[Summary »The unsuccessful doctors« or »the real doctors«? - what students hear about GPs].

Lakartidningen Pub Date : 2024-10-14
Malin K Hedman, Mante Hedman, Anette Edin-Liljegren
{"title":"[Summary »The unsuccessful doctors« or »the real doctors«? - what students hear about GPs].","authors":"Malin K Hedman, Mante Hedman, Anette Edin-Liljegren","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A school's culture has been shown to influence medical students in their choice of future discipline. Therefore, we aimed to explore the culture towards the general practice discipline, as reflected in comments to medical students from their teachers and clinical tutors. Students in their 6th and 11th terms at the Universities of Umeå and Uppsala participated in a questionnaire study. A qualitative analysis of free-text answers of comments was conducted with thematic analysis. The students reported receiving both appreciative and deprecatory comments about general practice and GPs, which altogether ended up in two head themes: work-related factors and opinions about GPs. Appreciative comments included »important«, »varying«, »responsible work«, »broad skills«, and »good working hours«. Deprecatory comments included »stressful jobs«, »unstimulating routine work«, »incompetent doctors«, and »low status«. Considering the present shortfall of GPs, such deprecatory comments are worrying and could hamper the future recruitment of GPs.</p>","PeriodicalId":17988,"journal":{"name":"Lakartidningen","volume":"121 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lakartidningen","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A school's culture has been shown to influence medical students in their choice of future discipline. Therefore, we aimed to explore the culture towards the general practice discipline, as reflected in comments to medical students from their teachers and clinical tutors. Students in their 6th and 11th terms at the Universities of Umeå and Uppsala participated in a questionnaire study. A qualitative analysis of free-text answers of comments was conducted with thematic analysis. The students reported receiving both appreciative and deprecatory comments about general practice and GPs, which altogether ended up in two head themes: work-related factors and opinions about GPs. Appreciative comments included »important«, »varying«, »responsible work«, »broad skills«, and »good working hours«. Deprecatory comments included »stressful jobs«, »unstimulating routine work«, »incompetent doctors«, and »low status«. Considering the present shortfall of GPs, such deprecatory comments are worrying and could hamper the future recruitment of GPs.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[摘要 "不成功的医生 "还是 "真正的医生"?- 学生对全科医生的看法]。
事实证明,学校文化会影响医学生对未来学科的选择。因此,我们旨在探索全科医学学科的文化,这体现在医学生的老师和临床导师对他们的评价中。于默奥大学和乌普萨拉大学第 6 届和第 11 届的学生参加了问卷调查。研究采用主题分析法对评论的自由文本答案进行了定性分析。学生们对全科医生和全科医生的评价既有赞赏的,也有贬低的,最终形成了两个主题:与工作相关的因素和对全科医生的看法。赞赏性评论包括 "重要"、"不同"、"负责任的工作"、"广泛的技能 "和 "良好的工作时间"。贬义词包括 "工作压力大"、"日常工作不刺激"、"医生不称职 "和 "地位低"。考虑到目前全科医生短缺的情况,这些贬低性评论令人担忧,并可能阻碍未来全科医生的招聘。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Lakartidningen
Lakartidningen Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
134
期刊最新文献
[Access to surgery]. [Unequal access to safe cesarean section - threat to global maternal health care]. [Wise priorities and Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC) can save many lives]. [Task sharing - a solution for rich and poor?] [The role of anaesthesia in global health].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1