Ainoa García-Fernández, Teresa Bobes-Bascarán, Clara Martínez-Cao, Leticia González-Blanco, Jennifer Fernández-Fernández, Paula Zurrón-Madera, Elisa Seijo Zazo, Luis Jiménez-Treviño, María Paz García-Portilla, Julio Bobes, Pilar A Sáiz
{"title":"Psychological interventions for suicidal behavior in adolescents: a comprehensive systematic review.","authors":"Ainoa García-Fernández, Teresa Bobes-Bascarán, Clara Martínez-Cao, Leticia González-Blanco, Jennifer Fernández-Fernández, Paula Zurrón-Madera, Elisa Seijo Zazo, Luis Jiménez-Treviño, María Paz García-Portilla, Julio Bobes, Pilar A Sáiz","doi":"10.1038/s41398-024-03132-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent evidence indicates that the risk of death by suicide in teenagers has increased significantly worldwide. Consequently, different therapeutic interventions have been proposed for suicidal behavior in this particular population. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to provide an updated review of the existing psychological interventions for the treatment of suicide attempts (SA) in adolescents and to analyze the efficacy of such interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The studies were identified by searching PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from 2016 to 2022. According to the inclusion criteria, a total of 40 studies that tested the efficacy of different psychological interventions were selected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Various psychological interventions for adolescents with suicidal behaviors were identified. Most of those present promising results. However, to summarize results from recent years, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) was the most common and the only treatment shown to be effective for adolescents at high risk of suicide and SA. In contrast, empirical evidence for other psychological interventions focusing on deliberate self-harm (SH) is inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Interventions specifically designed to reduce suicidal risk in adolescents have multiplied significantly in recent years. There are a few promising interventions for reducing suicidal behaviors in adolescents evaluated by independent research groups. However, replication and dismantling studies are needed to identify the effects of these interventions and their specific components. An important future challenge is to develop brief and effective interventions to reduce the risk of death by suicide among the adolescent population.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-03132-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Recent evidence indicates that the risk of death by suicide in teenagers has increased significantly worldwide. Consequently, different therapeutic interventions have been proposed for suicidal behavior in this particular population. Therefore, the main objective of this study is to provide an updated review of the existing psychological interventions for the treatment of suicide attempts (SA) in adolescents and to analyze the efficacy of such interventions.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. The studies were identified by searching PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from 2016 to 2022. According to the inclusion criteria, a total of 40 studies that tested the efficacy of different psychological interventions were selected.
Results: Various psychological interventions for adolescents with suicidal behaviors were identified. Most of those present promising results. However, to summarize results from recent years, dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) was the most common and the only treatment shown to be effective for adolescents at high risk of suicide and SA. In contrast, empirical evidence for other psychological interventions focusing on deliberate self-harm (SH) is inconclusive.
Conclusions: Interventions specifically designed to reduce suicidal risk in adolescents have multiplied significantly in recent years. There are a few promising interventions for reducing suicidal behaviors in adolescents evaluated by independent research groups. However, replication and dismantling studies are needed to identify the effects of these interventions and their specific components. An important future challenge is to develop brief and effective interventions to reduce the risk of death by suicide among the adolescent population.
背景:最近的证据表明,全世界青少年自杀死亡的风险显著增加。因此,针对这一特殊人群的自杀行为,人们提出了不同的治疗干预措施。因此,本研究的主要目的是对治疗青少年自杀未遂(SA)的现有心理干预措施进行最新综述,并分析这些干预措施的疗效:方法:按照 PRISMA 指南进行了系统性回顾。方法:根据PRISMA指南开展了一项系统性综述,通过检索2016年至2022年的PubMed、PsychINFO、Web of Science和Scopus数据库确定了相关研究。根据纳入标准,共筛选出40项测试不同心理干预效果的研究:结果:研究发现了针对有自杀行为的青少年的各种心理干预措施。其中大多数都取得了可喜的成果。然而,总结近年来的研究结果,辩证行为疗法(DBT)是最常见的,也是唯一被证明对高自杀风险青少年和 SA 有效的治疗方法。相比之下,其他针对蓄意自残(SH)的心理干预的经验证据并不确定:近年来,专门用于降低青少年自杀风险的干预措施大幅增加。经独立研究小组评估,有几种减少青少年自杀行为的干预措施很有希望。然而,要确定这些干预措施及其具体组成部分的效果,还需要进行复制和拆解研究。未来的一项重要挑战是制定简短有效的干预措施,以降低青少年自杀死亡的风险。
期刊介绍:
Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.