Prehospital management and outcomes of patients calling with chest pain as the main complaint.

IF 2 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE International Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1186/s12245-024-00745-8
Sughra Ahmed, Filip Gnesin, Helle Collatz Christensen, Stig Nikolaj Blomberg, Fredrik Folke, Kristian Kragholm, Henrik Bøggild, Freddy Lippert, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Amalie Lykkemark Møller
{"title":"Prehospital management and outcomes of patients calling with chest pain as the main complaint.","authors":"Sughra Ahmed, Filip Gnesin, Helle Collatz Christensen, Stig Nikolaj Blomberg, Fredrik Folke, Kristian Kragholm, Henrik Bøggild, Freddy Lippert, Christian Torp-Pedersen, Amalie Lykkemark Møller","doi":"10.1186/s12245-024-00745-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chest pain is a frequent cause of health care contacts. We examined the prehospital management, in-hospital discharge diagnoses, and mortality of patients calling a non-emergency and emergency medical service with chest pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services (EMS) consists of a non-emergency medical helpline (calls to 1813) and emergency medical service (1-1-2 calls). We included all calls to the Copenhagen EMS with a primary complaint of chest pain from 2014 to 2018 in Copenhagen, Denmark. The outcomes were: emergency response (ambulance dispatch, other transports/self-transport/home visits, self-care, and unknown/cancelled response), in-hospital diagnosis within 7 days after the call (cardiovascular, pulmonary, or other non-cardiovascular/pulmonary) and 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,834,071 calls, 91,671 were registered with chest pain at the Copenhagen EMS. The first call for each patient was kept for analysis (n = 66,762). In total, 91.4% were referred to the hospital, 75.8% (n = 50,627) received an ambulance and 15.6% (n = 10,383) received other transport/self-transport/home visits. Overall, 26.9% (n = 17,937) were diagnosed with a cardiovascular disease, 5.2% (n = 3,490) a pulmonary disease, 52.8% (n = 35.242) other non-cardiovascular/pulmonary disease, and 15.1% (n = 10,093) received no diagnosis. Among ambulance-transported patients, the prevalence of cardiovascular discharge diagnoses was higher (32.1%) and fewer received no diagnosis (11.0%). Cardiovascular disease was less prevalent among patients not transported by ambulance and patients not referred to hospital at all (2-13.4%) and in patients ≤ 40 years of age (< 10%). The 30-day mortality was below 5% regardless of diagnosis (0.6-4%), and 65,704 (98.4%) were still alive 30 days later.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nearly all patients calling with chest pain were referred for treatment. Among ambulance-transported patients, around half of the patients did not have a cardiovascular/pulmonary disease. While current practices appear reasonable, improved differentiation of chest pain patients in telephone consultations could potentially both improve the treatment and management of these patients and reduce the in-hospital burden of non-acute chest pain consultations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13967,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":"17 1","pages":"158"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11487892/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00745-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chest pain is a frequent cause of health care contacts. We examined the prehospital management, in-hospital discharge diagnoses, and mortality of patients calling a non-emergency and emergency medical service with chest pain.

Methods: The Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services (EMS) consists of a non-emergency medical helpline (calls to 1813) and emergency medical service (1-1-2 calls). We included all calls to the Copenhagen EMS with a primary complaint of chest pain from 2014 to 2018 in Copenhagen, Denmark. The outcomes were: emergency response (ambulance dispatch, other transports/self-transport/home visits, self-care, and unknown/cancelled response), in-hospital diagnosis within 7 days after the call (cardiovascular, pulmonary, or other non-cardiovascular/pulmonary) and 30-day mortality.

