The Associating Factors of Parent-Teen and Peer Relationships Among Chinese Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S474339
Jiaxin Luo, Qingting Li, Robin Whittemore, Maritta Välimäki, Jia Guo
{"title":"The Associating Factors of Parent-Teen and Peer Relationships Among Chinese Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus.","authors":"Jiaxin Luo, Qingting Li, Robin Whittemore, Maritta Välimäki, Jia Guo","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S474339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Positive parent-teen and peer relationships are crucial support resources for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). There is quite a bit of research on parent-teen relationships in Western countries, less so with peer relationships. Additionally, information on these relationships and their influencing factors among adolescents from other regions with different family culture and peer cohesion is limited, which impedes the development of targeted interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed baseline data from a randomized controlled trial in China involving 122 adolescents with T1DM aged 12-18 years. Data were collected using established questionnaires on social-demographic and clinical characteristics, perceived stress, general self-efficacy, coping styles, diabetes self-management, and parent-teen and peer relationships. Multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the associating factors of parent-teen relationships and peer relationships respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total score of the parent-teen relationships subscale was 11.02 ± 2.77, within a theoretical range of 4-16. The total score of the peer relationships subscale was 16.51 ± 2.42, within a theoretical range of 5-20. Positive coping styles, less negative coping styles, and more collaboration with parents in diabetes self-management were associated with better parent-teen relationships. Younger age, positive coping styles, less negative coping styles, and higher goals for diabetes self-management were associated with better peer relationships.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is room to improve parent-teen relationships, maybe via encouraging more collaboration between parents and adolescents for diabetes management. The coping styles training is indicated to improve both relationships.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"17 ","pages":"3611-3623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11492902/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S474339","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Positive parent-teen and peer relationships are crucial support resources for adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). There is quite a bit of research on parent-teen relationships in Western countries, less so with peer relationships. Additionally, information on these relationships and their influencing factors among adolescents from other regions with different family culture and peer cohesion is limited, which impedes the development of targeted interventions.

Methods: This study analyzed baseline data from a randomized controlled trial in China involving 122 adolescents with T1DM aged 12-18 years. Data were collected using established questionnaires on social-demographic and clinical characteristics, perceived stress, general self-efficacy, coping styles, diabetes self-management, and parent-teen and peer relationships. Multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted to determine the associating factors of parent-teen relationships and peer relationships respectively.

Results: The total score of the parent-teen relationships subscale was 11.02 ± 2.77, within a theoretical range of 4-16. The total score of the peer relationships subscale was 16.51 ± 2.42, within a theoretical range of 5-20. Positive coping styles, less negative coping styles, and more collaboration with parents in diabetes self-management were associated with better parent-teen relationships. Younger age, positive coping styles, less negative coping styles, and higher goals for diabetes self-management were associated with better peer relationships.

Conclusion: There is room to improve parent-teen relationships, maybe via encouraging more collaboration between parents and adolescents for diabetes management. The coping styles training is indicated to improve both relationships.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国 1 型糖尿病青少年亲子关系和同伴关系的相关因素。
背景:积极的亲子关系和同伴关系对于患有 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)的青少年来说是至关重要的支持资源。西方国家对父母与青少年关系的研究颇多,但对同伴关系的研究较少。此外,来自家庭文化和同伴凝聚力不同的其他地区的青少年在这些关系及其影响因素方面的信息也很有限,这阻碍了有针对性的干预措施的发展:本研究分析了中国一项随机对照试验的基线数据,该试验涉及 122 名 12-18 岁患有 T1DM 的青少年。数据收集采用了既定的调查问卷,内容包括社会人口学和临床特征、感知压力、一般自我效能感、应对方式、糖尿病自我管理、父母与青少年及同伴关系。研究人员分别对父母与青少年关系和同伴关系的相关因素进行了多元线性回归分析:父母与青少年关系分量表的总分为(11.02 ± 2.77),理论范围为 4-16。同伴关系分量表的总分为(16.51±2.42)分,理论范围在 5-20 分之间。积极的应对方式、较少的消极应对方式以及与父母在糖尿病自我管理方面更多的合作与更好的父母-青少年关系有关。年龄越小、积极应对方式越多、消极应对方式越少、糖尿病自我管理目标越高,与更好的同伴关系相关:父母与青少年之间的关系还有改善的余地,或许可以通过鼓励父母与青少年在糖尿病管理方面加强合作来实现。应对方式培训可改善这两种关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
期刊最新文献
Gratitude Experience in Ten Patients with Spinal Muscular Atrophy: A Qualitative Study. The Role of Cognitive and Emotional Factors in the Relationship Between Childhood Trauma and Non-Suicidal Self-Injury Among College Students: A Network Analysis. Social Aspects of Problematic Smartphone Use: Development and Validation of the PSSNUS and Mental Health Implications for Spanish Youth. The Association Between Autistic Traits and Depression in College Students: The Mediating Roles of Interpersonal Emotion Regulation and Social Self-Efficacy. Childhood Maltreatment and Adolescent Eating Disorders' Symptoms: A Moderated Mediation Model of Social Anxiety and Physical Activity.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1