Formulating tobacco control policies: How can local governments contribute?

IF 1.9 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Tobacco Prevention & Cessation Pub Date : 2024-10-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18332/tpc/191844
Sophie J A Jooren, Jeroen Bommelé, Eefje Willemse, Maria W J Jansen, Marc C Willemsen
{"title":"Formulating tobacco control policies: How can local governments contribute?","authors":"Sophie J A Jooren, Jeroen Bommelé, Eefje Willemse, Maria W J Jansen, Marc C Willemsen","doi":"10.18332/tpc/191844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Due to a continuing international trend of decentralization of public health policies, local governments are given an increasingly important role in tobacco control. The process of developing local-level tobacco control policies is an underexplored topic. This study uses grant applications as a data source to gain insight into the planning, development and proposed implementation of local tobacco control policies by regional public health departments in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Grant applications of 24 regional public health departments were analyzed using the second stage of the rational policy cycle, a four-stages policy model about the decisions made by local policy makers during the policy process. We coded the applications with open and axial coding.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Public health departments formulated four main goals for tobacco control: adding tobacco control policies to existing local policy documents, creating smoke-free (child) environments, developing and improving access to smoking cessation care, and participating in media campaigns. Public health departments often specify tobacco control aims and involve partners in reaching these aims. However, the grant applications lacked information about implementing these tobacco control policies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The information on implementation strategies and process evaluation, as well as the (evidence-based) legitimation for the policy choices, needs improvement. Under the current conditions, which include the brief explanation the departments received, an unclear mandate, insufficient funding, and local restricting factors such as time and knowledge, significant contributions to tobacco control policy cannot be expected from local governments.</p>","PeriodicalId":44546,"journal":{"name":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","volume":"10 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11484495/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tobacco Prevention & Cessation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/191844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Due to a continuing international trend of decentralization of public health policies, local governments are given an increasingly important role in tobacco control. The process of developing local-level tobacco control policies is an underexplored topic. This study uses grant applications as a data source to gain insight into the planning, development and proposed implementation of local tobacco control policies by regional public health departments in the Netherlands.

Methods: Grant applications of 24 regional public health departments were analyzed using the second stage of the rational policy cycle, a four-stages policy model about the decisions made by local policy makers during the policy process. We coded the applications with open and axial coding.

Results: Public health departments formulated four main goals for tobacco control: adding tobacco control policies to existing local policy documents, creating smoke-free (child) environments, developing and improving access to smoking cessation care, and participating in media campaigns. Public health departments often specify tobacco control aims and involve partners in reaching these aims. However, the grant applications lacked information about implementing these tobacco control policies.

Conclusions: The information on implementation strategies and process evaluation, as well as the (evidence-based) legitimation for the policy choices, needs improvement. Under the current conditions, which include the brief explanation the departments received, an unclear mandate, insufficient funding, and local restricting factors such as time and knowledge, significant contributions to tobacco control policy cannot be expected from local governments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定烟草控制政策:地方政府如何做出贡献?
导言:由于公共卫生政策权力下放这一持续的国际趋势,地方政府在烟草控制中扮演着越来越重要的角色。地方一级烟草控制政策的制定过程是一个未被充分探索的课题。本研究以拨款申请为数据来源,深入了解荷兰地区公共卫生部门规划、制定和拟议实施地方烟草控制政策的情况:方法:我们采用理性政策周期的第二阶段对 24 个地区公共卫生部门的拨款申请进行了分析,这是一个关于地方决策者在政策制定过程中所做决策的四阶段政策模型。我们采用开放式编码和轴向编码对申请进行了编码:公共卫生部门制定了四项主要的控烟目标:在现有的地方政策文件中增加控烟政策、创建无烟(儿童)环境、发展和改善戒烟治疗、参与媒体宣传。公共卫生部门通常会明确控烟目标,并让合作伙伴参与实现这些目标。然而,拨款申请中缺乏有关实施这些烟草控制政策的信息:结论:有关实施策略和过程评估的信息以及政策选择的(循证)合法性需要改进。在目前的条件下,包括各部门收到的简短解释、任务不明确、资金不足以及时间和知识等地方限制因素,不能期望地方政府对控烟政策做出重大贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
155
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation in populations with psychiatric and/or substance use problems: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Investigating an e-cigarette brand's use of music festivals for social media campaigns and experiential marketing. Targeted distribution of nicotine patches by mail to rural regions of Canada: Predictors of patch use. The trade of illicit cigarettes in Ghana: Insights from a policy synthesis and qualitative study. Tobacco control in Türkiye: A brief review of achievements, challenges, and prospects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1