The association of Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy for benign disease: Insurance status remains an important factor in access to high-volume centers.
Marin Kheng, Tomohiro Ko, Alexander Manzella, Joshua C Chao, Amanda M Laird, Toni Beninato
{"title":"The association of Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy for benign disease: Insurance status remains an important factor in access to high-volume centers.","authors":"Marin Kheng, Tomohiro Ko, Alexander Manzella, Joshua C Chao, Amanda M Laird, Toni Beninato","doi":"10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicaid expansion has been associated with improved access to surgical care at high-volume centers. Its impact on parathyroidectomy, however, is unclear. We evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy at high- and low-volume centers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Vizient Clinical Data Base was queried for parathyroidectomies. Patients were grouped by insurance status and pre- and post-Medicaid expansion periods. Hospitals were stratified into tertiles (T1-T3) by operative volume (T1 = highest-volume centers). Odds of parathyroidectomy and a difference-in-differences analysis were conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 31,983 patients were identified. Patients were predominantly privately insured (49.9%). Uninsured and Medicaid patients had increasing odds of operation at lower-tertile centers (odds ratio: T1 = ref; uninsured: T2 = 10.0, T3 = 15.8; Medicaid: T2 = 6.2, T3 = 13.5; P < .001). Medicare patients, however, were less likely to undergo operation at lower-volume centers (odds ratio: T2 = 0.89, P < .001; T3 = 0.92, P = .002). Privately insured patients were the least likely to receive care at low-volume centers (odds ratio: T3 = 0.7, P < .001). Medicaid patients in nonexpansion states had 12-16 times higher odds of parathyroidectomy at lower-volume hospitals than their counterparts in expansion states (expansion/nonexpansion states: pre-expansion T3 = 2.3/28.0; postexpansion T3 = 1.3/21.4). Expansion was associated with an increase in the proportion of parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients, with larger gains seen at higher-volume centers (T1 = 5.0%, P = .01; T2 = 3.1%, P = .001; T3 = 2.7%, P = .03). Expansion was not associated with changes in payor distribution for uninsured, Medicare, or privately insured patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients at high-volume centers. However, in nonexpansion states, access to surgical treatment at high-volume centers remains limited for uninsured and underinsured patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22152,"journal":{"name":"Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2024.07.072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Medicaid expansion has been associated with improved access to surgical care at high-volume centers. Its impact on parathyroidectomy, however, is unclear. We evaluated the association between Medicaid expansion and parathyroidectomy at high- and low-volume centers.
Methods: The Vizient Clinical Data Base was queried for parathyroidectomies. Patients were grouped by insurance status and pre- and post-Medicaid expansion periods. Hospitals were stratified into tertiles (T1-T3) by operative volume (T1 = highest-volume centers). Odds of parathyroidectomy and a difference-in-differences analysis were conducted.
Results: In total, 31,983 patients were identified. Patients were predominantly privately insured (49.9%). Uninsured and Medicaid patients had increasing odds of operation at lower-tertile centers (odds ratio: T1 = ref; uninsured: T2 = 10.0, T3 = 15.8; Medicaid: T2 = 6.2, T3 = 13.5; P < .001). Medicare patients, however, were less likely to undergo operation at lower-volume centers (odds ratio: T2 = 0.89, P < .001; T3 = 0.92, P = .002). Privately insured patients were the least likely to receive care at low-volume centers (odds ratio: T3 = 0.7, P < .001). Medicaid patients in nonexpansion states had 12-16 times higher odds of parathyroidectomy at lower-volume hospitals than their counterparts in expansion states (expansion/nonexpansion states: pre-expansion T3 = 2.3/28.0; postexpansion T3 = 1.3/21.4). Expansion was associated with an increase in the proportion of parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients, with larger gains seen at higher-volume centers (T1 = 5.0%, P = .01; T2 = 3.1%, P = .001; T3 = 2.7%, P = .03). Expansion was not associated with changes in payor distribution for uninsured, Medicare, or privately insured patients.
Conclusions: Medicaid expansion was associated with an increase in parathyroidectomy for Medicaid patients at high-volume centers. However, in nonexpansion states, access to surgical treatment at high-volume centers remains limited for uninsured and underinsured patients.
期刊介绍:
For 66 years, Surgery has published practical, authoritative information about procedures, clinical advances, and major trends shaping general surgery. Each issue features original scientific contributions and clinical reports. Peer-reviewed articles cover topics in oncology, trauma, gastrointestinal, vascular, and transplantation surgery. The journal also publishes papers from the meetings of its sponsoring societies, the Society of University Surgeons, the Central Surgical Association, and the American Association of Endocrine Surgeons.