Evidence on the effectiveness of value-based payment schemes implemented in a hospital setting: A systematic review.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-08-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_873_23
Shahriyar Mokhtary, Ali Janati, Mahmood Yousefi, Behzad Raei
{"title":"Evidence on the effectiveness of value-based payment schemes implemented in a hospital setting: A systematic review.","authors":"Shahriyar Mokhtary, Ali Janati, Mahmood Yousefi, Behzad Raei","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_873_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Value-based payment is among payment models rewarding health care providers for achieving pre-defined targets of quality or efficiency measures of care. This paper aims to identify the evidence of the effectiveness of value-based payment schemes implemented in hospital settings. A systematic review of databases for studies published from 2000 to 2022 that evaluated VBP programs was conducted. We searched four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Sciences in July 2023. Studies were screened and assessed for eligibility. A thematic analysis approach was used to synthesize and summarize the findings. Overall, 29 articles looking into the VBP programs have been included. Most articles describe the effects on the outcome of care (<i>n</i> = 18). The findings of a great deal of evidence in this field show that VBP is not correlated with some outcome measures including hospital-acquired conditions, 30-day mortality, mortality trends, as well as mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction or heart failure. Only three of 12 studies have revealed a positive relationship between a P4P program and efficiency. Seven studies from the United States (US) found no evidence or mixed findings on the effects of P4P on efficiency. The magnitude of the effects of VBP on healthcare quality, patient experience, and costs has often been small and non-significant. The unintended negative impact of incentives in value-based payment on hospitals should be tackled when adopting policies and decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"13 ","pages":"327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11488785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_873_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Value-based payment is among payment models rewarding health care providers for achieving pre-defined targets of quality or efficiency measures of care. This paper aims to identify the evidence of the effectiveness of value-based payment schemes implemented in hospital settings. A systematic review of databases for studies published from 2000 to 2022 that evaluated VBP programs was conducted. We searched four databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Sciences in July 2023. Studies were screened and assessed for eligibility. A thematic analysis approach was used to synthesize and summarize the findings. Overall, 29 articles looking into the VBP programs have been included. Most articles describe the effects on the outcome of care (n = 18). The findings of a great deal of evidence in this field show that VBP is not correlated with some outcome measures including hospital-acquired conditions, 30-day mortality, mortality trends, as well as mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction or heart failure. Only three of 12 studies have revealed a positive relationship between a P4P program and efficiency. Seven studies from the United States (US) found no evidence or mixed findings on the effects of P4P on efficiency. The magnitude of the effects of VBP on healthcare quality, patient experience, and costs has often been small and non-significant. The unintended negative impact of incentives in value-based payment on hospitals should be tackled when adopting policies and decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在医院环境中实施以价值为基础的支付计划的有效性证据:系统综述。
以价值为基础的支付是一种支付模式,对达到预定的医疗质量或效率指标的医疗服务提供者给予奖励。本文旨在确定在医院环境中实施基于价值的支付计划的有效性证据。我们对数据库中 2000 年至 2022 年间发表的评估价值付费计划的研究进行了系统性回顾。我们在 2023 年 7 月检索了四个数据库,包括 PubMed、Scopus、Embase 和 Web of Sciences。对研究进行了筛选和资格评估。我们采用专题分析方法对研究结果进行了归纳和总结。共有 29 篇研究 VBP 计划的文章被收录。大多数文章描述了对护理结果的影响(n = 18)。该领域大量证据的研究结果表明,VBP 与一些结果指标并不相关,包括医院获得性病症、30 天死亡率、死亡率趋势以及急性心肌梗塞或心力衰竭患者的死亡率。在 12 项研究中,只有 3 项研究显示 P4P 计划与效率之间存在正相关关系。来自美国的七项研究没有发现 P4P 对效率影响的证据或结果不一。VBP 对医疗质量、患者体验和成本的影响通常较小,且不显著。在制定政策和决策时,应解决基于价值的支付激励机制对医院的意外负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
"The feedback dilemma"-provider and learner perspectives regarding the barriers and facilitators for giving and receiving feedback in medical education: A parallel mixed methods approach. Appraisal the structure of diabetes self-management education and support in diabetes education units of Isfahan, Iran. Assessing the relationship between dyslexia, psychological distress, and academic self-efficacy among Nigerian university undergraduates. Assessment of self-satisfaction, happiness, and quality of life (QoL) among adults: An online survey. Attitude of the health team to the infant home care plan during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1