Kana Suzuki, Asiko Ongaya, Gordon Okomo, Muuo Nzou, Evans Amukoye, Yasuhiko Kamiya
{"title":"Treatment-seeking behaviours of patients with tungiasis in endemic areas of Homa Bay County, Kenya: a mixed-methods study.","authors":"Kana Suzuki, Asiko Ongaya, Gordon Okomo, Muuo Nzou, Evans Amukoye, Yasuhiko Kamiya","doi":"10.1186/s41182-024-00639-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tungiasis, an ectoparasitic disease caused by sand fleas, causes suffering to millions of people in the tropics. Although the Kenyan National Policy Guidelines list tungiasis treatments as including disinfectants, flea repellents, and botanical oil, the insufficient knowledge and financial constraints of affected communities have led to neglect and inappropriate self-treatment. Current reports show insignificant progress on educational activities at the community level. Therefore, we investigated community residents' treatment-seeking behaviour concerning tungiasis, using an endemic area of Kenya as the research setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from the participants-410 adults who had experienced tungiasis-using a questionnaire, while qualitative data were collected from 20 older adults to 10 medical staffs using semi-structured individual interviews. The study was conducted in two sub-counties of Homa Bay County, Kenya.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Factors significantly correlated with using non-guideline-listed treatments for tungiasis were 'not knowing the causse of tungiasis', 'not seeking treatment from healthcare facilities and traditional healers', and 'wait and see to prevent infection in non-affected members'. The interviews with the older adults revealed 19 self-treatment options for tungiasis, and 40% of the participants opted for self-removal using sharp objects. Only two of these treatments were listed in the guidelines. The most frequently mentioned reason for using a self-treatment option was 'Someone else's idea'. The most frequently mentioned reason for choosing the best self-treatment option was 'Effectiveness'. Interviews with medical staff revealed 11 treatment options; only five of these treatments are listed in the guidelines. The most frequently mentioned reason for selecting/using the treatment was 'Supply situation'.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Residents' socioeconomic factors, cultural factors, and access to appropriate treatment, as well as knowledge of medical staff were significant factors that influenced the residents' tungiasis treatment-seeking behaviours. This study provides feasibility and baseline data to establish an effective, safe, and sustainable treatment for tungiasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23311,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Medicine and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11494815/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41182-024-00639-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TROPICAL MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Tungiasis, an ectoparasitic disease caused by sand fleas, causes suffering to millions of people in the tropics. Although the Kenyan National Policy Guidelines list tungiasis treatments as including disinfectants, flea repellents, and botanical oil, the insufficient knowledge and financial constraints of affected communities have led to neglect and inappropriate self-treatment. Current reports show insignificant progress on educational activities at the community level. Therefore, we investigated community residents' treatment-seeking behaviour concerning tungiasis, using an endemic area of Kenya as the research setting.
Methods: A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was employed. Quantitative data were collected from the participants-410 adults who had experienced tungiasis-using a questionnaire, while qualitative data were collected from 20 older adults to 10 medical staffs using semi-structured individual interviews. The study was conducted in two sub-counties of Homa Bay County, Kenya.
Results: Factors significantly correlated with using non-guideline-listed treatments for tungiasis were 'not knowing the causse of tungiasis', 'not seeking treatment from healthcare facilities and traditional healers', and 'wait and see to prevent infection in non-affected members'. The interviews with the older adults revealed 19 self-treatment options for tungiasis, and 40% of the participants opted for self-removal using sharp objects. Only two of these treatments were listed in the guidelines. The most frequently mentioned reason for using a self-treatment option was 'Someone else's idea'. The most frequently mentioned reason for choosing the best self-treatment option was 'Effectiveness'. Interviews with medical staff revealed 11 treatment options; only five of these treatments are listed in the guidelines. The most frequently mentioned reason for selecting/using the treatment was 'Supply situation'.
Conclusions: Residents' socioeconomic factors, cultural factors, and access to appropriate treatment, as well as knowledge of medical staff were significant factors that influenced the residents' tungiasis treatment-seeking behaviours. This study provides feasibility and baseline data to establish an effective, safe, and sustainable treatment for tungiasis.