Interconnected influence: Unraveling purdue pharmaceutical's role in the global response to the opioid crisis

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE International Journal of Drug Policy Pub Date : 2024-10-19 DOI:10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104604
Andrea Bowra , Amaya Perez-Brumer , Lisa Forman , Jillian Clare Kohler
{"title":"Interconnected influence: Unraveling purdue pharmaceutical's role in the global response to the opioid crisis","authors":"Andrea Bowra ,&nbsp;Amaya Perez-Brumer ,&nbsp;Lisa Forman ,&nbsp;Jillian Clare Kohler","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The global pharmaceutical industry has a long history of prioritizing profits over public health through widespread practices such as price gouging, deceptive marketing, and fraud. A prominent example of this issue is the mislabeling and mass-marketing of OxyContin by Purdue Pharmaceuticals (Purdue) that catalyzed the opioid crises in and beyond the United States.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Guided by Actor-Network Theory, this case study employs Visual Network Analysis to map the actors-networks involved in responding to the harms caused by Purdue. Data was generated from peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2007 and 2022 (<em>n</em> = 40) and imported into Gephi visualization software where centrality metrics were applied.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 39 actors and 99 relationships were visualized based on the relational thinking that actors who are heavily interconnected with others are rendered important. Centrality measures identified the socio-technical centrality of Purdue in influencing the response to the harms it caused. Purdue exerted influence through various avenues, most prominently through the creation and cooptation of pain advocacy groups, their close ties with United States elected officials, and through embedding pro-opioid messaging in international guidance documents. In doing so, Purdue was able to extend the reach and impact of their opioid promotion, while simultaneously limiting the capacity of regulatory bodies to pursue accountability and implement policies to mitigate opioid-related harms.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study advances understandings of the complex interplay between transnational pharmaceutical companies, global health systems, regulatory bodies, and public health. In doing so, we underscore the need for stronger regulation and increased transparency surrounding the interactions between pharma, patient groups, governments, and international organizations to better address and prevent future harms.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"133 ","pages":"Article 104604"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395924002883","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The global pharmaceutical industry has a long history of prioritizing profits over public health through widespread practices such as price gouging, deceptive marketing, and fraud. A prominent example of this issue is the mislabeling and mass-marketing of OxyContin by Purdue Pharmaceuticals (Purdue) that catalyzed the opioid crises in and beyond the United States.

Methods

Guided by Actor-Network Theory, this case study employs Visual Network Analysis to map the actors-networks involved in responding to the harms caused by Purdue. Data was generated from peer-reviewed and grey literature published between 2007 and 2022 (n = 40) and imported into Gephi visualization software where centrality metrics were applied.

Results

A total of 39 actors and 99 relationships were visualized based on the relational thinking that actors who are heavily interconnected with others are rendered important. Centrality measures identified the socio-technical centrality of Purdue in influencing the response to the harms it caused. Purdue exerted influence through various avenues, most prominently through the creation and cooptation of pain advocacy groups, their close ties with United States elected officials, and through embedding pro-opioid messaging in international guidance documents. In doing so, Purdue was able to extend the reach and impact of their opioid promotion, while simultaneously limiting the capacity of regulatory bodies to pursue accountability and implement policies to mitigate opioid-related harms.

Conclusion

This study advances understandings of the complex interplay between transnational pharmaceutical companies, global health systems, regulatory bodies, and public health. In doing so, we underscore the need for stronger regulation and increased transparency surrounding the interactions between pharma, patient groups, governments, and international organizations to better address and prevent future harms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相互关联的影响:解读普渡制药公司在全球应对阿片类药物危机中的作用。
背景:长期以来,全球制药业通过哄抬价格、欺骗性营销和欺诈等普遍做法,将利润置于公众健康之上。普渡制药公司(Purdue)对奥施康定(OxyContin)的错误标签和大规模营销就是这一问题的一个突出例子,它催化了美国国内外的阿片类药物危机:本案例研究以 "行为者网络理论 "为指导,采用视觉网络分析法绘制了参与应对普渡制药公司所造成危害的行为者网络图。数据来自 2007 年至 2022 年间发表的同行评审和灰色文献(n = 40),并导入 Gephi 可视化软件,应用中心度量:结果:根据 "相互联系紧密的行为者更重要 "的关系思维,共对 39 个行为者和 99 种关系进行了可视化。中心度量确定了普渡大学在影响对其造成的危害做出反应方面的社会技术中心度。普渡大学通过各种途径施加影响,其中最突出的是通过创建和收买疼痛倡导团体、与美国民选官员保持密切联系,以及在国际指导文件中嵌入支持阿片类药物的信息。通过这种方式,普渡大学得以扩大其阿片类药物宣传的范围和影响,同时限制了监管机构追究责任和实施政策以减轻阿片类药物相关危害的能力:本研究加深了人们对跨国制药公司、全球卫生系统、监管机构和公共卫生之间复杂相互作用的理解。因此,我们强调有必要加强监管,提高制药公司、患者团体、政府和国际组织之间互动的透明度,以更好地应对和预防未来的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
期刊最新文献
National impact of a constraining regulatory framework on pregabalin dispensations in France, 2020–2022 Suboptimal uptake and placement of a mandatory alcohol pregnancy warning label in Australia Increases in employment over six months following Khanya: A secondary analysis of a pilot randomized controlled trial of a peer-delivered behavioral intervention for substance use and HIV medication adherence in Cape Town, South Africa The criminal careers of Australian drug traffickers Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cannabis cultivation and use in 18 countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1