Experience Using Multi-Technology for Fall Risk Assessments Among Low-Income Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of gerontological nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-21 DOI:10.3928/00989134-20241009-03
Eunice Oladepe Ojo, Ladda Thiamwong, Victoria Loerzel
{"title":"Experience Using Multi-Technology for Fall Risk Assessments Among Low-Income Community-Dwelling Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment.","authors":"Eunice Oladepe Ojo, Ladda Thiamwong, Victoria Loerzel","doi":"10.3928/00989134-20241009-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the experiences of low-income community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in using multi-technology.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted individual interviews with 14 low-income community-dwelling older adults with MCI aged ≥60 years who participated in a technology-based fall risk assessment study. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. Two researchers worked together using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five themes were generated: <i>Satisfaction With Technology</i>, <i>Benefits of Using Technology</i>, <i>Challenges of Using Technology</i>, <i>Facilitators of Using Technology</i>, and <i>Recommendations for Other Older Adults</i>. All participants acknowledged obtaining information about fall risk, physical activities, and balance performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Older adults with MCI were able to follow instructions by completing fall risk assessments. They found technology enjoyable and beneficial considering the tracking capacity and feedback obtained from the technology used. These were vital objective data that encouraged fall prevention efforts. [<i>Journal of Gerontological Nursing, xx</i>(x), xx-xx.].</p>","PeriodicalId":15848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of gerontological nursing","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of gerontological nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20241009-03","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the experiences of low-income community-dwelling older adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in using multi-technology.

Method: We conducted individual interviews with 14 low-income community-dwelling older adults with MCI aged ≥60 years who participated in a technology-based fall risk assessment study. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. Two researchers worked together using thematic analysis.

Results: Five themes were generated: Satisfaction With Technology, Benefits of Using Technology, Challenges of Using Technology, Facilitators of Using Technology, and Recommendations for Other Older Adults. All participants acknowledged obtaining information about fall risk, physical activities, and balance performance.

Conclusion: Older adults with MCI were able to follow instructions by completing fall risk assessments. They found technology enjoyable and beneficial considering the tracking capacity and feedback obtained from the technology used. These were vital objective data that encouraged fall prevention efforts. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, xx(x), xx-xx.].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在低收入社区居住的轻度认知障碍老年人中使用多种技术进行跌倒风险评估的经验。
目的:探讨低收入社区轻度认知障碍(MCI)老年人使用多种技术的经验:我们对 14 名年龄≥ 60 岁、居住在社区的低收入轻度认知障碍(MCI)老年人进行了个人访谈,他们参与了一项基于技术的跌倒风险评估研究。我们对访谈进行了录音、转录和编码。两名研究人员共同使用主题分析法进行分析:结果:产生了五个主题:结果:产生了五个主题:对技术的满意度、使用技术的好处、使用技术的挑战、使用技术的促进因素以及对其他老年人的建议。所有参与者都承认获得了有关跌倒风险、体育活动和平衡表现的信息:结论:患有 MCI 的老年人能够按照指示完成跌倒风险评估。考虑到跟踪能力和从所使用的技术中获得的反馈,他们认为技术是令人愉快和有益的。这些都是重要的客观数据,有助于预防跌倒。[老年护理学杂志,xx(x),xx-xx]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
7.70%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gerontological Nursing is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing clinically relevant original articles on the practice of gerontological nursing across the continuum of care in a variety of health care settings, for more than 40 years.
期刊最新文献
Adding a Mobility Champion to an Existing Progressive Mobility Protocol: An Evidence-Based Initiative. Describing Community-Based Nurses' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices in the Nutritional Care of Older Adults: Results of a UK Survey. Perceptions of Health Care Provider Interactions Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Hearing Trouble and the Role of an Accompanying Companion. Screening Tools for Alcohol Use Disorder Among Older Adults: A Scoping Review. Workplace Violence and Worker Well-Being: A Preliminary Cross-Sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1