Lora M A Thompson, Nele Loecher, Alexandra Albizu-Jacob, Hye Sook Chon, Robert M Wenham, Kristine A Donovan
{"title":"Post-traumatic reactions and quality of life after pelvic exenteration for gynecologic cancer: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Lora M A Thompson, Nele Loecher, Alexandra Albizu-Jacob, Hye Sook Chon, Robert M Wenham, Kristine A Donovan","doi":"10.1007/s00520-024-08899-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We examined post-traumatic reactions and quality of life in women with recurrent gynecologic cancer who underwent a pelvic exenteration (PE), a potentially life-saving radical surgery associated with life-altering sequelae.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-one women who had completed PE at least 6 months prior completed the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, a measure of post-traumatic stress, the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory, a measure of post-traumatic growth, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item core Quality of Life Questionnaire. We examined the associations between these outcome variables, and quality of life scores were compared to normative values for the general and gynecologic cancer populations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty percent of women reported clinically significant post-traumatic stress symptoms and 71% endorsed clinically significant depressive symptoms. More post-traumatic stress was associated with less post-traumatic growth, more depressive symptoms, and worse quality of life. In general, women's quality of life was worse than the general population but comparable to women with stage III-IV ovarian cancer and women with cervical cancer. Social functioning was markedly lower in our sample and women reported more pain, diarrhea, and financial difficulties post-PE compared to published norms for the general population and women with ovarian or cervical cancer. There were no differences in quality of life based on age, type of PE, type of urinary diversion, or cancer type.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings support long-term continued symptom management and the ongoing rehabilitation of patients to optimize physical, psychological, and social well-being in PE survivorship.</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"32 11","pages":"729"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-024-08899-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: We examined post-traumatic reactions and quality of life in women with recurrent gynecologic cancer who underwent a pelvic exenteration (PE), a potentially life-saving radical surgery associated with life-altering sequelae.
Methods: Twenty-one women who had completed PE at least 6 months prior completed the Impact of Event Scale-Revised, a measure of post-traumatic stress, the Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory, a measure of post-traumatic growth, the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 30-item core Quality of Life Questionnaire. We examined the associations between these outcome variables, and quality of life scores were compared to normative values for the general and gynecologic cancer populations.
Results: Thirty percent of women reported clinically significant post-traumatic stress symptoms and 71% endorsed clinically significant depressive symptoms. More post-traumatic stress was associated with less post-traumatic growth, more depressive symptoms, and worse quality of life. In general, women's quality of life was worse than the general population but comparable to women with stage III-IV ovarian cancer and women with cervical cancer. Social functioning was markedly lower in our sample and women reported more pain, diarrhea, and financial difficulties post-PE compared to published norms for the general population and women with ovarian or cervical cancer. There were no differences in quality of life based on age, type of PE, type of urinary diversion, or cancer type.
Conclusions: Findings support long-term continued symptom management and the ongoing rehabilitation of patients to optimize physical, psychological, and social well-being in PE survivorship.
目的:我们研究了接受盆腔外扩张术(PE)的复发性妇科癌症妇女的创伤后反应和生活质量:21名至少在6个月前接受过PE手术的女性完成了创伤后应激测量 "事件影响量表-修订版"、创伤后成长测量 "创伤后成长量表"、流行病学研究中心抑郁量表和欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织30项核心生活质量问卷。我们研究了这些结果变量之间的关联,并将生活质量评分与普通人群和妇科癌症人群的标准值进行了比较:结果:30%的妇女报告有临床意义的创伤后应激症状,71%的妇女有临床意义的抑郁症状。创伤后应激反应越严重,创伤后成长越慢,抑郁症状越严重,生活质量越差。总体而言,妇女的生活质量比普通人群差,但与罹患 III-IV 期卵巢癌的妇女和罹患宫颈癌的妇女相当。与已公布的普通人群和卵巢癌或宫颈癌妇女的标准值相比,我们的样本中妇女的社会功能明显较低,并报告了更多的PE后疼痛、腹泻和经济困难。生活质量因年龄、PE类型、尿路改道类型或癌症类型而无差异:研究结果支持对患者进行长期持续的症状管理和康复治疗,以优化 PE 幸存者的生理、心理和社会福祉。
期刊介绍:
Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease.
Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.