Four-year follow-up of weight loss maintenance using electronic medical record data: The PROPEL trial.

IF 1.9 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Obesity Science & Practice Pub Date : 2024-10-19 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1002/osp4.70017
Peter T Katzmarzyk, Emily F Mire, Ronald Horswell, San T Chu, Dachuan Zhang, Corby K Martin, Robert L Newton, John W Apolzan, Eboni G Price-Haywood, Dan Fort, Thomas W Carton, Kara D Denstel
{"title":"Four-year follow-up of weight loss maintenance using electronic medical record data: The PROPEL trial.","authors":"Peter T Katzmarzyk, Emily F Mire, Ronald Horswell, San T Chu, Dachuan Zhang, Corby K Martin, Robert L Newton, John W Apolzan, Eboni G Price-Haywood, Dan Fort, Thomas W Carton, Kara D Denstel","doi":"10.1002/osp4.70017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale: </strong>Short-term weight loss is possible in a variety of settings. However, long-term, free-living weight loss maintenance following structured weight loss interventions remains elusive.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose was to study body weight trajectories over 2 years of intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) and up to 4 years of follow-up versus usual care (UC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from electronic medical records (EMRs) from participating clinics. Baseline (Day 0) was established as the EMR data point closest but prior to the baseline date of the trial. The sample included 111 ILI and 196 UC patients. The primary statistical analysis focused on differentiating weight loss trajectories between ILI and UC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The ILI group experienced significantly greater weight loss compared with the UC group from Day 100 to Day 700, beyond which there were no significant differences. Intensive lifestyle intervention patients who maintained ≥5% and ≥10% weight loss at 24 months demonstrated significantly greater weight loss (<i>p</i> < 0.001) across the active intervention and follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Following 24 months of active intervention, patients with ILI regained weight toward their baseline to the point where ILI versus UC differences were no longer statistically or clinically significant. However, patients in the ILI who experienced ≥5% or ≥10% weight loss at the cessation of the active intervention maintained greater weight loss at the end of the follow-up phase.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02561221.</p>","PeriodicalId":19448,"journal":{"name":"Obesity Science & Practice","volume":"10 5","pages":"e70017"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11490219/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obesity Science & Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/osp4.70017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Short-term weight loss is possible in a variety of settings. However, long-term, free-living weight loss maintenance following structured weight loss interventions remains elusive.

Objective: The purpose was to study body weight trajectories over 2 years of intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) and up to 4 years of follow-up versus usual care (UC).

Methods: Data were obtained from electronic medical records (EMRs) from participating clinics. Baseline (Day 0) was established as the EMR data point closest but prior to the baseline date of the trial. The sample included 111 ILI and 196 UC patients. The primary statistical analysis focused on differentiating weight loss trajectories between ILI and UC.

Results: The ILI group experienced significantly greater weight loss compared with the UC group from Day 100 to Day 700, beyond which there were no significant differences. Intensive lifestyle intervention patients who maintained ≥5% and ≥10% weight loss at 24 months demonstrated significantly greater weight loss (p < 0.001) across the active intervention and follow-up.

Conclusions: Following 24 months of active intervention, patients with ILI regained weight toward their baseline to the point where ILI versus UC differences were no longer statistically or clinically significant. However, patients in the ILI who experienced ≥5% or ≥10% weight loss at the cessation of the active intervention maintained greater weight loss at the end of the follow-up phase.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02561221.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用电子病历数据对减肥维持情况进行四年跟踪:PROPEL 试验。
理由:在各种情况下,短期减肥是可能的。然而,在进行结构化减肥干预后,长期、自由生活的减肥效果仍难以维持:目的:研究强化生活方式干预(ILI)2 年后的体重轨迹,以及与常规护理(UC)相比长达 4 年的随访情况:数据来自参与研究的诊所的电子病历(EMR)。基线(第 0 天)被确定为最接近但早于试验基线日期的 EMR 数据点。样本包括 111 名 ILI 患者和 196 名 UC 患者。主要统计分析的重点是区分 ILI 和 UC 的体重减轻轨迹:结果:从第 100 天到第 700 天,ILI 组的体重减轻幅度明显大于 UC 组,但两者之间没有显著差异。强化生活方式干预患者的体重在 24 个月内保持≥5% 和≥10% 的下降幅度明显更大(p 结论:强化生活方式干预患者的体重在 24 个月内保持≥5% 和≥10% 的下降幅度明显更大:经过 24 个月的积极干预后,ILI 患者的体重恢复到基线水平,ILI 与 UC 的差异在统计学或临床上不再显著。然而,在积极干预停止时体重下降≥5%或≥10%的ILI患者在随访阶段结束时体重下降幅度更大:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT02561221。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obesity Science & Practice
Obesity Science & Practice ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
73
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊最新文献
Behavioral weight loss interventions in college health centers: A qualitative analysis of barriers and facilitators to implementation. A Novel and Comprehensive Wellness Assessment for Lifestyle-Based Interventions. Results of a pilot sequential multiple assignment randomized trial using counseling to augment a digital weight loss program. Predictors of ongoing attendance at an Australian publicly funded specialist obesity service. The impact of weight self-stigma on weight-loss treatment engagement and outcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1