Results: Among 4,834,071 calls, 91,671 were registered with chest pain at the Copenhagen EMS. The first call for each patient was kept for analysis (n = 66,762). In total, 91.4% were referred to the hospital, 75.8% (n = 50,627) received an ambulance and 15.6% (n = 10,383) received other transport/self-transport/home visits. Overall, 26.9% (n = 17,937) were diagnosed with a cardiovascular disease, 5.2% (n = 3,490) a pulmonary disease, 52.8% (n = 35.242) other non-cardiovascular/pulmonary disease, and 15.1% (n = 10,093) received no diagnosis. Among ambulance-transported patients, the prevalence of cardiovascular discharge diagnoses was higher (32.1%) and fewer received no diagnosis (11.0%). Cardiovascular disease was less prevalent among patients not transported by ambulance and patients not referred to hospital at all (2-13.4%) and in patients ≤ 40 years of age (< 10%). The 30-day mortality was below 5% regardless of diagnosis (0.6-4%), and 65,704 (98.4%) were still alive 30 days later.

Conclusion: Nearly all patients calling with chest pain were referred for treatment. Among ambulance-transported patients, around half of the patients did not have a cardiovascular/pulmonary disease. While current practices appear reasonable, improved differentiation of chest pain patients in telephone consultations could potentially both improve the treatment and management of these patients and reduce the in-hospital burden of non-acute chest pain consultations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以胸痛为主诉的患者的院前管理和治疗效果。
背景:胸痛是人们接触医疗服务的一个常见原因。我们研究了因胸痛致电非急诊和急诊医疗服务的患者的院前处理、出院诊断和死亡率:哥本哈根紧急医疗服务(EMS)由非紧急医疗求助热线(拨打 1813)和紧急医疗服务(1-1-2)组成。我们纳入了 2014 年至 2018 年丹麦哥本哈根所有以胸痛为主要主诉的哥本哈根紧急医疗服务呼叫。结果包括:急救响应(救护车派遣、其他转运/自行转运/家访、自我护理和未知/取消响应)、呼叫后7天内的院内诊断(心血管、肺部或其他非心血管/肺部)和30天死亡率:在 4,834,071 次呼叫中,有 91,671 次在哥本哈根急救中心登记为胸痛。每位患者的第一次呼叫都被保留下来进行分析(n = 66,762)。总共有 91.4% 的患者被转诊到医院,75.8%(n = 50627)的患者接受了救护车救治,15.6%(n = 10383)的患者接受了其他交通/自行转运/家访。总体而言,26.9%(n = 17,937 人)被诊断为心血管疾病,5.2%(n = 3,490 人)被诊断为肺部疾病,52.8%(n = 35,242 人)被诊断为其他非心血管/肺部疾病,15.1%(n = 10,093 人)未被诊断。在救护车转运的患者中,心血管疾病出院诊断率较高(32.1%),而未获得诊断的患者较少(11.0%)。心血管疾病在未被救护车转运的患者、未被转诊到医院的患者(2%-13.4%)和年龄小于 40 岁的患者中发病率较低(结论:心血管疾病在未被救护车转运的患者和未被转诊到医院的患者中发病率较低):几乎所有因胸痛就诊的患者都被转诊治疗。在救护车转送的患者中,约有一半没有心血管/肺部疾病。虽然目前的做法似乎合理,但在电话会诊中对胸痛患者进行更好的区分可能会改善这些患者的治疗和管理,并减轻非急性胸痛会诊的院内负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to bring to light the various clinical advancements and research developments attained over the world and thus help the specialty forge ahead. It is directed towards physicians and medical personnel undergoing training or working within the field of Emergency Medicine. Medical students who are interested in pursuing a career in Emergency Medicine will also benefit from the journal. This is particularly useful for trainees in countries where the specialty is still in its infancy. Disciplines covered will include interesting clinical cases, the latest evidence-based practice and research developments in Emergency medicine including emergency pediatrics.
期刊最新文献
Successful transcatheter treatment of large right pulmonary artery to left atrial fistula: a case series and literature review. Airway, breathing, cellphone: a new vital sign? Impact of online expert interview-based research training on medical trainees' knowledge and confidence: a mixed-methods design. Fundamentals of emergency care support: a blended learning model to improve emergency and trauma care in a low-income country. Unveiling three accessory spleens in one patient: a rare case report and literature review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1