Defining and Categorizing Nonpharmacologic Interventions in the Older Population: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of the American Medical Directors Association Pub Date : 2024-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105306
Eline C M Kooijmans, Emiel O Hoogendijk, Natalia Drapała, Olena Antonenko, George L Burchell, Ilona Barańska, Jitka Pokladníková, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Daniela Fialová, Hein P J van Hout, Karlijn J Joling
{"title":"Defining and Categorizing Nonpharmacologic Interventions in the Older Population: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Eline C M Kooijmans, Emiel O Hoogendijk, Natalia Drapała, Olena Antonenko, George L Burchell, Ilona Barańska, Jitka Pokladníková, Katarzyna Szczerbińska, Daniela Fialová, Hein P J van Hout, Karlijn J Joling","doi":"10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Nonpharmacologic interventions (NPIs) constitute an important part of treatment for older adults, cover a broad and diverse range of interventions, and have advantages over pharmacologic interventions (eg, limited adverse side effects). However, an unambiguous definition of NPIs is still lacking. Defining NPIs may facilitate research on this topic and enhance comparability of results between studies, and might help to face the challenges of recognition, acceptation, funding, and implementation. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide an overview and comparison of the definitions of NPIs used in the current literature on older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review was performed to provide an overview of the definitions of NPIs that are used in the current literature on older populations and to organize the characteristics involved in the definitions.</p><p><strong>Setting and participants: </strong>People ≥60 years of age were included, not limited to a specific setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was performed in the following 5 databases: PubMed, Embase, Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Wiley/Cochrane Library. The time frame within the databases was from inception to December 4, 2023. Review articles, editorials and consensus papers were included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 28 articles. We organized the definitions of NPI according to 4 different aspects: types of interventions involved, target population, goals the interventions addressed, and requirements of the interventions. Definitions in the current literature can generally be divided into 2 groups: NPIs described as not involving medication, and more elaborated multidomain definitions. Based on the results, we formulated criteria for types of interventions that can be considered an NPI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and implications: </strong>Using current descriptions and characteristics, elements for a new definition for NPIs were proposed. To improve research in this field, consensus needs to be reached regarding elements covered by a definition of NPIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17180,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Directors Association","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105306","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Nonpharmacologic interventions (NPIs) constitute an important part of treatment for older adults, cover a broad and diverse range of interventions, and have advantages over pharmacologic interventions (eg, limited adverse side effects). However, an unambiguous definition of NPIs is still lacking. Defining NPIs may facilitate research on this topic and enhance comparability of results between studies, and might help to face the challenges of recognition, acceptation, funding, and implementation. Therefore, the aim of this review was to provide an overview and comparison of the definitions of NPIs used in the current literature on older adults.

Design: A systematic review was performed to provide an overview of the definitions of NPIs that are used in the current literature on older populations and to organize the characteristics involved in the definitions.

Setting and participants: People ≥60 years of age were included, not limited to a specific setting.

Methods: A systematic search was performed in the following 5 databases: PubMed, Embase, Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Wiley/Cochrane Library. The time frame within the databases was from inception to December 4, 2023. Review articles, editorials and consensus papers were included.

Results: We included 28 articles. We organized the definitions of NPI according to 4 different aspects: types of interventions involved, target population, goals the interventions addressed, and requirements of the interventions. Definitions in the current literature can generally be divided into 2 groups: NPIs described as not involving medication, and more elaborated multidomain definitions. Based on the results, we formulated criteria for types of interventions that can be considered an NPI.

Conclusions and implications: Using current descriptions and characteristics, elements for a new definition for NPIs were proposed. To improve research in this field, consensus needs to be reached regarding elements covered by a definition of NPIs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
界定和分类老年人口中的非药物干预措施:系统回顾。
目的:非药物干预(NPIs)是老年人治疗的重要组成部分,涵盖广泛且多样的干预措施,与药物干预相比具有优势(例如,不良副作用有限)。然而,目前仍缺乏对 NPI 的明确定义。定义 NPIs 可促进对该主题的研究,提高研究结果之间的可比性,并有助于应对认可、接受、资助和实施方面的挑战。因此,本综述旨在概述和比较目前有关老年人的文献中使用的 NPI 定义:进行系统性综述,概述目前有关老年人口的文献中使用的 NPI 定义,并整理定义中涉及的特征:包括年龄≥60 岁的人群,不限于特定环境:方法:在以下 5 个数据库中进行了系统检索:方法:在以下 5 个数据库中进行了系统检索:PubMed、Embase、Clarivate Analytics/Web of Science Core Collection、Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature 和 Wiley/Cochrane Library。数据库的时间范围从开始到 2023 年 12 月 4 日。结果:我们收录了 28 篇文章。我们根据以下 4 个不同方面对 NPI 的定义进行了整理:涉及的干预类型、目标人群、干预所针对的目标以及干预的要求。目前文献中的定义一般可分为两类:描述为不涉及药物治疗的 NPI,以及更为详尽的多领域定义。根据研究结果,我们制定了可被视为 NPI 的干预类型的标准:利用当前的描述和特征,提出了 NPI 新定义的要素。为了改进这一领域的研究,需要就非营利组织定义所涵盖的要素达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
6.60%
发文量
472
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: JAMDA, the official journal of AMDA - The Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine, is a leading peer-reviewed publication that offers practical information and research geared towards healthcare professionals in the post-acute and long-term care fields. It is also a valuable resource for policy-makers, organizational leaders, educators, and advocates. The journal provides essential information for various healthcare professionals such as medical directors, attending physicians, nurses, consultant pharmacists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurse practitioners, physician assistants, physical and occupational therapists, social workers, and others involved in providing, overseeing, and promoting quality
期刊最新文献
Higher Magnesium Intake Is Associated With a Lower Risk of Frailty in Older Adults. Emerging Digital Technologies Used for Fall Detection in Older Adults in Aged Care: A Scoping Review. Association Between Time Since Smoking Cessation and Frailty Trajectory Among Community-Dwelling Older People: English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. ORIENT Diet: A Potential Neuroprotective Dietary Pattern for Chinese Stroke High-Risk Population. Designing LTC Physical Work Environments to Support Worker Well-being: A Review and Recommendations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1