Awareness and preparedness of healthcare workers for the initial wave of COVID-19 in Aotearoa New Zealand.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.26635/6965.6550
Thomas Pirker, Ibrahim S Al-Busaidi
{"title":"Awareness and preparedness of healthcare workers for the initial wave of COVID-19 in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Thomas Pirker, Ibrahim S Al-Busaidi","doi":"10.26635/6965.6550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The TMGH-Global COVID-19 Collaborative was a multinational, multicentre, cross-sectional survey assessing the awareness and preparedness of healthcare workers (HCWs) during the first wave of the pandemic across 57 countries. Here, we report the results from Aotearoa New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional survey was conducted at Christchurch Hospital between February and May 2020. Data were collected from a convenience sample of HCWs and analysed using descriptive and multivariate regression to determine awareness (out of 40) and preparedness (out of 15) scores and influencing factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 158 participants (response rate 20.8%), most were women (73%) and doctors (58%) with a median age of 38 years (interquartile range [IQR] 29-49). The median awareness and preparedness scores were 33.6 (IQR 31.1-35.1) and 8 (IQR 6-8), respectively. Mainstream media was the primary source of information on COVID-19 among HCWs. The awareness score was significantly affected by gender and profession, whereas the preparedness score was influenced by age, profession, clinical experience duration and COVID-19 training.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although frontline HCWs had high awareness levels, preparedness was low. Variables influenced awareness and preparedness differently. These findings identified gaps in pandemic readiness and factors that can be leveraged to enhance future pandemic preparedness and response in New Zealand.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"137 1604","pages":"42-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The TMGH-Global COVID-19 Collaborative was a multinational, multicentre, cross-sectional survey assessing the awareness and preparedness of healthcare workers (HCWs) during the first wave of the pandemic across 57 countries. Here, we report the results from Aotearoa New Zealand.

Methods: This cross-sectional survey was conducted at Christchurch Hospital between February and May 2020. Data were collected from a convenience sample of HCWs and analysed using descriptive and multivariate regression to determine awareness (out of 40) and preparedness (out of 15) scores and influencing factors.

Results: Of the 158 participants (response rate 20.8%), most were women (73%) and doctors (58%) with a median age of 38 years (interquartile range [IQR] 29-49). The median awareness and preparedness scores were 33.6 (IQR 31.1-35.1) and 8 (IQR 6-8), respectively. Mainstream media was the primary source of information on COVID-19 among HCWs. The awareness score was significantly affected by gender and profession, whereas the preparedness score was influenced by age, profession, clinical experience duration and COVID-19 training.

Conclusions: Although frontline HCWs had high awareness levels, preparedness was low. Variables influenced awareness and preparedness differently. These findings identified gaps in pandemic readiness and factors that can be leveraged to enhance future pandemic preparedness and response in New Zealand.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新西兰奥特亚罗瓦医护人员对 COVID-19 初潮的认识和准备情况。
目的:TMGH-全球 COVID-19 合作项目是一项多国、多中心、横断面调查,旨在评估 57 个国家的医护人员(HCWs)在第一波大流行期间的意识和准备情况。在此,我们报告新西兰奥特亚罗瓦的调查结果:这项横断面调查于 2020 年 2 月至 5 月期间在基督城医院进行。我们从方便的医护人员样本中收集了数据,并使用描述性和多元回归方法对数据进行了分析,以确定认知度(满分 40 分)和准备度(满分 15 分)得分及影响因素:在 158 名参与者(回复率为 20.8%)中,大多数为女性(73%)和医生(58%),年龄中位数为 38 岁(四分位数间距 [IQR] 29-49)。认知度和准备度的中位数分别为 33.6 分(IQR 31.1-35.1 分)和 8 分(IQR 6-8 分)。主流媒体是医护人员了解 COVID-19 的主要信息来源。认知度得分受性别和职业的影响较大,而准备度得分则受年龄、职业、临床经验时间和 COVID-19 培训的影响:结论:尽管一线医护人员的认知水平较高,但准备程度较低。影响意识和准备程度的变量各不相同。这些研究结果找出了新西兰在大流行病防备方面的差距,以及可用于加强未来大流行病防备和应对的因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
A laboratory-developed extraction free real-time PCR for Group A Streptococcus in throat swabs: greater detection and faster results. Assessing the impact of physical, mental and cognitive impairments on health-related quality of life in sepsis survivors following intensive care admission in New Zealand. Case study of a potential West Polynesian variant of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Cultural safety and the medical profession in Aotearoa New Zealand: a training framework and the pursuit of Māori health equity. Ethnic variations in traumatic injury hospitalisations in a health region of Aotearoa New Zealand-10-year review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1