[Online quizzes for practice and assessment of pharmacotherapeutic knowledge during clinical courses in medical school - a pilot study in the psychiatry and neurology courses].

Lakartidningen Pub Date : 2024-10-04
Susanna M Wallerstedt, Katarina Jood, Silke Kern, Catrin Rönnbäck, Steinn Steingrimsson, Elisabet Wentz, Johan Zelano, Filip Bergquist
{"title":"[Online quizzes for practice and assessment of pharmacotherapeutic knowledge during clinical courses in medical school - a pilot study in the psychiatry and neurology courses].","authors":"Susanna M Wallerstedt, Katarina Jood, Silke Kern, Catrin Rönnbäck, Steinn Steingrimsson, Elisabet Wentz, Johan Zelano, Filip Bergquist","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we developed auto-graded quizzes for practice and for summative assessment, covering drugs of relevance in the undergraduate clinical psychiatry and neurology courses in medical school. The underlying intention was to combine repetition of theoretical aspects and promoting progression to the clinical context. The quizzes were implemented in two steps. After the courses in question were completed, before and after the first as well as the second step of quiz implementation, the students' achieved level of knowledge was investigated by a voluntary formative test/questionnaire including 20 patient-based single best answer questions. In the first step, voluntary practice quizzes and a summative assessment test were introduced. In the second step, a clinical context was provided to the quizzes, using the structure of the practical manual to good prescribing issued by the World Health Organization in 1994. Furthermore, the summative test was expanded for improved constructive alignment, exposing the students to the drug-related course content to a greater extent. In all, 274 students out of 404 participated in the study (response rate: 68%; 56% women; 66% ≤24 years). Compared with before the quiz implementation (median number of correct answers: 10 [interquartile range: 9-13]), no difference was seen after the first step (11 [8-13]; P=0.88) but a clear improvement appeared after the second step (14 [12-16]; P<0.0001). After the second step, the students reported having used all (17%), most (22%), some (32%), or no (29%) practice quizzes. The extent of use was positively correlated with the number of correct answers in the formative test (r=0.33; P=0.002). After the second step, the student-reported number of attempts at the assessment quiz was in median 6 times (interquartile range: 3-9). There was a negative correlation between the number of quiz attempts and the extent of use of practice quizzes (r=-0.22; P=0.034) as well as the number of correct answers in the formative test (r=-0.44; P<0.0001). In conclusion, practice and assessment quizzes about drugs, elaborated with clinical context and constructive alignment, may increase pharmacotherapeutic knowledge in medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":17988,"journal":{"name":"Lakartidningen","volume":"121 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lakartidningen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we developed auto-graded quizzes for practice and for summative assessment, covering drugs of relevance in the undergraduate clinical psychiatry and neurology courses in medical school. The underlying intention was to combine repetition of theoretical aspects and promoting progression to the clinical context. The quizzes were implemented in two steps. After the courses in question were completed, before and after the first as well as the second step of quiz implementation, the students' achieved level of knowledge was investigated by a voluntary formative test/questionnaire including 20 patient-based single best answer questions. In the first step, voluntary practice quizzes and a summative assessment test were introduced. In the second step, a clinical context was provided to the quizzes, using the structure of the practical manual to good prescribing issued by the World Health Organization in 1994. Furthermore, the summative test was expanded for improved constructive alignment, exposing the students to the drug-related course content to a greater extent. In all, 274 students out of 404 participated in the study (response rate: 68%; 56% women; 66% ≤24 years). Compared with before the quiz implementation (median number of correct answers: 10 [interquartile range: 9-13]), no difference was seen after the first step (11 [8-13]; P=0.88) but a clear improvement appeared after the second step (14 [12-16]; P<0.0001). After the second step, the students reported having used all (17%), most (22%), some (32%), or no (29%) practice quizzes. The extent of use was positively correlated with the number of correct answers in the formative test (r=0.33; P=0.002). After the second step, the student-reported number of attempts at the assessment quiz was in median 6 times (interquartile range: 3-9). There was a negative correlation between the number of quiz attempts and the extent of use of practice quizzes (r=-0.22; P=0.034) as well as the number of correct answers in the formative test (r=-0.44; P<0.0001). In conclusion, practice and assessment quizzes about drugs, elaborated with clinical context and constructive alignment, may increase pharmacotherapeutic knowledge in medical students.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[医学院临床课程中药物治疗知识的练习和评估在线测验--精神病学和神经病学课程的试点研究]。
在这项研究中,我们开发了用于练习和总结性评估的自动评分测验,涵盖医学院临床精神病学和神经病学本科课程中的相关药物。其根本目的是将理论方面的重复与促进临床方面的进展结合起来。测验分两步进行。课程结束后,在第一步和第二步测验实施前后,通过自愿形成性测试/问卷调查学生达到的知识水平,其中包括 20 个基于病人的最佳答案问题。在第一步中,引入了自愿练习测验和终结性评估测试。第二步,采用世界卫生组织 1994 年发布的《良好处方实用手册》的结构,为测验提供临床背景。此外,还扩充了终结性测验的内容,以提高建设性的一致性,让学生在更大程度上接触到与药物相关的课程内容。在 404 名学生中,共有 274 名学生参与了研究(回复率:68%;56% 为女性;66% 年龄小于 24 岁)。与实施测验前相比(正确答案的中位数:10 [四分位数范围:9-13]),第一步测验后没有出现差异(11 [8-13]; P=0.88),但第二步测验后出现了明显改善(14 [12-16]; P=0.88)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lakartidningen
Lakartidningen Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
期刊最新文献
[Access to surgery]. [Unequal access to safe cesarean section - threat to global maternal health care]. [Wise priorities and Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC) can save many lives]. [Task sharing - a solution for rich and poor?] [The role of anaesthesia in global health].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1