Accuracy, fit, and marginal quality of advanced additively manufactured and milled zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses.

Abstract

Statement of problem: Advanced additive manufacturing (AM) of zirconia is an emerging technology that can explore the limitations of traditional computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) milling techniques. However, a comprehensive evaluation of their differences in producing zirconia restorations, especially multi-unit restorations, is lacking.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy, fit, marginal quality, and surface roughness of zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) by using advanced AM and 2 CAD-CAM milling materials.

Material and methods: Based on the same CAD model, 30 3-unit posterior FDPs (n=10) were manufactured by using AM and 2 CAD-CAM milling materials (VT and UP). The accuracies of the total, intaglio, occlusal, axial, and marginal regions were calculated separately by comparing the scanned model with the design model by using 3-dimensional (3D) deviation analysis. The silicone layer was scanned to evaluate the marginal and intaglio fit in 3 dimensions. A 3D laser microscope was used for surface roughness detection, marginal quality assessment, and marginal defect measurement. The data were analyzed using ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (α=.05).

Results: Compared with CAD-CAM milling, the AM group had higher accuracy and smaller positive deviations on the axial and intaglio regions (P<.001). Different manufacturing methods showed no statistically significant effect on the mean intaglio fit (P>.05), and all were within the clinically acceptable range (<100 µm). The intaglio gap was significantly higher than the target parameter in the occlusal regions. AM-fabricated FDPs had significantly higher surface roughness than milled ones, yet showed better margin quality with fewer marginal defects CONCLUSIONS: Compared with CAD-CAM milling, the advanced additively manufactured zirconia 3-unit FDPs provided better accuracy, improved margin quality, and clinically acceptable fit, but higher surface roughness, and may be a promising alternative for clinical applications.