Suspected Pseudobulbar Affect in Neurodegenerative Disease

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.1002/gps.70002
Maureen K. O’Connor, Brandon Frank, Renée DeCaro, Ana Vives-Rodriguez, Landon Hurley, Katherine W. Turk, Andrew E. Budson
{"title":"Suspected Pseudobulbar Affect in Neurodegenerative Disease","authors":"Maureen K. O’Connor,&nbsp;Brandon Frank,&nbsp;Renée DeCaro,&nbsp;Ana Vives-Rodriguez,&nbsp;Landon Hurley,&nbsp;Katherine W. Turk,&nbsp;Andrew E. Budson","doi":"10.1002/gps.70002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To investigate the association between suspected pseudobulbar affect (PBA), clinical diagnosis, cognitive testing, and self-reported mood in older adults presenting for evaluation of dementia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>Patients presenting to an outpatient memory disorders clinic (<i>N</i> = 311).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used traditional and novel network modeling approaches to examine associations between neuropsychological (NP) tests, patient and clinician rating scales, and the Center for Neurological Study-Lability Scale (CNS-LS) among patients with suspected AD (<i>n</i> = 133) and other neurocognitive diagnosis (<i>n</i> = 178). We then examined differences in test performance between patients with and without suspected PBA (CNS-LS cut-off of ≥ 13), while accounting for demographic and psychiatric covariates with propensity score matching. Group differences were assessed with Bayesian models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Prevalence of suspected PBA in AD was slightly less than half (44.4%) and at a similar rate in other dementias (e.g., 46.9% in CVD and 45.5% in LBD). In network models, the CNS-LS was associated with higher anxiety and better word list recall. After accounting for covariates, AD patients with suspected PBA performed better on word list recall <i>β</i><sub><i>M</i></sub> = 0.40, 95% CI [0.15, 0.66], and committed fewer false positive errors on recognition <i>β</i><sub><i>M</i></sub> = −1.51, 95% CI [−2.34, −0.59] than AD patients without suspected PBA. There were no differences in patients with any other diagnostic impression, nor group differences on other NP measures.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Patients with suspected PBA and AD diagnosis had better memory recall and recognition than those without suspected PBA, suggesting that impaired emotional regulation may be an early sign of AD in patients with less prominent memory decline. Better understanding PBA in neurodegenerative diseases, including prevalence and comorbidity with psychiatric conditions, could help with early identification, education, and initiation of treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14060,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"39 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/gps.70002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the association between suspected pseudobulbar affect (PBA), clinical diagnosis, cognitive testing, and self-reported mood in older adults presenting for evaluation of dementia.

Participants

Patients presenting to an outpatient memory disorders clinic (N = 311).

Methods

We used traditional and novel network modeling approaches to examine associations between neuropsychological (NP) tests, patient and clinician rating scales, and the Center for Neurological Study-Lability Scale (CNS-LS) among patients with suspected AD (n = 133) and other neurocognitive diagnosis (n = 178). We then examined differences in test performance between patients with and without suspected PBA (CNS-LS cut-off of ≥ 13), while accounting for demographic and psychiatric covariates with propensity score matching. Group differences were assessed with Bayesian models.

Results

Prevalence of suspected PBA in AD was slightly less than half (44.4%) and at a similar rate in other dementias (e.g., 46.9% in CVD and 45.5% in LBD). In network models, the CNS-LS was associated with higher anxiety and better word list recall. After accounting for covariates, AD patients with suspected PBA performed better on word list recall βM = 0.40, 95% CI [0.15, 0.66], and committed fewer false positive errors on recognition βM = −1.51, 95% CI [−2.34, −0.59] than AD patients without suspected PBA. There were no differences in patients with any other diagnostic impression, nor group differences on other NP measures.

Conclusions

Patients with suspected PBA and AD diagnosis had better memory recall and recognition than those without suspected PBA, suggesting that impaired emotional regulation may be an early sign of AD in patients with less prominent memory decline. Better understanding PBA in neurodegenerative diseases, including prevalence and comorbidity with psychiatric conditions, could help with early identification, education, and initiation of treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经退行性疾病中的疑似假性勃起功能障碍
目的调查前来评估痴呆症的老年人中疑似假性球形情感(PBA)、临床诊断、认知测试和自我报告的情绪之间的关联:在记忆障碍门诊就诊的患者(N = 311):我们采用传统和新型网络建模方法,研究了疑似 AD 患者(133 人)和其他神经认知诊断患者(178 人)的神经心理学(NP)测试、患者和临床医生评分量表以及神经研究中心易感性量表(CNS-LS)之间的关联。然后,我们研究了疑似 PBA(CNS-LS 临界值≥ 13)患者和未疑似 PBA(CNS-LS 临界值≥ 13)患者之间测试表现的差异,同时利用倾向得分匹配法考虑了人口统计学和精神病学协变量。用贝叶斯模型评估了组间差异:结果:疑似PBA的发病率在AD中略低于一半(44.4%),在其他痴呆症中的发病率相似(如在CVD中为46.9%,在LBD中为45.5%)。在网络模型中,CNS-LS 与焦虑程度较高和单词表回忆能力较强有关。在考虑了协变量后,与没有疑似PBA的AD患者相比,疑似PBA的AD患者在单词表回忆中的表现更好 βM = 0.40, 95% CI [0.15, 0.66],在识别中的假阳性错误更少 βM = -1.51, 95% CI [-2.34, -0.59]。在其他诊断印象上,患者之间没有差异,在其他NP测量上也没有组间差异:结论:与没有疑似PBA的AD患者相比,疑似PBA和AD诊断患者的记忆回忆和识别能力更强,这表明在记忆力下降不明显的患者中,情绪调节能力受损可能是AD的早期征兆。更好地了解神经退行性疾病中的PBA,包括发病率和与精神疾病的合并症,有助于早期识别、教育和开始治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The rapidly increasing world population of aged people has led to a growing need to focus attention on the problems of mental disorder in late life. The aim of the Journal is to communicate the results of original research in the causes, treatment and care of all forms of mental disorder which affect the elderly. The Journal is of interest to psychiatrists, psychologists, social scientists, nurses and others engaged in therapeutic professions, together with general neurobiological researchers. The Journal provides an international perspective on the important issue of geriatric psychiatry, and contributions are published from countries throughout the world. Topics covered include epidemiology of mental disorders in old age, clinical aetiological research, post-mortem pathological and neurochemical studies, treatment trials and evaluation of geriatric psychiatry services.
期刊最新文献
Validation of the Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Screen in an American Sample of Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Mild Dementia Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 in the Pathophysiology of Late Life Depression Exploring Determinants of Institutionalization Among Germany's Oldest Old Female Reproductive Period Length, Parity and Hormonal Replacement Therapy and Dementia: The Elsi-Brazil Study ApoE Gene Polymorphism and Clinical, Biochemical, and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Alzheimer's Disease Patients From Northern and Southern Regions of Kazakhstan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1