{"title":"Influence of Image Discretization and Patch Size on Microbubble Localization Precision.","authors":"Julia Sobolewski, Stefanie Dencks, Georg Schmitz","doi":"10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3479710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For ultrasound localization microscopy, the localization of microbubbles (MBs) is an essential part to obtain super-resolved maps of the vasculature. This paper analyzes the impact of image discretization and patch size on the precision of different MB localization methods to reconcile different observations from previous studies, provide an estimate of feasible localization precision, and derive guidelines for an optimal parameter selection. For this purpose, images of MBs were simulated with Gaussian point-spread functions (PSF) of varying width parameter σ at randomly generated subpixel positions, and Rician distributed noise was added. Four localization methods were tested on patches of different sizes (number of pixels N × N): Gaussian fit, radial symmetry method, calculation of center of mass, and peak detection. Additionally, the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for the given estimation problem was calculated. Our results show that the localization precision is strongly influenced by the ratio of the PSF width parameter σ to the pixel size Δ, as well as the patch size N. The best parameter combination depends on the localization method. Generally, very small σ/Δ ratios as well as large σ/Δ ratios in combination with small N lead to performance degradation. The Gaussian fit as representative of a model-based fit comes close to the CRLB and always performs best for the σ/Δ ratios given by image discretization if N is adapted to the PSF. To achieve good results with the Gaussian fit and the radial symmetry method, a good rule of thumb is to set the pixel sizes Δ ≤ σ/0.6 and the patch sizes N ≥ 2σ/Δ + 3.</p>","PeriodicalId":13322,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","volume":"PP ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TUFFC.2024.3479710","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For ultrasound localization microscopy, the localization of microbubbles (MBs) is an essential part to obtain super-resolved maps of the vasculature. This paper analyzes the impact of image discretization and patch size on the precision of different MB localization methods to reconcile different observations from previous studies, provide an estimate of feasible localization precision, and derive guidelines for an optimal parameter selection. For this purpose, images of MBs were simulated with Gaussian point-spread functions (PSF) of varying width parameter σ at randomly generated subpixel positions, and Rician distributed noise was added. Four localization methods were tested on patches of different sizes (number of pixels N × N): Gaussian fit, radial symmetry method, calculation of center of mass, and peak detection. Additionally, the Cramér-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for the given estimation problem was calculated. Our results show that the localization precision is strongly influenced by the ratio of the PSF width parameter σ to the pixel size Δ, as well as the patch size N. The best parameter combination depends on the localization method. Generally, very small σ/Δ ratios as well as large σ/Δ ratios in combination with small N lead to performance degradation. The Gaussian fit as representative of a model-based fit comes close to the CRLB and always performs best for the σ/Δ ratios given by image discretization if N is adapted to the PSF. To achieve good results with the Gaussian fit and the radial symmetry method, a good rule of thumb is to set the pixel sizes Δ ≤ σ/0.6 and the patch sizes N ≥ 2σ/Δ + 3.
期刊介绍:
IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control includes the theory, technology, materials, and applications relating to: (1) the generation, transmission, and detection of ultrasonic waves and related phenomena; (2) medical ultrasound, including hyperthermia, bioeffects, tissue characterization and imaging; (3) ferroelectric, piezoelectric, and piezomagnetic materials, including crystals, polycrystalline solids, films, polymers, and composites; (4) frequency control, timing and time distribution, including crystal oscillators and other means of classical frequency control, and atomic, molecular and laser frequency control standards. Areas of interest range from fundamental studies to the design and/or applications of devices and systems.