Polokalama Fekumi ki he Kanisā 'o e Halanga-me'atokoní-Ko e vakai 'a e Tongá: Tongan New Zealanders' views on how to ensure the National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme works well for the Tongan community.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.26635/6965.6489
Viliami Puloka, Aivi Puloka, Michelle Lambert, Louise Signal
{"title":"Polokalama Fekumi ki he Kanisā 'o e Halanga-me'atokoní-Ko e vakai 'a e Tongá: Tongan New Zealanders' views on how to ensure the National Bowel Cancer Screening Programme works well for the Tongan community.","authors":"Viliami Puloka, Aivi Puloka, Michelle Lambert, Louise Signal","doi":"10.26635/6965.6489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The National Bowel Screening Programme (NBSP) fails to deliver screening equitably to Pacific New Zealanders. This research explored Tongan New Zealanders' experiences of participating in the NBSP and their views on ensuring the programme works well for the Tongan community.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In 2021, we conducted two talanoa focus groups with Tongan New Zealanders who had participated in the NBSP (n=26), recruited through a Pacific provider in Auckland. Participants were aged 60 or more and were Tongan born. Interviews with four Pacific experts working in the NBSP were also undertaken. Their views on the NBSP were explored and analysed using thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While the research participants valued the opportunity to participate in the NBSP, they had many valuable insights about strengthening it, as did the Pacific experts. Key was a by Tongan, for Tongan service run by Tongan providers, one based on Tongan models of health and health promotion, Tongan values and ways of working, and using the Tongan language, which empowers Tongans to take control of their health.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This research demonstrates critical elements of an effective, culturally appropriate and empowering NBSP for Tongans led by Tongan providers. If these findings are enacted, more effective delivery of bowel screening to Tongans will likely be enabled, reducing inequity in participation between Tongans and other New Zealanders. What is required is courage and political will to shift power and resources to ensure equitable outcomes in the NBSP, not only for Tongans but for all Pacific peoples.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"137 1604","pages":"53-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6489","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: The National Bowel Screening Programme (NBSP) fails to deliver screening equitably to Pacific New Zealanders. This research explored Tongan New Zealanders' experiences of participating in the NBSP and their views on ensuring the programme works well for the Tongan community.

Method: In 2021, we conducted two talanoa focus groups with Tongan New Zealanders who had participated in the NBSP (n=26), recruited through a Pacific provider in Auckland. Participants were aged 60 or more and were Tongan born. Interviews with four Pacific experts working in the NBSP were also undertaken. Their views on the NBSP were explored and analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: While the research participants valued the opportunity to participate in the NBSP, they had many valuable insights about strengthening it, as did the Pacific experts. Key was a by Tongan, for Tongan service run by Tongan providers, one based on Tongan models of health and health promotion, Tongan values and ways of working, and using the Tongan language, which empowers Tongans to take control of their health.

Conclusions: This research demonstrates critical elements of an effective, culturally appropriate and empowering NBSP for Tongans led by Tongan providers. If these findings are enacted, more effective delivery of bowel screening to Tongans will likely be enabled, reducing inequity in participation between Tongans and other New Zealanders. What is required is courage and political will to shift power and resources to ensure equitable outcomes in the NBSP, not only for Tongans but for all Pacific peoples.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Polokalama Fekumi ki he Kanisā 'o e Halanga-me'atokoní-Ko e vakai 'a e Tongá:汤加籍新西兰人对如何确保国家肠癌筛查计划在汤加社区良好运作的看法。
目的:国家肠道筛查计划(NBSP)未能公平地为太平洋裔新西兰人提供筛查。本研究探讨了汤加籍新西兰人参与国家肠道筛查计划的经历,以及他们对确保该计划在汤加社区良好运作的看法:2021 年,我们通过奥克兰的一家太平洋地区服务提供商,与参加过 "国家预算和服务计划 "的汤加籍新西兰人(人数为 26 人)开展了两次 talanoa 焦点小组讨论。参与者年龄在 60 岁或以上,在汤加出生。此外,还采访了四位在 NBSP 工作的太平洋地区专家。采用主题分析法探讨和分析了他们对 NBSP 的看法:与太平洋地区的专家一样,研究参与者非常珍惜参与国家基础科学计划的机会,并对加强该计划提出了许多有价值的见解。关键是由汤加人提供服务,由汤加服务提供者为汤加人提供服务,以汤加人的健康和健康促进模式、汤加人的价值观和工作方式为基础,使用汤加语言,使汤加人有能力掌控自己的健康:这项研究表明,在汤加医疗服务提供者的领导下,针对汤加人的有效、文化适宜和赋权的 NBSP 具有关键要素。如果这些研究成果得以实施,将有可能更有效地为汤加人提供肠道筛查,减少汤加人和其他新西兰人在参与筛查方面的不平等。现在需要的是勇气和政治意愿,以转移权力和资源,确保 NBSP 取得公平的成果,这不仅是为了汤加人,也是为了所有太平洋地区的人民。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
Projected increases in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2020-2044. Delayed presentation of severe cervical myelopathy two years post-motorcycle accident: a case report. Does suicide in New Zealand follow a semi-lunar rhythm? How is the specialist-primary palliative care model functioning for cancer patients in the current New Zealand health system? Predatory journals: what can we do to protect their prey?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1