A cross-sectional survey of prehabilitation among surgeons and anesthesiologists.

Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1186/s40981-024-00749-6
Mariko Sato, Mitsuru Ida, Shohei Nakatani, Masahiko Kawaguchi
{"title":"A cross-sectional survey of prehabilitation among surgeons and anesthesiologists.","authors":"Mariko Sato, Mitsuru Ida, Shohei Nakatani, Masahiko Kawaguchi","doi":"10.1186/s40981-024-00749-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prehabilitation, which includes nutritional and exercise therapies, is recommended for patients before surgery to improve physical and cognitive functions. This study aimed to identify the awareness, understanding, and issues among surgeons and anesthesiologists regarding the implementation of prehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a survey on prehabilitation targeting surgeons and anesthesiologists working at a university hospital and two private hospitals. The survey collection period was set for 1 month, commencing on February 5, 2024. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the characteristics of the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 254 surgeons and 49 anesthesiologists from three hospitals participated, with a response rate of 61.7%. Regarding the understanding of prehabilitation, 16.7% of anesthesiologists and only 2% of surgeons had a good grasp of its content. When enquired about the necessity of prehabilitation, 100% of anesthesiologists indicated it as necessary or somewhat necessary, whereas 98.7% of surgeons responded similarly. Several barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation were identified, with the most common reason being the busy schedule of outpatient services.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights that while both surgeons and anesthesiologists recognize the importance of prehabilitation, significant challenges exist in its practical implementation. This underscores the need for simple explanatory tools for patients, the introduction of remote care options, and simple orders to relevant departments, which are essential and require multidisciplinary collaboration.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11480281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40981-024-00749-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prehabilitation, which includes nutritional and exercise therapies, is recommended for patients before surgery to improve physical and cognitive functions. This study aimed to identify the awareness, understanding, and issues among surgeons and anesthesiologists regarding the implementation of prehabilitation.

Methods: We conducted a survey on prehabilitation targeting surgeons and anesthesiologists working at a university hospital and two private hospitals. The survey collection period was set for 1 month, commencing on February 5, 2024. Descriptive statistics were employed to summarize the characteristics of the participants.

Results: A total of 254 surgeons and 49 anesthesiologists from three hospitals participated, with a response rate of 61.7%. Regarding the understanding of prehabilitation, 16.7% of anesthesiologists and only 2% of surgeons had a good grasp of its content. When enquired about the necessity of prehabilitation, 100% of anesthesiologists indicated it as necessary or somewhat necessary, whereas 98.7% of surgeons responded similarly. Several barriers to the implementation of prehabilitation were identified, with the most common reason being the busy schedule of outpatient services.

Conclusion: This study highlights that while both surgeons and anesthesiologists recognize the importance of prehabilitation, significant challenges exist in its practical implementation. This underscores the need for simple explanatory tools for patients, the introduction of remote care options, and simple orders to relevant departments, which are essential and require multidisciplinary collaboration.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
对外科医生和麻醉师进行的康复前横断面调查。
背景:建议患者在手术前进行包括营养和运动疗法在内的术前康复,以改善身体和认知功能。本研究旨在了解外科医生和麻醉师对实施术前康复的认识、理解和问题:我们对一家大学医院和两家私立医院的外科医生和麻醉师进行了一次关于术前康复的调查。调查收集期为 1 个月,从 2024 年 2 月 5 日开始。采用描述性统计方法总结了参与者的特征:共有来自三家医院的 254 名外科医生和 49 名麻醉师参与了调查,回复率为 61.7%。在对预康复的理解方面,16.7%的麻醉师和仅 2%的外科医生能很好地掌握预康复的内容。当被问及是否有必要进行术前康复时,100% 的麻醉科医生表示有必要或有一定必要,而 98.7% 的外科医生也做出了类似回答。研究发现了实施术前康复的几个障碍,其中最常见的原因是门诊服务日程繁忙:本研究强调,虽然外科医生和麻醉科医生都认识到了预康复的重要性,但在实际实施过程中却面临着巨大的挑战。这凸显了为患者提供简单的解释工具、引入远程护理方案以及向相关部门下达简单指令的必要性,这些都需要多学科合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1