Effects of educational intervention based on childbirth scenarios on fear of childbirth in primiparous women.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-08-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_870_23
Farnaz Shaliha, Fatemeh Jafarzadeh-Kenarsari, Zahra Bostani-Khalesi, Saman Maroufizadeh, Zainab Alimoradi
{"title":"Effects of educational intervention based on childbirth scenarios on fear of childbirth in primiparous women.","authors":"Farnaz Shaliha, Fatemeh Jafarzadeh-Kenarsari, Zahra Bostani-Khalesi, Saman Maroufizadeh, Zainab Alimoradi","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_870_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fear of childbirth (FOC) is one of the common reasons for choosing cesarean delivery without medical indications. The present study aimed to assess the effect of childbirth scenario-based educational intervention on FOC in primiparous women.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was conducted on 72 primiparous women attending comprehensive health care centers in Qazvin, Iran, in 2021. Participants were randomly placed in the control group (<i>n</i> = 38) and the intervention group (<i>n</i> = 34). The participants in the intervention group read the booklet of childbirth scenarios once a week for eight weeks. Data were collected using the demographic-fertility questionnaire and the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) before the intervention, eight weeks after the intervention, and the first week after delivery. Data analysis was carried out using independent <i>t</i>-test, Chi-square, Fisher's exact, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By controlling the FOC scores before the intervention, the mean total FOC scores eight weeks after the intervention and in the first week after delivery in the intervention group were significantly 34 units (95% CI: 27.3-40.7) and 22.9 units (95% CI: 14.6-31.1) lower than the control group respectively (<i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on the results, childbirth scenario-based intervention can effectively reduce FOC among primiparous women. Healthcare providers, especially midwives, can benefit from applying childbirth scenario-based intervention in prenatal care to reduce the FOC of pregnant women.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"13 ","pages":"291"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11482358/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_870_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fear of childbirth (FOC) is one of the common reasons for choosing cesarean delivery without medical indications. The present study aimed to assess the effect of childbirth scenario-based educational intervention on FOC in primiparous women.

Materials and methods: This study was conducted on 72 primiparous women attending comprehensive health care centers in Qazvin, Iran, in 2021. Participants were randomly placed in the control group (n = 38) and the intervention group (n = 34). The participants in the intervention group read the booklet of childbirth scenarios once a week for eight weeks. Data were collected using the demographic-fertility questionnaire and the Wijma Delivery Expectancy/Experience Questionnaire (W-DEQ) before the intervention, eight weeks after the intervention, and the first week after delivery. Data analysis was carried out using independent t-test, Chi-square, Fisher's exact, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA), and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA).

Results: By controlling the FOC scores before the intervention, the mean total FOC scores eight weeks after the intervention and in the first week after delivery in the intervention group were significantly 34 units (95% CI: 27.3-40.7) and 22.9 units (95% CI: 14.6-31.1) lower than the control group respectively (P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Based on the results, childbirth scenario-based intervention can effectively reduce FOC among primiparous women. Healthcare providers, especially midwives, can benefit from applying childbirth scenario-based intervention in prenatal care to reduce the FOC of pregnant women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于分娩情景的教育干预对初产妇分娩恐惧的影响。
背景:对分娩的恐惧(FOC)是在没有医学指征的情况下选择剖宫产的常见原因之一。本研究旨在评估分娩情景教育干预对初产妇分娩恐惧的影响:本研究的对象是 2021 年在伊朗加兹温市综合医疗保健中心就诊的 72 名初产妇。参与者被随机分为对照组(38 人)和干预组(34 人)。干预组的参与者每周阅读一次分娩情景手册,为期八周。在干预前、干预八周后和分娩后第一周,使用人口生育调查问卷和威玛分娩预期/体验问卷(W-DEQ)收集数据。数据分析采用独立 t 检验、卡方检验、费雪精确检验、重复测量方差分析(ANOVA)和协方差分析(ANCOVA):通过控制干预前的 FOC 评分,干预组在干预八周后和分娩后第一周的平均 FOC 总分分别比对照组显著低 34 个单位(95% CI:27.3-40.7)和 22.9 个单位(95% CI:14.6-31.1)(P <0.001):根据研究结果,分娩情景干预可有效降低初产妇的无痛分娩率。医护人员,尤其是助产士,可以在产前护理中应用分娩情景干预,以降低孕妇的FOC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
"The feedback dilemma"-provider and learner perspectives regarding the barriers and facilitators for giving and receiving feedback in medical education: A parallel mixed methods approach. Appraisal the structure of diabetes self-management education and support in diabetes education units of Isfahan, Iran. Assessing the relationship between dyslexia, psychological distress, and academic self-efficacy among Nigerian university undergraduates. Assessment of self-satisfaction, happiness, and quality of life (QoL) among adults: An online survey. Attitude of the health team to the infant home care plan during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1