Michael LaPelusa, Shadi Chamseddine, Hop Sanderson Tran Cao, Lianchun Xiao, Elshad Hasanov, Priya Bhosale, Hesham M Amin, Yehia I Mohamed, Betul Gok Yavuz, Yara Sakr, Li Xu, Ian Hu, Sunyoung S Lee, Divya Sakamuri, Sonali Jindal, Van Nguyen, Michael A Curran, Ryan Sun, Asif Rashid, Dan Gabriel Duda, Padmanee Sharma, Aliya Qayyum, Ahmed Omar Kaseb
{"title":"Tissue and Imaging Biomarkers of Response to Neoadjuvant Nivolumab or Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Patients with Resectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma.","authors":"Michael LaPelusa, Shadi Chamseddine, Hop Sanderson Tran Cao, Lianchun Xiao, Elshad Hasanov, Priya Bhosale, Hesham M Amin, Yehia I Mohamed, Betul Gok Yavuz, Yara Sakr, Li Xu, Ian Hu, Sunyoung S Lee, Divya Sakamuri, Sonali Jindal, Van Nguyen, Michael A Curran, Ryan Sun, Asif Rashid, Dan Gabriel Duda, Padmanee Sharma, Aliya Qayyum, Ahmed Omar Kaseb","doi":"10.1159/000541250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Perioperative immunotherapy has shown promise in some patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study examined tissue and imaging biomarkers associated with pathologic response in a phase II clinical trial in patients with resectable HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Analysis included 18 patients with biopsy-proven resectable HCC treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in a phase II clinical trial at MD Anderson Cancer Center (NCT03222076). Liver MRE (to measure tissue fibrosis) and biopsies (to evaluate immune activation markers) were obtained serially pretreatment and after completing neoadjuvant immunotherapy. A major pathologic response (MPR) was defined as tumor necrosis of more than 70%. Data comparing patients with MPR versus those without were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with MPR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy tended to have larger tumors (mean 9.52 vs. 4.99 centimeters; p = 0.050). They had a significant reduction in tumor size posttreatment (14.67% reduction vs. 9.15% increase in size; p = 0.042) and a nonsignificant decrease in serum AFP (-24.20% vs. -14.00%; p = 0.085). Further, patients with MPR had a greater increase in intratumoral expression levels of CD8 (26.92% vs. -0.04%; p = 0.026), granzyme B (15.56% vs. -2.24%; p = 0.011), and PD-1 (20.17% vs. 0.40%; p = 0.048) but not PD-L1 (7.69% vs. 0.57%; p = 0.26). For imaging biomarkers, tumor and liver fibrosis were comparable before and after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with MPR versus nonresponders.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Changes in tumor size, immune cell infiltration, and immune cell activation are candidate predictive markers of pathologic response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable HCC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19497,"journal":{"name":"Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Perioperative immunotherapy has shown promise in some patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study examined tissue and imaging biomarkers associated with pathologic response in a phase II clinical trial in patients with resectable HCC.
Methods: Analysis included 18 patients with biopsy-proven resectable HCC treated with neoadjuvant nivolumab plus ipilimumab or nivolumab alone in a phase II clinical trial at MD Anderson Cancer Center (NCT03222076). Liver MRE (to measure tissue fibrosis) and biopsies (to evaluate immune activation markers) were obtained serially pretreatment and after completing neoadjuvant immunotherapy. A major pathologic response (MPR) was defined as tumor necrosis of more than 70%. Data comparing patients with MPR versus those without were summarized using descriptive statistics and compared using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test.
Results: Patients with MPR after neoadjuvant immunotherapy tended to have larger tumors (mean 9.52 vs. 4.99 centimeters; p = 0.050). They had a significant reduction in tumor size posttreatment (14.67% reduction vs. 9.15% increase in size; p = 0.042) and a nonsignificant decrease in serum AFP (-24.20% vs. -14.00%; p = 0.085). Further, patients with MPR had a greater increase in intratumoral expression levels of CD8 (26.92% vs. -0.04%; p = 0.026), granzyme B (15.56% vs. -2.24%; p = 0.011), and PD-1 (20.17% vs. 0.40%; p = 0.048) but not PD-L1 (7.69% vs. 0.57%; p = 0.26). For imaging biomarkers, tumor and liver fibrosis were comparable before and after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with MPR versus nonresponders.
Conclusion: Changes in tumor size, immune cell infiltration, and immune cell activation are candidate predictive markers of pathologic response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable HCC.
期刊介绍:
Although laboratory and clinical cancer research need to be closely linked, observations at the basic level often remain removed from medical applications. This journal works to accelerate the translation of experimental results into the clinic, and back again into the laboratory for further investigation. The fundamental purpose of this effort is to advance clinically-relevant knowledge of cancer, and improve the outcome of prevention, diagnosis and treatment of malignant disease. The journal publishes significant clinical studies from cancer programs around the world, along with important translational laboratory findings, mini-reviews (invited and submitted) and in-depth discussions of evolving and controversial topics in the oncology arena. A unique feature of the journal is a new section which focuses on rapid peer-review and subsequent publication of short reports of phase 1 and phase 2 clinical cancer trials, with a goal of insuring that high-quality clinical cancer research quickly enters the public domain, regardless of the trial’s ultimate conclusions regarding efficacy or toxicity.