Predictors of symptom recurrence and survival in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction treated with self-expanding metal stents.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL Pub Date : 2024-10-18 DOI:10.26635/6965.6601
Michael Chieng, Henry Wei, Sarah Haydon, Cameron Schauer
{"title":"Predictors of symptom recurrence and survival in patients with malignant gastric outlet obstruction treated with self-expanding metal stents.","authors":"Michael Chieng, Henry Wei, Sarah Haydon, Cameron Schauer","doi":"10.26635/6965.6601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) poses a substantial symptomatic burden. While various therapeutic options exist, self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are a common palliative choice for patients who are ineligible for surgery. We studied SEMS outcomes to identify factors influencing stent dysfunction and patient survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multi-centre, retrospective review of 190 patients with GOO undergoing SEMS at three tertiary hospitals was performed over 2016-2022. Technical success, clinical success and adverse outcomes were recorded. Predictors of stent dysfunction and survival were evaluated using multivariate regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Technical success was achieved in 186/190 (97.9%) and clinical success in 156/186 (83.9%), defined as post-procedural gastric outlet obstruction symptom score (GOOSS) ≥2. Eighty-two (44.1%) patients experienced an adverse event with stent occlusion the most common (23.1%). Approximately one-third (32.3%) underwent a repeat intervention. Mean stent patency time was 67 days (standard deviation=76), and median post-stent survival was 95 days (37-197). Covered and partially covered SEMS carried three times the risk of stent dysfunction compared to uncovered SEMS (odds ratio 3.06, p=0.008). Mortality predictors were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥2 (p=0.03), extrinsic outlet obstruction (p=0.05) and presence of ascites (p=<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SEMS demonstrated technical and clinical success but posed a high risk of recurrence, with stent patency time falling short of survival in our cohort. With an evolving landscape of therapeutics for GOO, appropriate patient selection is paramount. Individuals with reduced performance status, extrinsic obstruction and/or ascites may be better candidates for SEMS due to more limited life expectancy. In this setting, uncovered SEMS carry the lowest risk of reintervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":48086,"journal":{"name":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","volume":"137 1604","pages":"22-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26635/6965.6601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) poses a substantial symptomatic burden. While various therapeutic options exist, self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) are a common palliative choice for patients who are ineligible for surgery. We studied SEMS outcomes to identify factors influencing stent dysfunction and patient survival.

Methods: A multi-centre, retrospective review of 190 patients with GOO undergoing SEMS at three tertiary hospitals was performed over 2016-2022. Technical success, clinical success and adverse outcomes were recorded. Predictors of stent dysfunction and survival were evaluated using multivariate regression.

Results: Technical success was achieved in 186/190 (97.9%) and clinical success in 156/186 (83.9%), defined as post-procedural gastric outlet obstruction symptom score (GOOSS) ≥2. Eighty-two (44.1%) patients experienced an adverse event with stent occlusion the most common (23.1%). Approximately one-third (32.3%) underwent a repeat intervention. Mean stent patency time was 67 days (standard deviation=76), and median post-stent survival was 95 days (37-197). Covered and partially covered SEMS carried three times the risk of stent dysfunction compared to uncovered SEMS (odds ratio 3.06, p=0.008). Mortality predictors were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≥2 (p=0.03), extrinsic outlet obstruction (p=0.05) and presence of ascites (p=<0.001).

Conclusion: SEMS demonstrated technical and clinical success but posed a high risk of recurrence, with stent patency time falling short of survival in our cohort. With an evolving landscape of therapeutics for GOO, appropriate patient selection is paramount. Individuals with reduced performance status, extrinsic obstruction and/or ascites may be better candidates for SEMS due to more limited life expectancy. In this setting, uncovered SEMS carry the lowest risk of reintervention.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用自膨胀金属支架治疗恶性胃出口梗阻患者症状复发和存活率的预测因素。
背景:恶性胃出口梗阻(GOO)是一种严重的症状负担。虽然存在多种治疗方案,但对于不符合手术条件的患者来说,自膨胀金属支架(SEMS)是一种常见的缓解选择。我们对 SEMS 的疗效进行了研究,以确定影响支架功能障碍和患者生存的因素:我们对三家三级医院在2016-2022年间接受SEMS治疗的190名GOO患者进行了多中心回顾性研究。记录了技术成功率、临床成功率和不良后果。使用多变量回归评估了支架功能障碍和存活率的预测因素:186/190(97.9%)例获得技术成功,156/186(83.9%)例获得临床成功,定义为术后胃出口梗阻症状评分(GOOSS)≥2。82名患者(44.1%)发生了不良事件,其中支架闭塞最为常见(23.1%)。约三分之一(32.3%)的患者接受了重复介入治疗。支架通畅时间平均为 67 天(标准差=76),支架后存活时间中位数为 95 天(37-197)。与未覆盖的SEMS相比,覆盖和部分覆盖的SEMS发生支架功能障碍的风险是未覆盖的SEMS的三倍(几率比3.06,P=0.008)。预测死亡率的因素包括东部合作肿瘤学组评分≥2(p=0.03)、出口外梗阻(p=0.05)和腹水(p=结论:SEMS 在技术和临床上都取得了成功,但复发风险很高,在我们的队列中,支架通畅时间与存活时间相差甚远。随着全球膀胱癌治疗方法的不断发展,选择合适的患者至关重要。由于预期寿命较短,表现状态较差、有外梗阻和/或腹水的患者可能更适合接受 SEMS 治疗。在这种情况下,未覆盖的 SEMS 再次介入的风险最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL
NEW ZEALAND MEDICAL JOURNAL MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
229
期刊最新文献
Projected increases in the prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Aotearoa New Zealand, 2020-2044. Delayed presentation of severe cervical myelopathy two years post-motorcycle accident: a case report. Does suicide in New Zealand follow a semi-lunar rhythm? How is the specialist-primary palliative care model functioning for cancer patients in the current New Zealand health system? Predatory journals: what can we do to protect their prey?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1