Disclosure of mandatory and voluntary nutrition labelling information across major online food retailers in the USA.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Public Health Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-10-17 DOI:10.1017/S1368980024001289
Julia Reedy Sharib, Jennifer L Pomeranz, Dariush Mozaffarian, Sean B Cash
{"title":"Disclosure of mandatory and voluntary nutrition labelling information across major online food retailers in the USA.","authors":"Julia Reedy Sharib, Jennifer L Pomeranz, Dariush Mozaffarian, Sean B Cash","doi":"10.1017/S1368980024001289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Nutrition labelling is mandatory on food products in retail stores, but compliance in the rapidly expanding online setting remains unclear. We assessed mandatory and voluntary labelling information across major U.S. online retailers.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Between January and August 2022, we evaluated a representative basket of sixty food and beverage items across eight product categories of ten major retailers. We evaluated online presence, accessibility and legibility of four mandatory elements - Nutrition Facts, ingredients, allergen statements and percent juice for fruit drinks - and presence of seven voluntary elements - nutrient content claims, health/qualified health claims, ingredient claims, structure-function claims, additive claims, front-of-package nutrient profiling symbols and other marketing claims.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Major online food retailers in the USA.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>N/A.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On average, each mandatory element was present, accessible and legible for only 35·1 % of items, varying modestly by element (from 38·3 % for ingredients lists to 31·5 % for Nutrition Facts) but widely by retailer (6·6-86·3 %). Voluntary elements were present for 45·8 % of items, ranging from 83·7 % for marketing claims to 2·0 % for structure-function claims. Findings were generally consistent across the eight product categories. Voluntary elements were more frequently present than accessible and legible mandatory elements for six of ten retailers and seven of eight product categories.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Mandatory nutrition label elements are not commonly present, accessible and legible in online retail settings and are less consistently present than marketing elements. Coordinated industry and regulatory actions may be needed to ensure consumers can access mandatory nutrition information to make healthy and safe food choices online.</p>","PeriodicalId":20951,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980024001289","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Nutrition labelling is mandatory on food products in retail stores, but compliance in the rapidly expanding online setting remains unclear. We assessed mandatory and voluntary labelling information across major U.S. online retailers.

Design: Between January and August 2022, we evaluated a representative basket of sixty food and beverage items across eight product categories of ten major retailers. We evaluated online presence, accessibility and legibility of four mandatory elements - Nutrition Facts, ingredients, allergen statements and percent juice for fruit drinks - and presence of seven voluntary elements - nutrient content claims, health/qualified health claims, ingredient claims, structure-function claims, additive claims, front-of-package nutrient profiling symbols and other marketing claims.

Setting: Major online food retailers in the USA.

Participants: N/A.

Results: On average, each mandatory element was present, accessible and legible for only 35·1 % of items, varying modestly by element (from 38·3 % for ingredients lists to 31·5 % for Nutrition Facts) but widely by retailer (6·6-86·3 %). Voluntary elements were present for 45·8 % of items, ranging from 83·7 % for marketing claims to 2·0 % for structure-function claims. Findings were generally consistent across the eight product categories. Voluntary elements were more frequently present than accessible and legible mandatory elements for six of ten retailers and seven of eight product categories.

Conclusions: Mandatory nutrition label elements are not commonly present, accessible and legible in online retail settings and are less consistently present than marketing elements. Coordinated industry and regulatory actions may be needed to ensure consumers can access mandatory nutrition information to make healthy and safe food choices online.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国主要在线食品零售商的强制性和自愿性营养标签信息披露。
目的:零售店的食品必须标注营养标签,但在快速发展的网络环境中,食品营养标签的合规性仍不明确。我们对美国主要在线零售商的强制性和自愿性标签信息进行了评估:设计:2022 年 1 月至 8 月间,我们对 10 家主要零售商的 8 个产品类别中具有代表性的 60 种食品和饮料进行了评估。我们评估了四个强制性要素--营养成分、配料、过敏原声明和果汁饮料的果汁百分比--以及七个自愿性要素--营养成分声明、健康/合格健康声明、配料声明、结构功能声明、添加剂声明、包装前营养成分剖析符号和其他营销声明--的在线存在、可访问性和可读性:调查对象:美国主要的在线食品零售商:结果平均而言,只有 35-1% 的商品存在、可获取和可读的每个强制性元素,不同元素之间的差异不大(从配料表的 38-3% 到营养成分表的 31-5%),但不同零售商之间的差异很大(6-6-86-3%)。45-8%的产品含有自愿成分,其中营销声称占 83-7%,结构功能声称占 2-0%。八个产品类别的调查结果基本一致。在 10 个零售商中的 6 个和 8 个产品类别中的 7 个中,自愿性元素比易懂易读的强制性元素更常见:结论:在网上零售环境中,强制性营养标签元素并不普遍存在,也不容易获取和辨认,而且与营销元素相比,其存在的一致性较低。可能需要协调行业和监管部门的行动,以确保消费者能够获取强制性营养信息,从而在网上做出健康安全的食品选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Public Health Nutrition
Public Health Nutrition 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
521
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Public Health Nutrition provides an international peer-reviewed forum for the publication and dissemination of research and scholarship aimed at understanding the causes of, and approaches and solutions to nutrition-related public health achievements, situations and problems around the world. The journal publishes original and commissioned articles, commentaries and discussion papers for debate. The journal is of interest to epidemiologists and health promotion specialists interested in the role of nutrition in disease prevention; academics and those involved in fieldwork and the application of research to identify practical solutions to important public health problems.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of and factors associated with overweight and obesity in patients with severe mental disorders in Shenzhen: results from the urban Chinese population. Why health systems cannot fix problems caused by food systems: a call to integrate accountability for obesity into food systems policy. Effects of probiotics on selected anthropometrics and biochemical measures in overweight or obese Saudi subjects: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised clinical trial. Prenatal iodine intake and infant temperament in a multiethnic US cohort. Understanding Behavioral Drivers of Iron and Folic Acid Supplementation and Vitamin A- and Iron-Rich Food Consumption among Women and Adolescent Girls in Niger.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1