Ethan Molitch-Hou, Thomas J Best, Ellis Green, Khanh T Nguyen, Grace LaShore, Matthew T Cerasale
{"title":"Handoffs and Equity: Impact of a Patient Distribution Model on Handoffs for Black Patients.","authors":"Ethan Molitch-Hou, Thomas J Best, Ellis Green, Khanh T Nguyen, Grace LaShore, Matthew T Cerasale","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02196-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospital medicine patient distribution models (PDM) assign patients to inpatient services on hospital admission. Models balance tradeoffs including patient handoffs, physician wellness, subspecialty care, and other factors to ensure optimal outcomes; however, equity is rarely considered. Handoffs during inpatient care can result in medical error and worse patient outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of a PDM that prioritizes use of specialty care services and an overflow service (OS) during high census on racial inequities in handoff frequency.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center retrospective cohort study of inpatient encounters on hospital medicine services from July 2017 to December 2019 was conducted. The primary exposures included being discharged by a general medicine service (GMS) or cared for by an OS. The primary outcome was handoffs per day of stay, analyzed by multivariable regression adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance, discharge from GMS, and care from OS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4165 inpatient hospitalizations with the majority of their stay on a hospital medicine service were reviewed. Patients discharged by GMS (78.2% vs. 58.1%, p < .001) and cared for by OS (78.7% vs. 67.0%, p < .001) were more likely to identify as Black. Multivariable analysis showed a handoff risk ratio of 1.53 (p < .001) for OS patients and 1.06 (p = .01) if discharged from GMS, but race alone did not significantly affect risk of handoffs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The PDM prioritization drove increased handoffs disproportionately for Black patients. Multivariable analysis showed that race alone did not contribute to increased handoffs suggesting the creation of a systemic bias in patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02196-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hospital medicine patient distribution models (PDM) assign patients to inpatient services on hospital admission. Models balance tradeoffs including patient handoffs, physician wellness, subspecialty care, and other factors to ensure optimal outcomes; however, equity is rarely considered. Handoffs during inpatient care can result in medical error and worse patient outcomes. This study evaluates the impact of a PDM that prioritizes use of specialty care services and an overflow service (OS) during high census on racial inequities in handoff frequency.
Methods: A single-center retrospective cohort study of inpatient encounters on hospital medicine services from July 2017 to December 2019 was conducted. The primary exposures included being discharged by a general medicine service (GMS) or cared for by an OS. The primary outcome was handoffs per day of stay, analyzed by multivariable regression adjusted for age, gender, race, ethnicity, insurance, discharge from GMS, and care from OS.
Results: A total of 4165 inpatient hospitalizations with the majority of their stay on a hospital medicine service were reviewed. Patients discharged by GMS (78.2% vs. 58.1%, p < .001) and cared for by OS (78.7% vs. 67.0%, p < .001) were more likely to identify as Black. Multivariable analysis showed a handoff risk ratio of 1.53 (p < .001) for OS patients and 1.06 (p = .01) if discharged from GMS, but race alone did not significantly affect risk of handoffs.
Conclusion: The PDM prioritization drove increased handoffs disproportionately for Black patients. Multivariable analysis showed that race alone did not contribute to increased handoffs suggesting the creation of a systemic bias in patient care.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
