The greater tuberosity version angle: a novel method of acquiring humeral alignment during intramedullary nailing.

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Open Pub Date : 2024-10-22 DOI:10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0105
Jose M Gutierrez-Naranjo, Luis M Salazar, Vaibhav A Kanawade, Emam E Abdel Fatah, Mohamed Mahfouz, Nicholas W Brady, Anil K Dutta
{"title":"The greater tuberosity version angle: a novel method of acquiring humeral alignment during intramedullary nailing.","authors":"Jose M Gutierrez-Naranjo, Luis M Salazar, Vaibhav A Kanawade, Emam E Abdel Fatah, Mohamed Mahfouz, Nicholas W Brady, Anil K Dutta","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aims to describe a new method that may be used as a supplement to evaluate humeral rotational alignment during intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion using the profile of the perpendicular peak of the greater tuberosity and its relation to the transepicondylar axis. We called this angle the greater tuberosity version angle (GTVA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study analyzed 506 cadaveric humeri of adult patients. All humeri were CT scanned using 0.625 × 0.625 × 0.625 mm cubic voxels. The images acquired were used to generate 3D surface models of the humerus. Next, 3D landmarks were automatically calculated on each 3D bone using custom-written C++ software. The anatomical landmarks analyzed were the transepicondylar axis, the humerus anatomical axis, and the peak of the perpendicular axis of the greater tuberosity. Lastly, the angle between the transepicondylar axis and the greater tuberosity axis was calculated and defined as the GTVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The value of GTVA was 20.9° (SD 4.7°) (95% CI 20.47° to 21.3°). Results of analysis of variance revealed that females had a statistically significant larger angle of 21.95° (SD 4.49°) compared to males, which were found to be 20.49° (SD 4.8°) (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study identified a consistent relationship between palpable anatomical landmarks, enhancing IMN accuracy by utilizing 3D CT scans and replicating a 20.9° angle from the greater tuberosity to the transepicondylar axis. Using this angle as a secondary reference may help mitigate the complications associated with malrotation of the humerus following IMN. However, future trials are needed for clinical validation.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 10","pages":"929-936"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11493473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.510.BJO-2024-0105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: This study aims to describe a new method that may be used as a supplement to evaluate humeral rotational alignment during intramedullary nail (IMN) insertion using the profile of the perpendicular peak of the greater tuberosity and its relation to the transepicondylar axis. We called this angle the greater tuberosity version angle (GTVA).

Methods: This study analyzed 506 cadaveric humeri of adult patients. All humeri were CT scanned using 0.625 × 0.625 × 0.625 mm cubic voxels. The images acquired were used to generate 3D surface models of the humerus. Next, 3D landmarks were automatically calculated on each 3D bone using custom-written C++ software. The anatomical landmarks analyzed were the transepicondylar axis, the humerus anatomical axis, and the peak of the perpendicular axis of the greater tuberosity. Lastly, the angle between the transepicondylar axis and the greater tuberosity axis was calculated and defined as the GTVA.

Results: The value of GTVA was 20.9° (SD 4.7°) (95% CI 20.47° to 21.3°). Results of analysis of variance revealed that females had a statistically significant larger angle of 21.95° (SD 4.49°) compared to males, which were found to be 20.49° (SD 4.8°) (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: This study identified a consistent relationship between palpable anatomical landmarks, enhancing IMN accuracy by utilizing 3D CT scans and replicating a 20.9° angle from the greater tuberosity to the transepicondylar axis. Using this angle as a secondary reference may help mitigate the complications associated with malrotation of the humerus following IMN. However, future trials are needed for clinical validation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大结节版本角:一种在髓内钉钉入过程中获得肱骨对齐的新方法。
目的:本研究旨在描述一种新方法,该方法可在髓内钉(IMN)插入过程中,利用大结节垂直峰的轮廓及其与跨肱骨髁轴的关系,作为评估肱骨旋转对位的补充。我们将这一角度称为大结节角度(GTVA):本研究分析了 506 例成年患者的肱骨尸体。所有肱骨均使用 0.625 × 0.625 × 0.625 毫米立方体体素进行 CT 扫描。获得的图像用于生成肱骨的三维表面模型。然后,使用定制的 C++ 软件自动计算每块三维骨骼上的三维地标。分析的解剖地标包括横髁轴、肱骨解剖轴和大结节垂直轴的峰值。最后,计算横髁轴线与大结节轴线之间的夹角,并将其定义为 GTVA:GTVA值为20.9°(SD 4.7°)(95% CI 20.47°至21.3°)。方差分析结果显示,与男性的 20.49°(SD 4.8°)相比,女性的 21.95°(SD 4.49°)具有显著的统计学意义(P = 0.001):这项研究确定了可触摸的解剖地标之间的一致关系,通过利用三维 CT 扫描和复制从大结节到横髁轴的 20.9° 角度,提高了 IMN 的准确性。将这一角度作为辅助参考,可能有助于减轻 IMN 后与肱骨旋转不良相关的并发症。不过,还需要未来的试验进行临床验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arthroscopic Bankart repair versus arthroscopic Latarjet for anterior shoulder instability in adolescents. Revisiting the radiological signs for the first metatarsal pronation assessment. Clinical outcomes after extra-articular resection of hip joint tumour using a custom-made osteotomy guide and 3D-printed endoprosthesis with posterior column preserved. Uncompromised total knee arthroplasty function after distal femoral osteotomy. Outcomes of external versus internal fixation for traumatic lower limb fractures in low- and middle-income countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1