Left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block and mild to moderately reduced left ventricular systolic function.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology Pub Date : 2024-10-16 DOI:10.1111/jce.16434
Hiroyuki Kato, Toshiaki Sato, Kenji Shimeno, Shinji Mito, Taku Nishida, Kyoko Soejima
{"title":"Left bundle branch area pacing for atrioventricular block and mild to moderately reduced left ventricular systolic function.","authors":"Hiroyuki Kato, Toshiaki Sato, Kenji Shimeno, Shinji Mito, Taku Nishida, Kyoko Soejima","doi":"10.1111/jce.16434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The clinical efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has not been fully elucidated in patients with atrioventricular block and mild to moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study evaluated the impact of LBBAP on patients with an LVEF of ≤50% and dependent on ventricular pacing.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Thirty-seven patients with atrioventricular block underwent successful LBBAP. All patients had a reduced LVEF of 36%-50% and underwent pacemaker implantation. Ventricular pacing was performed using the LBBAP alone throughout the follow-up period. Clinical outcomes, including death from any cause, fatal ventricular arrhythmias, hospitalization for heart failure, and echocardiographic improvements after 1 year, were assessed. Thirty-three (89%) patients were free from the composite endpoint during a median follow-up of 36 months, whereas four patients experienced noncardiovascular deaths or hospitalization for heart failure. No fatal ventricular arrhythmias occurred. LVEF was improved using LBBAP from 42.6 ± 4.7% to 52.1 ± 9.1% (p < .001). LVEF normalization (>50%) was achieved in 64.5% of patients, while in 11 patients LVEF remained stable demonstrating no deterioration (from 42.5 ± 4.7% to 42.4 ± 6.3%). Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (odds ratio, 21.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.96-236.45) and Pre-existing bundle branch block (odds ratio, 11.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-125.75) were independent preoperative predictors of LVEF normalization using LBBAP.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LBBAP significantly improved cardiac systolic dysfunction without causing fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Moreover, LBBAP may provide a promising alternative to biventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and a reduced LVEF of 36%-50%.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The clinical efficacy of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has not been fully elucidated in patients with atrioventricular block and mild to moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study evaluated the impact of LBBAP on patients with an LVEF of ≤50% and dependent on ventricular pacing.

Methods and results: Thirty-seven patients with atrioventricular block underwent successful LBBAP. All patients had a reduced LVEF of 36%-50% and underwent pacemaker implantation. Ventricular pacing was performed using the LBBAP alone throughout the follow-up period. Clinical outcomes, including death from any cause, fatal ventricular arrhythmias, hospitalization for heart failure, and echocardiographic improvements after 1 year, were assessed. Thirty-three (89%) patients were free from the composite endpoint during a median follow-up of 36 months, whereas four patients experienced noncardiovascular deaths or hospitalization for heart failure. No fatal ventricular arrhythmias occurred. LVEF was improved using LBBAP from 42.6 ± 4.7% to 52.1 ± 9.1% (p < .001). LVEF normalization (>50%) was achieved in 64.5% of patients, while in 11 patients LVEF remained stable demonstrating no deterioration (from 42.5 ± 4.7% to 42.4 ± 6.3%). Nonischemic cardiomyopathy (odds ratio, 21.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.96-236.45) and Pre-existing bundle branch block (odds ratio, 11.79; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-125.75) were independent preoperative predictors of LVEF normalization using LBBAP.

Conclusion: LBBAP significantly improved cardiac systolic dysfunction without causing fatal ventricular arrhythmias. Moreover, LBBAP may provide a promising alternative to biventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and a reduced LVEF of 36%-50%.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左束支区起搏治疗房室传导阻滞和左心室收缩功能轻度至中度减退。
导言:左束支区起搏(LBBAP)对房室传导阻滞和左室射血分数(LVEF)轻度至中度降低患者的临床疗效尚未完全阐明。本研究评估了 LBBAP 对 LVEF≤50% 并依赖心室起搏的患者的影响:37 名房室传导阻滞患者成功接受了 LBBAP。所有患者的 LVEF 均降至 36%-50%,并接受了起搏器植入术。在整个随访期间,仅使用 LBBAP 进行心室起搏。对临床结果进行了评估,包括任何原因导致的死亡、致命性室性心律失常、因心力衰竭住院以及一年后超声心动图的改善。33名患者(89%)在中位随访36个月期间未出现综合终点,4名患者出现非心血管死亡或因心衰住院。没有发生致命性室性心律失常。64.5%的患者使用 LBBAP 后 LVEF 从 42.6 ± 4.7% 提高到 52.1 ± 9.1%(P 50%),11 例患者的 LVEF 保持稳定,没有恶化(从 42.5 ± 4.7% 到 42.4 ± 6.3%)。非缺血性心肌病(几率比,21.52;95% 置信区间,1.96-236.45)和原有束支传导阻滞(几率比,11.79;95% 置信区间,1.11-125.75)是使用 LBBAP 术前预测 LVEF 恢复正常的独立因素:结论:LBBAP能明显改善心脏收缩功能障碍,且不会导致致命性室性心律失常。此外,对于房室传导阻滞且 LVEF 降低至 36%-50% 的患者,LBBAP 可作为双心室起搏的替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of palpitations in patients with frequent premature ventricular contractions. Body mass index as a determinant of scar formation post-AF ablation: Insights from DECAAF II. Efficacy and limitation of nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Frequency and Genotype-Dependence of intrinsic chronotropic insufficiency among patients with congenital long QT syndrome. Endocardial ablation of ganglionated plexus for the treatment of carotid sinus syndrome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1