiaohong Jin
{"title":"Risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with zoster-associated neuralgia who underwent interventional pain management.","authors":"Junpeng Yuan, Youjia Yu, Hong Liu, Huichan Xu, Yan Li, Xiaohong Jin","doi":"10.3389/fnmol.2024.1393219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Zoster-associated neuralgia (ZAN) is recognized as a challenging neuralgia that often leads to poor prognosis in patients receiving interventional pain management. Identifying risk factors early can enable clinicians to develop personalized treatment plans; however, research in this area is limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively screened all patients with ZAN who received interventional therapy in the Pain Department of Soochow University First Affiliated Hospital from January 1, 2022 to August 31, 2023. Data on patient demographics, medical history, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), clinical scoring, and treatment methods were collected. Interventional therapy included short-term nerve electrical stimulation (st-NES), pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF-TC). Patients were categorized into poor prognosis and control groups based on outcomes 3 months post-discharge. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for poor prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The final analysis included 282 patients. The rate of poor prognosis was 32.6% (92/282). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio, 2.985; 95% confidence interval, 1.449-6.148; <i>p</i> = 0.003), disease duration >3 months (odds ratio, 3.135; 95% confidence interval, 1.685-5.832; <i>p</i> < 0.001), head and face pain (odds ratio, 3.140; 95% confidence interval, 1.557-6.330; <i>p</i> = 0.001), use of immunosuppressants (odds ratio, 2.737; 95% confidence interval, 1.168-6.416; <i>p</i> = 0.021), higher NLR (odds ratio, 1.454; 95% confidence interval, 1.233-1.715; <i>p</i> < 0.001), PRF (st-NES as reference) (odds ratio, 2.324; 95% confidence interval, 1.116-4.844; <i>p</i> = 0.024) and RF-TC (st-NES as reference) (odds ratio, 5.028; 95% confidence interval, 2.139-11.820; <i>p</i> < 0.001) were found to be independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with ZAN who underwent interventional pain management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio, 2.985; 95% confidence interval, 1.449-6.148; <i>p</i> = 0.003), disease duration >3 months (odds ratio, 3.135; 95% confidence interval, 1.685-5.832; <i>p</i> < 0.001), head and face pain (odds ratio, 3.140; 95% confidence interval, 1.557-6.330; <i>p</i> = 0.001), immunosuppressants use (odds ratio, 2.737; 95% confidence interval, 1.168-6.416; <i>p</i> = 0.021), higher NLR (odds ratio, 1.454; 95% confidence interval, 1.233-1.715; <i>p</i> < 0.001), PRF (odds ratio, 2.324; 95% confidence interval, 1.116-4.844; <i>p</i> = 0.024) and RF-TC (odds ratio, 5.028; 95% confidence interval, 2.139-11.820; <i>p</i> < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with ZAN who underwent interventional pain management.</p>","PeriodicalId":12630,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience","volume":"17 ","pages":"1393219"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnmol.2024.1393219","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Zoster-associated neuralgia (ZAN) is recognized as a challenging neuralgia that often leads to poor prognosis in patients receiving interventional pain management. Identifying risk factors early can enable clinicians to develop personalized treatment plans; however, research in this area is limited.

Methods: We retrospectively screened all patients with ZAN who received interventional therapy in the Pain Department of Soochow University First Affiliated Hospital from January 1, 2022 to August 31, 2023. Data on patient demographics, medical history, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), clinical scoring, and treatment methods were collected. Interventional therapy included short-term nerve electrical stimulation (st-NES), pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) and radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RF-TC). Patients were categorized into poor prognosis and control groups based on outcomes 3 months post-discharge. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for poor prognosis.

Results: The final analysis included 282 patients. The rate of poor prognosis was 32.6% (92/282). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio, 2.985; 95% confidence interval, 1.449-6.148; p = 0.003), disease duration >3 months (odds ratio, 3.135; 95% confidence interval, 1.685-5.832; p < 0.001), head and face pain (odds ratio, 3.140; 95% confidence interval, 1.557-6.330; p = 0.001), use of immunosuppressants (odds ratio, 2.737; 95% confidence interval, 1.168-6.416; p = 0.021), higher NLR (odds ratio, 1.454; 95% confidence interval, 1.233-1.715; p < 0.001), PRF (st-NES as reference) (odds ratio, 2.324; 95% confidence interval, 1.116-4.844; p = 0.024) and RF-TC (st-NES as reference) (odds ratio, 5.028; 95% confidence interval, 2.139-11.820; p < 0.001) were found to be independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with ZAN who underwent interventional pain management.

