Potential New Methods to Analyze Basal and Total Endogenous Protein Losses of Host and Bacterial Origin in Pigs.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Journal of Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.10.029
Lonneke Noorman, Bart van der Hee, Walter Jj Gerrits, Kim Cm Lammers-Jannink, Arie K Kies, Nikkie van der Wielen, Marco Tretola, Guido Jej Hooiveld, Sonja de Vries
{"title":"Potential New Methods to Analyze Basal and Total Endogenous Protein Losses of Host and Bacterial Origin in Pigs.","authors":"Lonneke Noorman, Bart van der Hee, Walter Jj Gerrits, Kim Cm Lammers-Jannink, Arie K Kies, Nikkie van der Wielen, Marco Tretola, Guido Jej Hooiveld, Sonja de Vries","doi":"10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.10.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current systems for assessing protein quality such as the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score correct apparent amino acid (AA) digestibility for basal endogenous protein losses (bEPL), ignoring the potential influence of the diet on these losses. However, the quantification of total endogenous protein losses (tEPL) poses a challenge.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate different methods for quantifying tEPL and bEPL, and to assess their potential in discriminating between tEPL originating from bacteria and host.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using an incomplete Youden square design, 12 ileal cannulated pigs received 10 different protein sources, and a nitrogen-free (NF) diet. Ileal digesta were collected on days 6 and 7 of each 1-wk feeding period, to quantify endogenous protein losses (EPL) and analyze apparent ileal digestibility. Ileal EPL were estimated based on 1) 16S-+18S gene copy quantitative polymerase chain reaction, 2) diaminopimelic acid (DAPA)+18S, 3) differential AA profiles in digesta, EPL, and bacteria, equaling tEPL, and 4) an NF diet and 5) whey protein isolate (WPI), equaling bEPL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ileal bEPL based on the NF and WPI method correlated moderately to highly (r = 0.69, P < 0.05), but the NF method probably underestimated bEPL. In pigs fed the WPI diet, EPL based on the WPI and AA profile method were highly correlated (r = 0.88, P < 0.01). Overall, tEPL based on the AA profile method were moderately correlated with the 16S+18S method (r = 0.58, P < 0.001), and DAPA+18S (r = 0.57, P < 0.001). Low correlations were observed between bacterial tEPL based on the AA profile method and 16S or DAPA. Host tEPL based on the AA profile method and 18S were weakly correlated (r = 0.39, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The AA profile method seems the most appropriate method for tEPL quantification, whereas the WPI method is preferred for bEPL quantification. Despite challenges in distinguishing between bacterial and host EPL, it is evident that bacterial proteins substantially (on average 37%-83%, depending on method) contribute to the EPL.</p>","PeriodicalId":16620,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nutrition","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjnut.2024.10.029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current systems for assessing protein quality such as the Digestible Indispensable Amino Acid Score correct apparent amino acid (AA) digestibility for basal endogenous protein losses (bEPL), ignoring the potential influence of the diet on these losses. However, the quantification of total endogenous protein losses (tEPL) poses a challenge.

Objectives: To evaluate different methods for quantifying tEPL and bEPL, and to assess their potential in discriminating between tEPL originating from bacteria and host.

Methods: Using an incomplete Youden square design, 12 ileal cannulated pigs received 10 different protein sources, and a nitrogen-free (NF) diet. Ileal digesta were collected on days 6 and 7 of each 1-wk feeding period, to quantify endogenous protein losses (EPL) and analyze apparent ileal digestibility. Ileal EPL were estimated based on 1) 16S-+18S gene copy quantitative polymerase chain reaction, 2) diaminopimelic acid (DAPA)+18S, 3) differential AA profiles in digesta, EPL, and bacteria, equaling tEPL, and 4) an NF diet and 5) whey protein isolate (WPI), equaling bEPL.

Results: Ileal bEPL based on the NF and WPI method correlated moderately to highly (r = 0.69, P < 0.05), but the NF method probably underestimated bEPL. In pigs fed the WPI diet, EPL based on the WPI and AA profile method were highly correlated (r = 0.88, P < 0.01). Overall, tEPL based on the AA profile method were moderately correlated with the 16S+18S method (r = 0.58, P < 0.001), and DAPA+18S (r = 0.57, P < 0.001). Low correlations were observed between bacterial tEPL based on the AA profile method and 16S or DAPA. Host tEPL based on the AA profile method and 18S were weakly correlated (r = 0.39, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: The AA profile method seems the most appropriate method for tEPL quantification, whereas the WPI method is preferred for bEPL quantification. Despite challenges in distinguishing between bacterial and host EPL, it is evident that bacterial proteins substantially (on average 37%-83%, depending on method) contribute to the EPL.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析猪宿主和细菌引起的基础和总内源性蛋白质损失的潜在新方法。分析猪内源性蛋白质的方法。
背景:目前评估蛋白质质量的系统(如可消化不可缺少氨基酸评分(DIAAS))根据基础内源蛋白质损失(bEPL)来校正表观氨基酸消化率,而忽略了日粮对这些损失的潜在影响。然而,内源蛋白质总损失量(tEPL)的量化是一项挑战:目的:评估量化 tEPL 和 bEPL 的不同方法,并评估这些方法在区分来自细菌和宿主的 tEPL 方面的潜力:方法:采用不完全尤登方阵设计,让 12 头回肠插管猪摄入 10 种不同的蛋白质来源和无氮(NF)饮食。在每个为期一周的饲喂期的第 6 天和第 7 天收集回肠消化物,以量化内源性蛋白质损失(EPL)并分析表观回肠消化率。回肠蛋白损失是根据以下因素估算的:1)16S-+18S基因拷贝qPCR;2)二氨基亚氨嘧啶酸(DAPA)+18S;3)消化液、回肠蛋白损失和细菌中的AA差异图谱,等于tEPL;4)NF日粮和5)分离乳清蛋白(WPI),等于bEPL:结果:基于 NF 和 WPI 方法的回肠 bEPL 具有中度-高度相关性(r=0.69,PC 结论:AA曲线法似乎是最适合tEPL定量的方法,而WPI法则是bEPL定量的首选。尽管在区分细菌和宿主 EPL 方面存在挑战,但显而易见的是,细菌蛋白对 EPL 的贡献很大(平均为 37-83%,取决于不同的方法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Nutrition
Journal of Nutrition 医学-营养学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
260
审稿时长
39 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nutrition (JN/J Nutr) publishes peer-reviewed original research papers covering all aspects of experimental nutrition in humans and other animal species; special articles such as reviews and biographies of prominent nutrition scientists; and issues, opinions, and commentaries on controversial issues in nutrition. Supplements are frequently published to provide extended discussion of topics of special interest.
期刊最新文献
Regular use of fish oil supplements, Life's Essential 8 score, and cardiovascular mortality in people with type 2 diabetes: a longitudinal cohort study. Metabolic mechanisms underlying the association between the pro-fertility diet and in vitro fertilization endpoints. Roles of Probiotics, Prebiotics, and Postbiotics in B-cell mediated Immune Regulation. Lutein Emulsion Stabilized by a Food-Grade Biopolymer Enhanced Lutein Bioavailability and Improved Retinal Vessel Morphology in Neonatal Rats with Retinopathy of Prematurity. Predictors of stunting and pathway analysis for linear growth among children 2-3 years of age after a trial of small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplements and home-installed growth charts in three districts in Zambia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1