Monitored and Cared for at Home? Privacy Concerns When Using Smart Home Health Technologies to Care for Older Persons.

Q1 Arts and Humanities AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2024.2416121
Yi Jiao Angelina Tian, Vanessa Duong, Eike Buhr, Nadine Andrea Felber, Delphine Roulet Schwab, Tenzin Wangmo
{"title":"Monitored and Cared for at Home? Privacy Concerns When Using Smart Home Health Technologies to Care for Older Persons.","authors":"Yi Jiao Angelina Tian, Vanessa Duong, Eike Buhr, Nadine Andrea Felber, Delphine Roulet Schwab, Tenzin Wangmo","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2024.2416121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>States and families are facing growing challenges provide adequate care for older persons. Smart home health technologies (SHHTs) in the forms of sensor or robotic devices have been discussed as technical solutions for caregiving. Ethical and social concerns are raised with the use of such technologies for caregiving purposes, a particularly prominent one being privacy. This paper contributes to the literature by distinguishing privacy concerns into both the type of technologies and conceptual dimensions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data for this paper stem from sixty semi-structured interviews with older persons, informal, and formal caregivers living in the German-speaking regions of Switzerland. All information related to privacy, that were initially inductively coded, were thematically sorted into four dimensions of privacy (physical, psychological, social, and informational) and by the type of technologies studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants were especially concerned about privacy intrusions from smart wearables and ambient sensors than robotic technologies, which may be due to the relative lack of familiarity with the latter. Informational privacy was evident in the context of data collection capacities and potential for misuses of data. The installation and implementation of both visual and ambient sensors induced discomfort to their senses of physical space. Alerts of smart wearables and obtrusive sightings of SHHTs garnered worries related to stigmatization and manipulation, indicating intrusions into end-users' psychological privacy. Little discussions of social dimensions of privacy were evident in the data, even toward robotic technologies for their functions to promote social interactions for older persons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper is one of the first that use the stratification approach on empirical data to highlight the multi-faceted privacy concerns when technologies may be implemented in elder care. Our paper could thus supports potential end-users in deciding which technologies to use and how to balance different privacy concerns against other values that they may hold important.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2024.2416121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: States and families are facing growing challenges provide adequate care for older persons. Smart home health technologies (SHHTs) in the forms of sensor or robotic devices have been discussed as technical solutions for caregiving. Ethical and social concerns are raised with the use of such technologies for caregiving purposes, a particularly prominent one being privacy. This paper contributes to the literature by distinguishing privacy concerns into both the type of technologies and conceptual dimensions.

Methods: Data for this paper stem from sixty semi-structured interviews with older persons, informal, and formal caregivers living in the German-speaking regions of Switzerland. All information related to privacy, that were initially inductively coded, were thematically sorted into four dimensions of privacy (physical, psychological, social, and informational) and by the type of technologies studied.

Results: Participants were especially concerned about privacy intrusions from smart wearables and ambient sensors than robotic technologies, which may be due to the relative lack of familiarity with the latter. Informational privacy was evident in the context of data collection capacities and potential for misuses of data. The installation and implementation of both visual and ambient sensors induced discomfort to their senses of physical space. Alerts of smart wearables and obtrusive sightings of SHHTs garnered worries related to stigmatization and manipulation, indicating intrusions into end-users' psychological privacy. Little discussions of social dimensions of privacy were evident in the data, even toward robotic technologies for their functions to promote social interactions for older persons.

Conclusions: This paper is one of the first that use the stratification approach on empirical data to highlight the multi-faceted privacy concerns when technologies may be implemented in elder care. Our paper could thus supports potential end-users in deciding which technologies to use and how to balance different privacy concerns against other values that they may hold important.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在家接受监控和护理?使用智能家庭保健技术护理老年人时的隐私问题。
背景:国家和家庭在为老年人提供适当护理方面面临着日益严峻的挑战。以传感器或机器人设备为形式的智能家庭保健技术(SHTs)已被作为护理的技术解决方案加以讨论。将此类技术用于护理目的引发了伦理和社会问题,其中尤为突出的是隐私问题。本文从技术类型和概念两个维度对隐私问题进行了区分,为相关文献做出了贡献:本文的数据来源于对生活在瑞士德语区的老年人、非正式和正式护理人员进行的 60 次半结构式访谈。所有与隐私有关的信息都进行了初步归纳编码,并按隐私的四个维度(生理、心理、社会和信息)和所研究的技术类型进行了主题分类:结果:与机器人技术相比,参与者尤其担心智能可穿戴设备和环境传感器对隐私的侵犯,这可能是由于对后者相对缺乏了解。在数据收集能力和滥用数据的可能性方面,信息隐私是显而易见的。视觉传感器和环境传感器的安装和使用给他们的物理空间感带来了不适。智能可穿戴设备的警报和对骚扰性的人脸识别技术的观察引起了与污名化和操纵有关的担忧,这表明终端用户的心理隐私受到了侵犯。数据中几乎没有关于隐私的社会维度的讨论,甚至对机器人技术促进老年人社会交往的功能也是如此:本文是首篇使用分层方法对实证数据进行分析的论文之一,它强调了在老年人护理中应用技术时的多方面隐私问题。因此,我们的论文可以帮助潜在的最终用户决定使用哪种技术,以及如何在不同的隐私问题与他们可能认为重要的其他价值观之间取得平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Animals is "Still Genetics": Perspectives of Genome Scientists and Policymakers on Animal and Human Enhancement. Associations Between the Legalization and Implementation of Medical Aid in Dying and Suicide Rates in the United States. Ethics Consultation in U.S. Pediatric Hospitals: Adherence to National Practice Standards. Monitored and Cared for at Home? Privacy Concerns When Using Smart Home Health Technologies to Care for Older Persons. Advance Medical Decision-Making Differs Across First- and Third-Person Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1