Development and validation of a recurrence risk assessment model for high-grade bladder cancer based on TCGA and GEO.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2024-09-30 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.21037/tcr-24-256
Hongxin Wang, Yuping Zheng, Cheng Zhang, Mingshan Li
{"title":"Development and validation of a recurrence risk assessment model for high-grade bladder cancer based on TCGA and GEO.","authors":"Hongxin Wang, Yuping Zheng, Cheng Zhang, Mingshan Li","doi":"10.21037/tcr-24-256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bladder cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed urinary cancers worldwide. Although muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) accounts for only 25% of bladder cancer cases, it has a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis, especially among high-grade cases. Despite the existence of some molecular markers, there is a clear clinical need for a robust recurrence prediction model that can assist in patient management and therapeutic decision-making. Therefore, we aimed to use public databases to develop such an effective assessment model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed a recurrence risk assessment model for high-grade bladder cancer based on the clinical information of 217 cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and profiles of 87 samples from GSE31684 in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Edge R was used to analyze differences between RNAs of bladder cancer in the TCGA database, with thresholds of P<0.05 and |log<sub>2</sub>(fold change)| >1; least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression models were used to screen the RNAs significantly related to recurrence with minimum λ. Survival receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the predictive accuracy of the model in the training and validation sets of GSE31684.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 2,876 differential RNAs obtained from TCGA data. Among a total of 284 RNAs identified as significantly related to recurrence of bladder cancer, 49 were obtained by LASSO regression, and 30 were finally obtained by multifactor risk regression to construct a risk assessment model. The model was found to predict the prognosis of bladder cancer recurrence well, with an AUC of 0.911 in the TCGA training set and an adjusted AUC value of 0.839 in the GEO validation set.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recurrence assessment model is a relatively accurate recurrence prediction tool for high-grade bladder cancer and could provide a guidance for the treatment of bladder cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"13 9","pages":"4973-4984"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483452/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-24-256","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bladder cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed urinary cancers worldwide. Although muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) accounts for only 25% of bladder cancer cases, it has a high recurrence rate and poor prognosis, especially among high-grade cases. Despite the existence of some molecular markers, there is a clear clinical need for a robust recurrence prediction model that can assist in patient management and therapeutic decision-making. Therefore, we aimed to use public databases to develop such an effective assessment model.

Methods: We developed a recurrence risk assessment model for high-grade bladder cancer based on the clinical information of 217 cases from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and profiles of 87 samples from GSE31684 in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. Edge R was used to analyze differences between RNAs of bladder cancer in the TCGA database, with thresholds of P<0.05 and |log2(fold change)| >1; least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression models were used to screen the RNAs significantly related to recurrence with minimum λ. Survival receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess the predictive accuracy of the model in the training and validation sets of GSE31684.

Results: There were 2,876 differential RNAs obtained from TCGA data. Among a total of 284 RNAs identified as significantly related to recurrence of bladder cancer, 49 were obtained by LASSO regression, and 30 were finally obtained by multifactor risk regression to construct a risk assessment model. The model was found to predict the prognosis of bladder cancer recurrence well, with an AUC of 0.911 in the TCGA training set and an adjusted AUC value of 0.839 in the GEO validation set.

Conclusions: The recurrence assessment model is a relatively accurate recurrence prediction tool for high-grade bladder cancer and could provide a guidance for the treatment of bladder cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于 TCGA 和 GEO 的高级别膀胱癌复发风险评估模型的开发与验证。
背景:膀胱癌是全球最常见的泌尿系统癌症之一:膀胱癌是全球最常见的泌尿系统癌症之一。虽然肌层浸润性膀胱癌(MIBC)仅占膀胱癌病例的 25%,但其复发率高、预后差,尤其是在高级别病例中。尽管存在一些分子标记物,但临床上显然需要一个强大的复发预测模型来协助患者管理和治疗决策。因此,我们旨在利用公共数据库开发这样一个有效的评估模型:我们根据癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)中 217 个病例的临床信息和基因表达总库(GEO)数据库中 GSE31684 中 87 个样本的特征,开发了一个高级别膀胱癌复发风险评估模型。使用Edge R分析TCGA数据库中膀胱癌RNA之间的差异,阈值为P2(折叠变化)|>1;使用最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)Cox回归模型筛选与复发显著相关的RNA,λ最小;在GSE31684的训练集和验证集中,使用生存期接收者操作特征(ROC)和曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型的预测准确性:结果:从TCGA数据中获得了2876条差异RNA。在284个与膀胱癌复发显著相关的RNA中,49个是通过LASSO回归得到的,30个是通过多因素风险回归最终得到的,从而构建了一个风险评估模型。该模型能很好地预测膀胱癌复发的预后,在TCGA训练集中的AUC为0.911,在GEO验证集中的调整AUC值为0.839:结论:复发评估模型是一种相对准确的高级别膀胱癌复发预测工具,可为膀胱癌的治疗提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
期刊最新文献
Construction and validation of prognostic model for colorectal mucinous adenocarcinoma patients and identification of a new prognosis related gene FAM174B. Erratum: Identification of a ferroptosis-related gene signature for the prognosis of pediatric neuroblastoma. Establishment and validation of a prediction model for gastric cancer with perineural invasion based on preoperative inflammatory markers. Establishment and verification of a prognostic immune cell signature-based model for breast cancer overall survival. Exosomal AHSG in ovarian cancer ascites inhibits malignant progression of ovarian cancer by p53/FAK/Src signaling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1