Conclusion: Age ≥ 65 years (odds ratio, 2.985; 95% confidence interval, 1.449-6.148; p = 0.003), disease duration >3 months (odds ratio, 3.135; 95% confidence interval, 1.685-5.832; p < 0.001), head and face pain (odds ratio, 3.140; 95% confidence interval, 1.557-6.330; p = 0.001), immunosuppressants use (odds ratio, 2.737; 95% confidence interval, 1.168-6.416; p = 0.021), higher NLR (odds ratio, 1.454; 95% confidence interval, 1.233-1.715; p < 0.001), PRF (odds ratio, 2.324; 95% confidence interval, 1.116-4.844; p = 0.024) and RF-TC (odds ratio, 5.028; 95% confidence interval, 2.139-11.820; p < 0.001) were identified as independent risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with ZAN who underwent interventional pain management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受介入疼痛治疗的带状疱疹相关神经痛患者预后不良的风险因素。
背景:带状疱疹相关神经痛(ZAN)被认为是一种具有挑战性的神经痛,通常会导致接受介入疼痛治疗的患者预后不良。早期识别风险因素可帮助临床医生制定个性化的治疗方案,但这方面的研究还很有限:我们回顾性地筛选了 2022 年 1 月 1 日至 2023 年 8 月 31 日期间在苏州大学附属第一医院疼痛科接受介入治疗的所有 ZAN 患者。收集了患者的人口统计学、病史、中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)、临床评分和治疗方法等数据。介入治疗包括短期神经电刺激(st-NES)、脉冲射频(PRF)和射频热凝(RF-TC)。根据出院后 3 个月的结果,将患者分为预后不良组和对照组。多变量逻辑回归用于确定预后不良的风险因素:最终分析包括 282 名患者。预后不良率为 32.6%(92/282)。多变量逻辑回归分析显示,年龄≥65 岁(几率比,2.985;95% 置信区间,1.449-6.148;P = 0.003)、病程>3 个月(几率比,3.135;95% 置信区间,1.685-5.832;P = 0.001)、使用免疫抑制剂(几率比,2.737;95% 置信区间,1.168-6.416;P = 0.021)、较高的 NLR(几率比,1.454;95% 置信区间,1.233-1.715;P = 0.024)和 RF-TC(以 st-NES 为参照)(几率比,5.028;95% 置信区间,2.139-11.820;P 结论:年龄≥65 岁(几率比,2.737;95% 置信区间,1.168-6.416;P = 0.021年龄≥65 岁(几率比,2.985;95% 置信区间,1.449-6.148;P = 0.003)、病程>3 个月(几率比,3.135;95% 置信区间,1.685-5.832;P = 0.001)、使用免疫抑制剂(几率比,2.737;95% 置信区间,1.168-6.416;P = 0.021)、较高的 NLR(几率比,1.454;95% 置信区间,1.233-1.715;P P = 0.024)和 RF-TC(几率比,5.028;95% 置信区间,2.139-11.820;P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
669
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience is a first-tier electronic journal devoted to identifying key molecules, as well as their functions and interactions, that underlie the structure, design and function of the brain across all levels. The scope of our journal encompasses synaptic and cellular proteins, coding and non-coding RNA, and molecular mechanisms regulating cellular and dendritic RNA translation. In recent years, a plethora of new cellular and synaptic players have been identified from reduced systems, such as neuronal cultures, but the relevance of these molecules in terms of cellular and synaptic function and plasticity in the living brain and its circuits has not been validated. The effects of spine growth and density observed using gene products identified from in vitro work are frequently not reproduced in vivo. Our journal is particularly interested in studies on genetically engineered model organisms (C. elegans, Drosophila, mouse), in which alterations in key molecules underlying cellular and synaptic function and plasticity produce defined anatomical, physiological and behavioral changes. In the mouse, genetic alterations limited to particular neural circuits (olfactory bulb, motor cortex, cortical layers, hippocampal subfields, cerebellum), preferably regulated in time and on demand, are of special interest, as they sidestep potential compensatory developmental effects.
期刊最新文献
Uncovering novel KCC2 regulatory motifs through a comprehensive transposon-based mutant library. Novel strategies targeting mitochondria-lysosome contact sites for the treatment of neurological diseases. Editorial: Oxytosis/ferroptosis: unraveling the mechanisms and its multifaceted role in neurodegenerative diseases. Neurotherapeutic impact of vanillic acid and ibudilast on the cuprizone model of multiple sclerosis. Serum metabolomic signatures of patients with rare neurogenetic diseases: an insight into potential biomarkers and treatment targets.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1