Brief online suicide risk assessment of adults does not affect state mood, even in the context of elevated suicidality self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2024-10-13 DOI:10.1002/ijop.13256
Ben C. Winestone, Glenn A. Melvin, Ruth Tatnell, David J. Hallford
{"title":"Brief online suicide risk assessment of adults does not affect state mood, even in the context of elevated suicidality self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress","authors":"Ben C. Winestone,&nbsp;Glenn A. Melvin,&nbsp;Ruth Tatnell,&nbsp;David J. Hallford","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The current study aimed to assess whether online suicide risk assessment affects state mood and is the first to examine if suicide-related self-stigma or coping related to suicidal ideation are predictors of mood change. The Australian participants (<i>N</i> = 661, <i>M</i><sub>age</sub> = 34.9, <i>SD</i> = 12.3, 57.1% female), recruited through a crowd-sourcing platform, completed a visual analogue mood measure before and after the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), an assessment tool. Followed by a modified version of the Internalised Stigma Scale, the Brief COPE and DASS-21. State mood did not change from pre- to post-suicide risk assessment in the overall sample, <i>t</i>(662) = −.16, <i>p</i> = .868, <i>d</i> = −.01. Contrary to hypotheses, neither self-stigma nor coping were related to mood change following exposure to the SIDAS. The multiple regression model was not significant, <i>F</i>(9,643) = 1.16, <i>p</i> = .31., nor was any single predictor including gender, current Suicide risk β = −.04, <i>t</i> = −.80 or psychological distress β = −.09, <i>t</i> = −1.76, <i>p</i> = .08. These findings suggest that online exposure to a suicide risk tool is unlikely to be iatrogenic in relation to state mood, even in the context of elevated self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"59 6","pages":"1347-1352"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ijop.13256","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.13256","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current study aimed to assess whether online suicide risk assessment affects state mood and is the first to examine if suicide-related self-stigma or coping related to suicidal ideation are predictors of mood change. The Australian participants (N = 661, Mage = 34.9, SD = 12.3, 57.1% female), recruited through a crowd-sourcing platform, completed a visual analogue mood measure before and after the Suicidal Ideation Attributes Scale (SIDAS), an assessment tool. Followed by a modified version of the Internalised Stigma Scale, the Brief COPE and DASS-21. State mood did not change from pre- to post-suicide risk assessment in the overall sample, t(662) = −.16, p = .868, d = −.01. Contrary to hypotheses, neither self-stigma nor coping were related to mood change following exposure to the SIDAS. The multiple regression model was not significant, F(9,643) = 1.16, p = .31., nor was any single predictor including gender, current Suicide risk β = −.04, t = −.80 or psychological distress β = −.09, t = −1.76, p = .08. These findings suggest that online exposure to a suicide risk tool is unlikely to be iatrogenic in relation to state mood, even in the context of elevated self-stigma, suicidal ideation and psychological distress.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对成年人进行简短的在线自杀风险评估,即使在自杀自我污名、自杀意念和心理困扰升高的情况下,也不会影响其状态情绪。
本研究旨在评估在线自杀风险评估是否会影响状态情绪,并首次研究与自杀相关的自我污名或与自杀意念相关的应对措施是否是情绪变化的预测因素。通过众包平台招募的澳大利亚参与者(N = 661,Mage = 34.9,SD = 12.3,57.1%为女性)在使用评估工具自杀意念属性量表(SIDAS)前后完成了视觉模拟情绪测量。之后还完成了修改版内化耻辱感量表、简短 COPE 和 DASS-21。在总体样本中,自杀风险评估前后的状态情绪没有变化,t(662)= -.16,p = .868,d = -.01。与假设相反,在接触 SIDAS 后,自我耻辱感和应对方式都与情绪变化无关。多元回归模型不显著(F(9,643) = 1.16, p = .31.),包括性别、当前自杀风险 β = -.04, t = -.80 或心理困扰 β = -.09, t = -1.76, p = .08在内的任何单一预测因子也不显著。这些研究结果表明,即使在自我污名、自杀意念和心理困扰升高的情况下,在线接触自杀风险工具也不太可能对状态情绪产生先天性影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychology
International Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.
期刊最新文献
Impact of French lockdowns on bereavement experiences: Insight from ALCESTE analysis revealing psychological resilience and distinct grief dynamics amidst COVID-19. Virtual motivational interviewing for physical activity among older adults: A non-randomised, mixed-methods feasibility study. Dimensionality in confirmatory factor analysis is not in the eye of the beholder: Ancillary bifactor statistical indices illuminate dimensionality and reliability. Getting started with the graded response model: An introduction and tutorial in R. Profiles of intergenerational and digital solidarity between middle-aged parents and young adult children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with parents' psychological well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1