Impact of Family Structure on Adolescent Depression Outcomes in a Collaborative Care Program.

IF 2.5 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of Primary Care and Community Health Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/21501319241291790
Brian A Lynch, Charles P Lewis, Jennifer L Vande Voort, Aiswarya L Nandakumar, RoxAnne M Brennan, Kristin C Cole, Sandra J Rackley, Chung-Ii Wi, Paul E Croarkin, Magdalena Romanowicz
{"title":"Impact of Family Structure on Adolescent Depression Outcomes in a Collaborative Care Program.","authors":"Brian A Lynch, Charles P Lewis, Jennifer L Vande Voort, Aiswarya L Nandakumar, RoxAnne M Brennan, Kristin C Cole, Sandra J Rackley, Chung-Ii Wi, Paul E Croarkin, Magdalena Romanowicz","doi":"10.1177/21501319241291790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>We aimed to investigate the effect of family structure on depression program outcomes for adolescents enrolled in a depression-focused, primary care-based collaborative care program.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study of primary care patients ages 12 to 18 years seen at a Midwestern academic center with data obtained by medical record review. We used logistic regression models to assess the effect of family structure on program graduation and achievement of a single Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Modified for Adolescents (PHQ-9M) score <5 at any time while enrolled.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adolescents were divided into 2 groups, Both Parents in Household (n = 179) and Parents Not Together (n = 161). The Both Parents in Household group had higher rates of graduation (38.0% vs 23.6%, <i>P</i> = .005) and achieving single PHQ-9M scores <5 (64.1% vs 46.2%, <i>P</i> = .002) than the Parents Not Together group.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Youth residing with both parents had higher rates of successful outcomes in a depression-focused collaborative care program.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"21501319241291790"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528800/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241291790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objectives: We aimed to investigate the effect of family structure on depression program outcomes for adolescents enrolled in a depression-focused, primary care-based collaborative care program.

Methods: This was a retrospective study of primary care patients ages 12 to 18 years seen at a Midwestern academic center with data obtained by medical record review. We used logistic regression models to assess the effect of family structure on program graduation and achievement of a single Patient Health Questionnaire 9-Modified for Adolescents (PHQ-9M) score <5 at any time while enrolled.

Results: Adolescents were divided into 2 groups, Both Parents in Household (n = 179) and Parents Not Together (n = 161). The Both Parents in Household group had higher rates of graduation (38.0% vs 23.6%, P = .005) and achieving single PHQ-9M scores <5 (64.1% vs 46.2%, P = .002) than the Parents Not Together group.

Discussion: Youth residing with both parents had higher rates of successful outcomes in a depression-focused collaborative care program.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家庭结构对合作护理计划中青少年抑郁症结果的影响。
引言/目的:我们旨在研究家庭结构对参加以抑郁症为重点、以初级保健为基础的合作保健项目的青少年抑郁症治疗效果的影响:这是一项回顾性研究,研究对象是在美国中西部一家学术中心就诊的 12 至 18 岁初级保健患者,研究数据通过病历审查获得。我们使用逻辑回归模型来评估家庭结构对项目毕业和青少年患者健康问卷 9-修订版(PHQ-9M)单项得分的影响:青少年被分为两组:父母均在家中组(n = 179)和父母不在家中组(n = 161)。双亲同住组的毕业率(38.0% vs 23.6%,P = .005)和 PHQ-9M 单项得分率(P = .002)均高于双亲不在一起组:讨论:与双亲同住的青少年在以抑郁症为重点的合作护理项目中取得成功的比例更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Merging Law and Medicine: Patient Attitudes About and Experiences with Social Needs Screening and Medical-Legal Partnerships in Primary Care. Understanding Experiences of First Contact Physiotherapy in General Practice: A Realist Qualitative Study. The Effects of a Health Literacy Promotion Program on Health Behaviors and Blood Pressure Levels Among Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Dynamics of Lifestyle Counseling for Chronic Diseases Within and Between General Practices and Social Work Services Causal Loop Diagram and Points for Improvement. "The resources are there, it's just not sufficient:" Primary Care Team Members and Their Experiences with Connecting Patients to Needed Resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1